I am wondering what the link is in the first place to even have this fellow on the suspect list in the WT case. They searched his van, but I don't remember reading that they had found anything relative to the case? He was part of the search party, but that was after the disappearance took place. He had a white van, but it seems the focus has thus far been on these 3 vehicles seen by FFC, none of which is a white van. He has sex convictions, but not with minors, and nothing has been noted to say he has pedophilic tendencies. It seems a stretch to me if they have him under suspicion just because i)he's odd; ii)he's known to sleep in his van if working in the area; iii)he participated as an official searcher in the search; iv)he drove a white van (which as far as we've been told, a white van hasn't been suggested as a vehicle of interest(?); v)he has sex convictions of a homosexual nature with young adult developmentally-delayed victims. Did I miss something?
I suppose that since most of the week's testimony was under pub-ban, we may have missed most of this discussion?
right Kiwi
