Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - # 6

[Blessed]

That was a very short interview.

What did we miss?? I couldnt even find it.

 

[they'll get you]

A lot of people have confidence in LE. I wish I shared that confidence.

I've felt the same with some crimes thinking OMG where is the justice, this b**tard is going to walk!

Take heart fellow sleuther because every one of the murderers are behind bars as we speak.

Take some deep breaths, give them time.....our cops are tops.

Don't forget to breath.
:deepbreaths::deepbreaths:
:deepbreaths::deepbreaths:
:deepbreaths::deepbreaths:

 

[Nataliah]

Gary Jubelin just spoke to MSM at the link below. It was short and to the point. When he was asked about BS being a POI Gary said that he will not comment on any POI. He also said that depending on the terrain, the current search should be finished by tommorow afternoon. Gary also indicated that there will be further searches but would not say where and when.

http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...dding-as-search-for-william-tyrrell-continues

It must have been, not sure how I missed it.

 

[SamandJo]

That was my point SamandJo - I recall only bank statements being given, not actual receipts (although mentioned in MSM) which do NOT show a time stamp. Receipt and Bank statement are 2 completely different documents.

Ahh ok. Well yeah that's bizarre. Though hard to know because it's a really specific thing that a journalist could easily misinterpret what was said. Regardless of receipt/statement, just because he made a transaction doesn't mean that he was the one who made it

 

[katydid23]

I don't want to seem like I am defending BS because it seems that LE has some very strong indications that he is involved. They are jumping up and down and pointing at him.

But I just have these weird internal doubts/questions. he is an older guy. If he grabbed this innocent baby and disposed of him, it couldn't have been the first time he did such an evil deed. Could it? It is such a gruesome, drastic action.

And it still bothers me that there have been no other rumors/whispers about him being dodgy/sketchy with other kids. I think that CPS action was part of this one in connection with LE. If there were any accusations from the kids he would have been arrested already, imo.

I have to admit, I am still on the fence. :fence:

 

[fruity]

So that gave us absolutely nothing new. We already knew they expected the search to take 3 days and that there would be more searches afterwards. That information was given before the search started yesterday. How was that an 'update'?

 

[fruity]

I'm on the fence too, katydid. One moment I think it was him, the next I'm sure it was someone else.

 

[SamandJo]

It's probably reasonable to suggest he was somewhat involved. He may not have laid a finger on him but he could still be involved

 

[TootsieFootsie]

Twiddling my thumbs :waiting:

 

[Makara]

So that gave us absolutely nothing new. We already knew they expected the search to take 3 days and that there would be more searches afterwards. That information was given before the search started yesterday. How was that an 'update'?

Because you're getting it from the 'horses mouth' so to speak and not MSM.

 

[fruity]

One thing is for sure - Morgan Huxley was dead when the media trashed his reputation and insinuated that if you're sleeping with 14 women you deserve to be killed the way he was, with his pants around his ankles. Turns out that Morgan was the victim of a sexual predator.

If BS is innocent the media will have a LOT to answer for.

 

[Angeline]

"William Tyrell: Residents 'dread' what police may find in bushland search for missing boy"


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-...day-of-bush-search-for-william-tyrell/6275858

That article says they are going to search the area tomorrow (Wednesday) as well. Yesterday they said the search would be for 2 days. I wonder if they have found items of interest to keep them going.

Ugh, that road is sooooo eerie. It's long and dark with huge tall trees. The place they searched for Daniel Morcombe was so eerie as well

 

[Nataliah]

I don't want to seem like I am defending BS because it seems that LE has some very strong indications that he is involved. They are jumping up and down and pointing at him.

But I just have these weird internal doubts/questions. he is an older guy. If he grabbed this innocent baby and disposed of him, it couldn't have been the first time he did such an evil deed. Could it? It is such a gruesome, drastic action.

And it still bothers me that there have been no other rumors/whispers about him being dodgy/sketchy with other kids. I think that CPS action was part of this one in connection with LE. If there were any accusations from the kids he would have been arrested already, imo.

I have to admit, I am still on the fence. :fence:

I feel the same way. It's all well and good to ponder the logistics of if/how he could have pulled it off, but the 'why' is just as important. Either it was an accident OR he has managed to hide his deviance despite living in two small towns. I grew up in a small down, everyone knew who the dodgy men were (even if nothing was ever done about them). I don't know what to think, but I want it to be over!

 

[sosocurious]

WS was interviewed soon after William disappeared, more than once.
Presumably he gave his whereabouts (alibi)

The CCTV at the camera tennis club - I think it was said it turned up nothing. But maybe it did ??

The photos were not of number plates they were side on views - well some side on views would be unmistakable..

It just seems to me that if WS alibi for the day had checked out he would not be the (focus) POI.

 

[SouthAussie]

I feel the same way. It's all well and good to ponder the logistics of if/how he could have pulled it off, but the 'why' is just as important. Either it was an accident OR he has managed to hide his deviance despite living in two small towns. I grew up in a small down, everyone knew who the dodgy men were (even if nothing was ever done about them). I don't know what to think, but I want it to be over!

I'm not comfortable with the FACS interview/investigation in December - involving his treatment of children, and not to do with William's case.

Followed now by the missing S on his van, presumably done by someone in that 'supportive' area.

Could be nothing sinister ... could be something sinister.

 

[SamandJo]

Exactly. Police said there was a discrepancy in his story of where he was that morning, CCTV footage would give them the confidence in knowing there was a discrepancy

 

[fruity]

Because you're getting it from the 'horses mouth' so to speak and not MSM.

Detective Superintendent Michael Willing gave all of that information previously. It doesn't matter whether the head guy gives the information or if the information is given by someone under him at a press conference - Det Supt Willing wouldn't have given the information without the okay of Jubelin.

http://www.triplem.com.au/sydney/breaking-news/blog/2015/3/fresh-search-for-william-tyrell/

 

[Panda]

They do things weird here in the US sometimes. If they find evidence of blood or DNA in the trunk or whatever, they do NOT return the vehicle. It is impounded until the trial is over.

I think it's a little different if they have solid evidence which leads to the arrest of someone. As far as I'm aware, if they don't have sufficient evidence to lead to an arrest, they return the vehicle. Further along if they get more evidence, they can then tender any supplementary evidence found during the search, which may "bolster" their case.

 

[bearbear]

or someone else may have driven the van to fix the w/machine that day and taken william and bs helped dispose of evidence?
someone who may have offended before?

 

[katydid23]

I think it's a little different if they have solid evidence which leads to the arrest of someone. As far as I'm aware, if they don't have sufficient evidence to lead to an arrest, they return the vehicle. Further along if they get more evidence, they can then tender any supplementary evidence found during the search, which may "bolster" their case.

Right. So that means they did not find DNA from William or blood or fingerprint evidence in any of the vehicles. That does not mean he is innocent--just cautious and experienced perhaps.