I would sign my fiancee up for that experiment, 100%. We have only been together for 7 years, but he works around good looking cocktail waitresses, one on one with many people, and I know he's never cheated. He doesn't have time. He's always here

Straight to work, straight home. Conversely, I have many, many close relationships with my male friends. I frequently have lunch with men, one one one. Even with my exboyfriend! My fiancee is always invited, but doesn't always go. My fiancee is secure and has every reason to be. They don't make passes at me, because they respect me, and my relationship. And if they ever did make a pass, I would inform my fiancee immediately, and limit my contact with that person.
If any man ever told me to follow you "rules", i would be out the door in a heartbeat, thinking they had lost it. I am a mover, very independent, and very secure in myself and my relationships. If someone told me to follow those "rules", I would assume that they are insecure, and didn't trust me. I need privacy, and space! Privacy isn't about hiding something, but about personal boundaries.
The only "rule" I agree with is number 5. Also, my spouse and I share passwords, but it was never a rule...we just do it, because we occassionally need in one anothers accounts for stuff. The rest of those "rules", I feel, are unhealthy, and controlling. But each relationship is different, and different things make different people feel secure.
Also, Dr. Phil is not my moral compass. I don't just trust what I see on tv. Not to mention, we have no way of knowing that Dr. Phil has not cheated on his wife, or that his marriage is healthy.
But we are very different people, with different relationships, and everyone has what works for them. That's what is important.
I just hate how this went from Casey/Baez assumptions to, it seems, stereotyping men, and assuming other posters are "naive" just because we don't keep our husbands on lock down, or think men will cheat.