GUILTY AZ - Officer Anthony Holly, 24, fatally shot, Glendale, 19 Feb 2007 #3

[CarolinaMoon]

Come on, Juan, pull the witness out of the bag!

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 4s
Ok. Monday Dr Hayes will be dealt with #bryanhulsey

 

[MeeBee]

They'll deal,with it Monday.

Come on, judge.

I should have known better than to get into another AZ trial. My better judgment was telling me no but I just had to. Ugh...

 

[YESorNO]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 13s
Ummm Jen Willmott just walked in here #bryanhulsey

you what?!

:snake: in the court :scared:

 

[geevee]

She's doing reconnaissance.

 

[MeeBee]

@TrialDiariesJ: Defense says they have new info that the Maui facility #bryanhulsey was at had lawsuits against it for sexual and physical abuse of kids

Let it in! No appeals!

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 37s
Defense says they have new info that the Maui facility #bryanhulsey was at had lawsuits against it for sexual and physical abuse of kids

and? he never said he was sexually abused :/

 

[YESorNO]

So now he's sexually abused!!!

Come on.

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 5s
Judge says no to defense wanting to bring in this evidence #bryanhulsey #Maui

 

[MeeBee]

@TrialDiariesJ: Judge says no to defense wanting to bring in this evidence #bryanhulsey #Maui

Ok, well, if he says so...

 

[geevee]

Hey, if JM can't get Dr. Hayes and her 200 pages in, why can defense put this "new" info in??

 

[geevee]

The circus has come to town.

 

[MeeBee]

Sexual AND physical. You never know. An appeals judge could look at this as pertinent evidence that should have been let in.

 

[MeeBee]

Hey, if JM can't get Dr. Hayes and her 200 pages in, why can defense put this "new" info in??

GAH! Right?!?!

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Thank you judge! Odds are he wasn't abused and the def. just found out about some lawsuits. Nothing to do with the case here.

 

[geevee]

Sexual AND physical. You never know. An appeals judge could look at this as pertinent evidence that should have been let in.

Shouldn't it have been brought up before? Like in disclosure?

 

[YESorNO]

The jurys not there, right?

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Defense got the bad stuff from Hulsey, himself. If he'd suffered such abuse, it would have come up. Then, JM found all the positive stuff about the experience and pretty much why BH wasn't a "good fit" with his stealing, destroying equipment.

 

[MeeBee]

Shouldn't it have been brought up before? Like in disclosure?

They probably just found it. I thought they could bring in new evidence if it helps their case. Seems the judge is just saying no because he don't think it'll be relevant. It just worries me. I've seen cases turned over on appeal simply because an attorney didn't find certain evidence in time or a judge didn't let certain evidence in. I thought the goal here was to prevent an appeal. I don't see it helping BH very much because, yes, odds are he was not abused. But you still want to give them a fighting chance to prevent appeals.

IMO.

 

[geevee]

The jurys not there, right?

No, I'm sure the jury hasn't been brought in yet.