It was the Police Commissioner who asked for it to be closed. I don't think anyone has a choice; it was for the coroner to weigh the reasons for and against.Speddings lawyer was all for the open court , do they have a choice ?
It was the Police Commissioner who asked for it to be closed. I don't think anyone has a choice; it was for the coroner to weigh the reasons for and against.Speddings lawyer was all for the open court , do they have a choice ?
In a closed court situation would William's parents (foster and bio) at least be able to hear the testimony?
I've just had an awful thought. Five is the number of POIs at last count. Could all the questioning of POIs be in closed session?
Thanks SAI guess it depends on a decision about that from the coroner. I would imagine that the coroner can allow whoever she chooses into the courtroom.
But I would guess that the parents probably won't be allowed. They likely are not privy to everything that goes on with the investigation. imo
If the lawyers are present, at least the 'interested persons' will be advised what happened.I don't think so. An article that I read said that the 5 witnesses are also the people who have asked for pseudonyms.
A handful of the 54 people on a draft witnesses list have been assigned pseudonyms and granted permission to give evidence before just the coroner, lawyers and court staff.
Parts of the William Tyrrell inquest to be held behind closed doors
If the lawyers are present, at least the 'interested persons' will be advised what happened.
I think it's their job to inform their clients. But you are right; I was thinking that the exclusion Mr O'Brien was complaining about was discussion of reasons for the closed court, but there were witnesses examined in closed session on Monday. I would say the five or so are being taken one at a time, and some of the lawyers and the media are OK about secrecy for some of them but feel it's being taken too far.Due to yesterday when all the lawyers were not allowed in, I am wondering exactly whose lawyers will be allowed.
I don't think some witnesses lawyers can be trusted to not tell their clients what has happened, or work out different strategies for when their clients testify.
If some legal teams were excluded as reported, would they have received full brief's from the Court?
The coroner says that the closing of the court is in the 'interest of justice'.
Does that sound as if revealing this 'handful of witnesses' and their testimony has the potential to hinder the police investigation? Or perhaps it has the potential to make another witness claim self-incrimination and not testify?
Parts of the William Tyrrell inquest will be held in secret after a NSW coroner ruled it was in the interest of justice for some witnesses to give evidence behind closed doors.
Public scrutiny of the court and its processes was an important factor in delivering justice, the coroner said, but publication had the potential to frustrate its operation.
Parts of the William Tyrrell inquest to be held behind closed doors
Mine seems okdoes anyone elses websleuths page keep showing its loading, circle going around and around, so cant use refresh button?
does anyone elses websleuths page keep showing its loading, circle going around and around, so cant use refresh button?
I would definitely say new evidence can come up as witnesses are compelled to tell the truth or commit perjury.I was also wondering: can new evidence come to light in this instance or is the purpose of the inquest to go over/confirm their current evidence?
ok so not just me! also have to hit the like button several times, then when i come back later theyre all unliked! first world problems haha!I have to hit post reply up to 6 times sometimes as the circle goes round and round then nothing
I have to hit post reply up to 6 times sometimes as the circle goes round and round then nothing
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.