panthera
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2006
- Messages
- 26,408
- Reaction score
- 91
Absoolutely agree. My belief is that window was staged to make it appear the perp had entered and/or exited through it. It would be quite difficult, IMO, to remove the screen from the outside without bending or damaging it, and much simpler to cut it for access. If the neighbors dogs barked at voices that morning wouldn't they also have sensed someone outside that night removing the screen and taking the child out of her room? It would also be difficult, IMO, to remove Isabel through the window unless there was a second person outside to hand her off to. And then how did they exit the yard? Was a gate open or unlocked? And again, no dogs alerted to any noise?It's the window...why would a would be abductor spend time taking the screen off when he could just have cut it ? I am wondering, if he opened the window to go in, wouldn't he have to leave it open,in case he needed to get out of the house in a hurry ? And,if he left it open,he took the huge risk of Isabel screaming and hollering.With the window open.In the dead of night ? Maybe she wouldn't scream.But maybe she would... MOO
And,if the neighbor woke up and heard men talking in low voices,and her dogs were going crazy at 6 :30 am, wouldn't the same thing have happened if an abductor had walked into the same breezeway area,and stood around taking the screen off etc. in the middle of the night ? MOO
To analyze it, that window was what first made me think that,as Fabiano Pacheco said "Things are not always what they seem to be " JMO
:waitasec:
MOO