If she's anything like my Gma..she'd have told him names, ages, star signs and whipped out a few photo's over coffee.
I think the children's foster situation might have meant she wouldn't.
If she's anything like my Gma..she'd have told him names, ages, star signs and whipped out a few photo's over coffee.
I think the children's foster situation might have meant she wouldn't.
ONLY days before William Tyrrell was abducted, his grandmother told repairman Bill Spedding she was expecting a stay-over visit from her family and could he fix her faulty washing machine.
That revelation calls into question toddler William’s trip to the mid north coast being a total “surprise” that nobody other than his parents could have known about.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...r-william-tyrell/story-fni0cx12-1227314208802
Do those laws really extend to not being able to talk about the kids at all? I thought the laws were just about not identifying them in the media (with "media" extending to school newsletters and websites etc)
They're not invisible. They still attend school, preschool, go out etc. You can't hide their existence!
This all comes back to one single news article that described the scene at the end of a days searching, that just happened to mention a van that could easily of been BS's.
Some people on the forum have decided it was definitively BS van.
Granted it was odd to have it mentioned specifically in the news article, well before BS was jumped on by the media at the displeasure of the police.
I just listened to the interview and she says they'd gone up to visit her mum's "a surprise visit" and they'd left early the night before "to surprise nanna".
That could be interpreted either way - a total surprise, or that going early was the surprise.
http://media.canberratimes.com.au/n...lliam-went-missing-parents-speak-6450695.html - it's at about the 2 minute mark
William 'Bill' Spedding's van was spotted at the scene of a massive hunt for toddler William Tyrell before his house was searched as part of a homicide investigation.
It is understood in the days after William disappeared, and as hundreds of volunteers searched for the toddler in surrounding bushland, Mr Spedding's work whitegoods van was spotted in the Kendall street outside William's grandmother's home.
It sat alone among police and emergency services cars.
- See more at: http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-...en-at-tyrell-search.html#sthash.aI0Ojp6G.dpuf
Im sure the police would have looked at media footage to see who/what was around during the search.
(From today http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...-william-tyrrell/story-fnii5s3x-1227314208802)
ONLY days before William Tyrrell was abducted, his grandmother told repairman Bill Spedding she was expecting a stay-over visit from her family and could he fix her faulty washing machine.
That revelation calls into question toddler William’s trip to the mid north coast being a total “surprise” that nobody other than his parents could have known about.
The surprise was that they were arriving early. Thursday instead of Friday.
If a plumber found a childs garment and reported it, then that is an entirely plausible trigger for the initial search of the house. Might not suit the demonising narrative from the media.
Incredibly obscure reporting. By definition it is not something only the parents knew about if in the same paragraph you said the grandmother also knew.
He went back the next week to fix the washing machine.
Actually, I didn't say it, MSM did.
I don't mean to be rude, but there is something very troll-like about some of the posts on this forum.
How many washing machine repair vans would there be in a small town like Kendall?
ETA a friendly heads up to posters that it is against WS TOS to post about private messaging. We don't want to get in trouble.![]()