Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #44

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #281
  • #282
Deleted.
 
Last edited:
  • #283
I wonder if during the closed questioning it was put to Savage that he was planning to drive to Casino. I thought he might have remembered when his lawyer brought up the deaths of his wife and of his brother.
 
  • #284
Interesting that that tweet has now been deleted. Wonder why? There's nothing in it that hasn't already been in msm many times.

Yes, please delete my reply from your post p&g. I am going to delete my post. It is obviously suppressed.
 
  • #285
  • #286
It's come back on!

Not seeing that at the moment. I will check for a little while before I delete my post content.

Have you refreshed your twitter feed? I keep refreshing mine.
 
  • #287
Yes, please delete my reply from your post p&g. I am going to delete my post. It is obviously suppressed.
Will do.

Edited to ad - have deleted the part that contained the name. The rest is still there in the earlier tweet.
 
  • #288
  • #289
I just refreshed and that tweet has not been retweeted!! It has named a specific person which is why I am thinking it isn't permitted.
 
  • #290
Ok deleted gone again..
 
  • #291
  • #292
  • #293
^^^ That tweet contains a name too...I wonder if Lia deletes it as well.

tenor.gif
 
  • #294
  • #295
I can't understand why the previous name would have been suppressed.

Likely because he is no longer a POI and has not been called to the inquest. imo

Nothing else happening at the moment. Maybe Lia is waiting longer before she tweets now.
 
  • #296
I can't understand why the previous name would have been suppressed.
Me neither! I mean, it's not like we don't know about him...it's been out there for some time!!
 
  • #297
Likely because he is no longer a POI and has not been called to the inquest. imo

Nothing else happening at the moment. Maybe Lia is waiting longer before she tweets now.
Why would they mention him then? Sorry to be dim, SA.
 
  • #298
Why would they mention him then? Sorry to be dim, SA.

You are not dim. Maybe because he is not a party to the proceedings? And will have no chance of rebuttal or explaining? Maybe because he will try to sue them? Who knows.

Still no more tweets. Maybe what's happening is under suppression.
 
  • #299
Why would they mention him then? Sorry to be dim, SA.
I think she was adding her own commentary perhaps in anticipation and after tweeting realized that wasn't appropriate. She needs to say what's happening at the inquest and not indulge in free association.
 
  • #300
Well, we know they must be speaking of Jones now. Did he answer Beverley Sharpe's phone call? Where was he? Did she hear anything in the background?

Phone pings may have shown a location.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
63
Guests online
2,115
Total visitors
2,178

Forum statistics

Threads
632,106
Messages
18,622,059
Members
243,021
Latest member
sennybops
Back
Top