- Joined
- Jan 24, 2007
- Messages
- 3,285
- Reaction score
- 61
At first they weren't interviewing him as the suspect but as a witness. No Miranda warning required. He told them he came in and found them dead.....so they had every right to question him about what he told them. I don't fault them for knowing quickly he was lying.
I don't believe all the drama that the defense attorney tries to put out in the media but he is just doing his job and I realize that but in the end I highly doubt they will even need this boy's confession anyway. LE commented that they base this case on the evidence they have uncovered.
imo
I'm not sure where it says they took him in for questioning solely as a witness, if you know which article says that can you please re-post the link? I must have just skimmed over it because everything I read says pretty much the same thing:
The new article anthrobones just posted has a lot of great info."They became very accusing early on in the interview," Brewer said. "Two officers with guns at their side, it's very scary for anybody, for sure an 8-year-old kid."