- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 206,100
They are not his photos. They belong to whoever paid him.
Nope. Email the photographer and ask them who owns the copyrights on the Romero wedding photos. I am sure they will tell you.
imoo
They are not his photos. They belong to whoever paid him.
I think there is one of the family -- just not posed.
In the first link, 6th or 7th from the bottom. VR & TR are dancing & I believe -- totally imo -- the childeren dancing V's children -- brother and sister. In the pic prior, VR is holding a little girls hand and just behind a boy. I think the child in question.
The photos are from the photographer's site, advertisement in a way. He picks which ones go on, I'm sure the family had lot's of good pictures of the boy.
A woman who was sent to prison for murdering her Marine husband and then found to be innocent when they found out he wasn't murdered at all but died of natural causes.
That is what everyone said about her because she partied shortly after his death and got a boob job.
I think there is one of the family -- just not posed.
In the first link, 6th or 7th from the bottom. VR & TR are dancing & I believe -- totally imo -- the childeren dancing V's children -- brother and sister. In the pic prior, VR is holding a little girls hand and just behind a boy. I think the child in question.
I think this is the little boy too.But the little boy to the right in that other picture looked too thin to me.But who knows.Who was the little boy with the hat on?Is that Mr Romero standing there with him and holding a little girl.
I think there is one of the family -- just not posed.
In the first link, 6th or 7th from the bottom. VR & TR are dancing & I believe -- totally imo -- the childeren dancing V's children -- brother and sister. In the pic prior, VR is holding a little girls hand and just behind a boy. I think the child in question.
ETA: Link http://sierrablancophotography.blogs...-johns-az.html
I absolutely noticed those pics, as I was the one who pointed them out a few pages before lol...that being said, it appears they're just candids where CR (assuming it's him) just happens to appear in the background...unlike the many "posed" of the new bride and groom. I just find it odd the photographer would not post one of the "new family" if there were so many to choose from, as, in my opinion, there should have been.
The way I see it is, this is THE day she became a mother, and I know as a woman, I would certainly want my brand new son to play a huge and prominent role in "our" wedding day, it's not just the day she became a wife, but also a mother...if she really was this positive and loving influence in his life that he affectionately referred to as mom...these pics just show me that that was quite clearly not the situation going on here...that's all...doesn't make her guilty of pulling a trigger, no, just pointing out an observation. Seeing as this wedding took place 2 months prior, I find the family dymanics factor in this case to be intriguing to say the least....
I think this is the little boy too.But the little boy to the right in that other picture looked too thin to me.But who knows.Who was the little boy with the hat on?Is that Mr Romero standing there with him and holding a little girl.
Read this and you guys tell me what you make of it, it's from the excellent link that Minachica found
"Everything happened around 5 PM that day, but Tiffany sent us a fax out of no where, and she
said she just "felt" like it had to be said, and she said it hit her hard. It is amazing to me how the
spirit can prompt us in all sorts of ways. There were feelings this whole day that she should just call her husband and apologize, and say I love you, thirty minutes before the incident happened. And the little boy had a feeling to not go home yet, so he walked around the block for a long time.I just am thankful we have the gospel in our lives."
http://bethanygentry.blogspot.com/2008/11/tragic.html
Certainly sounds like Tiffany and Vincent had a fight the night before or that day. I have put parts in Italics.
(remember that this blog is Tiffany's friend and was posted before they made an arrest of the boy)
So, you see similarities how? IMHO, I do not see anything remotely in the same context. That was that case, this is this one...
Yes, it does. And, she knew that the child walked around for a bit before going home. Why is that? It's also interesting she sent via fax. Who does that? Email, phone call, or a text I can see. But, a fax?
A fax would be sent so there is more solid proof of it being sent. A phonecall wouldn't be recorded and someone could just delete a text.
"Solid proof". Why would she need proof of sending a personal fax to someone concerning her murdered husband? Just being Devil's Advocate here...![]()
So, you see simularities how? IMHO, I do not see anything remotely in the same context. That was that case, this is this one...