Why even bother making up such a convoluted tale, when it would have been much easier to say she left in her car and was never seen again? Why dial the BF 32 times? None of that makes sense to me as a part of a set-up. It does make sense to me that Adrienne did that, as I think she was desperate and determined to reunite with him that night, wreck or no wreck. I do not believe such complicated lies would hold up for nearly two months now.
In the case of Lauren Spierer, the people she was with that night seem to have said she walked away on her own and they never saw her again and a few years later, are still sticking to this story, which can't be proved or disproved. They did not complicate the story with fake calls, etc. as far as we know.
I am not sure that anyone's story changed. Perhaps the police report will clear that up. Media reporting has been poor, as usual, so I seldom trust details from any source other than police.
ITA :seeya: and I haven't followed this case from the beginning, just maybe the last 2-3 weeks. It is very interesting that there is no clear POI at this point. I feel for these parents especially after their child went such through a devastating health issue to be face with this issue OMG!
Although, I have not personally followed a case where, they have cleared anyone before they knew
basically what happened to the victim, they have somewhat implied the BF & cab driver are somewhat cleared, so I take that very much into perspective.
I can identify with her thinking back to my young & stupid/insecure days. In going back & putting myself in her shoes that night, she was in a rage mode as the term not paying enough attention to me means he was paying too much attention to another girl. I am going to assume she had some alcohol or maybe/probably she was still on some kind of prescription medication, maybe a combination
but I am
not going to assume she was drunk/stoned, regardless we have documented calls that seemed to suggest she was in a rage.
In my mind, being in that situation (in a rage, push/pull tug about the BF) just having the accident, walking back to the apt., I would want to talk to my buddies about what happened about the accident, plus MY BF. Yeah, I get she may try to hide/change clothes not to get a DUI, but you would talk to your friends and at that age you assume anyone would cover, it wouldnt be a big secret IMO. This is the part that stuns me, that she would slip in/slip out
arrange to meet a cab elsewhere. This is what doesnt make sense to me, she wouldnt keep this a secret from her friends IMO, she would have talked to anyone after something that emotional
she would know whoever wont tattle on a DUI. BTW
the friends would have said, if you arent there
you dont get you to blow there is nothing that can be prove. Actually, I think she would seek her good friends for advice
not having it all figured out (upset & in the short distance after an accident) to do a stealth maneuver in sneaking in, changing clothes, leaving things, calling a cab. There has no reason presented that I know of that she wouldn't make her presence known.
I tend to believe it was a possibility someone was in the car with her. Who would that possibly be? Or, did she meet up with someone random by chance, outside of the apt. that she unloaded on
that then proceeded to take advantage of the situation & guide her not to be seen, walk to the cab, blah, blah. The whole point of a calling a cab is convenience & youre in a hurry to BE somewhere. A. was in a hurry, there was no reason for her to have to walked anywhere to catch a cab; it makes no sense to me.