AZ - Lori Vallow Daybell charged w/ conspiring to kill ex-husband Charles Vallow and another relative, Brandon Boudreaux, Chandler, Maricopa County #2

[Smelly Squirrel]

 

[Niner]

View attachment 576313View attachment 576314

And for us in Europe & beyond....

7pm UK Time
8pm Central European Time
9pm Eastern European Time
5am Australian Time

 

[Cindizzi]

Am I correct in thinking that Melanie Gibb is not on either side’s Witness list?
Has anyone seen a reason/explanation for that?

 

[Lorenathered]

I am curious about this also. If my memory is correct, MG had her hands all over this crime also. Wasn't she in at least one of the police interrogation videos helping Lori badmouth Charles to them?

 

[Cindizzi]

I am curious about this also. If my memory is correct, MG had her hands all over this crime also. Wasn't she in at least one of the police interrogation videos helping Lori badmouth Charles to them?

Yes she’s in a police interview video. MG was the star witness in the Idaho trial ( and her husband David IIRC ) and it all started in Arizona. So very curious to me JMO

 

[indicolite22]

I am curious about this also. If my memory is correct, MG had her hands all over this crime also. Wasn't she in at least one of the police interrogation videos helping Lori badmouth Charles to them?

The police video with her was from January 2019. At that time a group of women from the inner circle were made aware that Charles had been taken over by an evil spirit. ZP and MG were two of them, but they aren't testifying. Two other women from the circle (Christina and Sarena) are. There's no indication that MG was involved in Charles' death. ZP did perform some spiritual warfare beforehand, according to the texts revealed in the FOIA documents.

 

[Lorenathered]

I have to admit I am surprised that Lori didn't call her just so she could question her as payback. I also must confess that I am disappointed that I won't get to see that showdown. Maybe we would have gotten lucky and either of them could have screamed out incriminating evidence against each other. Wouldn't put it past either of them to get into a battle of who is more evil in court. JMO

 

[indicolite22]

I have to admit I am surprised that Lori didn't call her just so she could question her as payback. I also must confess that I am disappointed that I won't get to see that showdown. Maybe we would have gotten lucky and either of them could have screamed out incriminating evidence against each other. Wouldn't put it past either of them to get into a battle of who is more evil in court. JMO

The evil people here would be the murderers. We know who they are. There were others, who believed in the zombie nonsense but weren't instrumental in the murders nor did they profit from them. I wouldn't call them evil. Dumb, for sure. (IMO)

 

[Tricia]

Tom Evans is our guest tonight at 10:30 PM Eastern on Websleuths YouTube Live.
Tom was a juror in the first Lori Daybell trial and then wrote the book
Money, Power and Sex: The Lori Vallow-Daybell Trial by Juror Number 18.
Tom has a new book out Chad Daybell, The One Mighty and Strong: Religious Zealotry, Mormon Fundamentalism and Murder in Idaho.
Tom will be taking your questions tonight. Click on the video below and join us at 10:30 PM Eastern.

 

[Cindizzi]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1908212469937692762

 

[Cindizzi]

 

[Megnut]

"Why are you representing yourself?"

It took her a full two minutes of talking to NOT answer the question.

But then, cue the music to Rocky, she's fighting for all women (who languish in jail without speedy trials). She is uplifting and strengthening women every day. She says she's been wrongly convicted for "a family tragedy", not a crime.

She is the entire cast of her drama. Victim/heroine.

She's a peacemaker. People pleaser. Hard to stand up for herself, but she's doing it for the women.

How do they fit her big head in a jail cell?

JMO

 

[Megnut]

15 m mark

She's just finished saying how God put her in the trenches to uplift and strength the eight women in her segregation pod. God put her there? Pretty sure a judge and jury did...

She is asked if she loves her children. Watch her mouth say yes. Watch her head shake no.
JMO

 

[indicolite22]

Q & A with prosecutor Rachel Smith:

 

[Diddian]

Q & A with prosecutor Rachel Smith:

Yes, by all means, have Rachel Smith and Rob Wood do a Q & A of Nate Eaton (as RS suggests at end of this video)! (As long as they ask nothing and as long as Nate provides no responses that would grant LVD the right to subpoena Nate in her own defense.)

 

[Diddian]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1908212469937692762

View attachment 576498View attachment 576499View attachment 576498

Since they are perpetually connected by portal, I think it only right that Chad also wear a "RACC" belt at the same time so if LVD does anything to compel an officer to activate it, unindicted co-conspirator Chad too will feel the result.

(His should be mounted such that it impacts "the storm.")

 

[indicolite22]

Since they are perpetually connected by portal, I think it only right that Chad also wear a "RACC" belt at the same time so if LVD does anything to compel an officer to activate it, unindicted co-conspirator Chad too will feel the result.

(His should be mounted such that it impacts "the storm.")

Interestingly Rachel Smith talked about asking the FBI's Doug Hart about the true meaning of "storm" on the witness stand at Chad's trial. It was her idea and Hart wasn't too keen on it.

 

[Diddian]

Interestingly Rachel Smith talked about asking the FBI's Doug Hart about the true meaning of "storm" on the witness stand at Chad's trial. It was her idea and Heart wasn't too keen on it.

I watched her talk about that. Sounds like Hart is the consummate professional, but I side with Rachel on this. No need to leave the reality of the interactions between the two out of the case because a bit prurient, particularly since fulfillment of sexual infatuation was as significant a motivator as financial profit was. Even if, in the case of Chad, we are likely talking more a slight, quick breeze than a fierce and unyielding storm.

 

[justme11]

Since they are perpetually connected by portal, I think it only right that Chad also wear a "RACC" belt at the same time so if LVD does anything to compel an officer to activate it, unindicted co-conspirator Chad too will feel the result.

(His should be mounted such that it impacts "the storm.")

Bwahahahaha!!!!

 

[Megnut]

How does LVD think she can use NE to perjury witnesses? He's a reporter, not an attorney. They're interviews, not depositions! No one he interviewed was under oath!

But of course she just didn't want him in the courtroom. Vindictive sombit.

JMO