Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is it exactly!

I think most people do not care one bit about where she is; it's just that when we hear about where she is, it reminds us yet again that she is not where she should be.

Nicely put and so true!
 
Here's the thing LG, I do agree with you. Personally I don't think we should say things that just aren't proven to be facts. Here we are trusting People magazine, twitter post's, and what-have-you. It make's me nuts. Why can't we be satisfied with knowing she isn't our neighbor cuz I'll tell you if she was my neighbor I'd expose her in a micro second to get her out of my neighborhood and I can't imagine that there aren't people who feel the way I do. You know? I mean how many regular people would willingly get into some conspiracy thing for the like's of her. This is just my opinion of course.

You make an excellent point and one I hadn't even considered - thank you! And yes, I agee - if she was in my neighbourhood, I'd be the first to take pictures, call the media, stick post-it notes on her door - to "encourage" her to move along out.
 
...and when I was reading about why Adam Longo got the interview, he was quick to say that Casey in some way felt betrayed with the last Piers Morgan interview...and now another interview? Well, if it was a new one...then I'm very confused.

"It's my understanding from both Cheney Mason and Casey Anthony personally that the conversation with Piers Morgan was off the record, and she told me she was upset when she saw the program air where everything she said to him was paraphrased," Longo said.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...30126_1_casey-anthony-cheney-mason-adam-longo

But but but......wasn't the whole point of her call to Piers to say she wasn't fat????? :floorlaugh:
 
Anyone watch Piers Morgan tonight? Apparently he had Cheney Mason on
to talk about Casey.:boohoo: the gist of what I've seen reported is that she is not reconciled with her family since "they" tried to get her killed via Grand Jury testimony ( I think that means George) and she filed bankruptcy to avoid all these attorneys who are trying to sue her for their own vain need to make a name. I'll get the transcript later.
That is from the horse's mouth as it were, but that doesn't mean it's the truth either. :rolleyes:
I just don't get why these TV stations continue with force-feeding us stories about Casey Anthony. They seem not to understand the outrage people feel.

OOOh the plot thickens...we can always count on Cheney Mason to pop in with his two cents. This is after all - HIS client....:floorlaugh:

Somewhere in the middle of all this there has got to be at least one grain of truth....
 
And just one more thing before I wander off to bed - I don't believe either George or Cindy has made a "public statement" to the media since Lippman has been their lawyer.

:offtobed:
 
What really bothers me about this bankruptcy thing is that Casey has to be living off funds from somewhere. It has been said that she gets "gifts" from people; some were apparently sending her money in jail and have continued to help her out financially since she got out. But it is difficult to believe she brings in enough that way to live on for this long a time. The cost of living just about anywhere these days, even a modest existence where one never buys anything but the absolute basic necessities, never goes out to eat, etc., is significant. So, IMO, either her parents have been/are funnelling money to her or to her attorneys for her keep...or she is bringing in a lot of cash via gifts. Or both. And if either or both are true, will the bankruptcy court just ignore those amounts not being itemized? It was reported that her filing document claims various gift cards of unknown value. Will the bankruptcy court not question the carp out of that claim?

I hope they do, because I believe they would for anyone else. But I am bothered thinking they won't, because I fully expect this unusual person to get special treatment from yet another court.

The whole thing reeks.
 
What really bothers me about this bankruptcy thing is that Casey has to be living off funds from somewhere. It has been said that she gets "gifts" from people; some were apparently sending her money in jail and have continued to help her out financially since she got out. But it is difficult to believe she brings in enough that way to live on for this long a time. The cost of living just about anywhere these days, even a modest existence where one never buys anything but the absolute basic necessities, never goes out to eat, etc., is significant. So, IMO, either her parents have been/are funnelling money to her or to her attorneys for her keep...or she is bringing in a lot of cash via gifts. Or both. And if either or both are true, will the bankruptcy court just ignore those amounts not being itemized? It was reported that her filing document claims various gift cards of unknown value. Will the bankruptcy court not question the carp out of that claim?

I hope they do, because I believe they would for anyone else. But I am bothered thinking they won't, because I fully expect this unusual person to get special treatment from yet another court.

The whole thing reeks.

Speaking of which, does she have to list all the money she was given while in jail? Did she list that as income? Would those commissary funds and cash out (when released) be income?
 
BBM

Just wondering out loud, but I wonder if both can be true. IF the lease was signed by Casey (crazy thought, I know, but bear with me), but George was a co-signer, it could be reasoned that George did "get" the condo for her because realistically speaking, she has no wherewithal whatsoever to obtain housing on her own. Yet with his signature, he IS providing it as there is no good reason to lease to someone with no job, no assets, etc.

I do know a person who did co-sign a lease for a person who had been convicted of a felony, had no assets, and had just started a job after being unemployed for quite some time, so I know that can happen. It was also done to help the person re-establish credit and get back to being a productive member of society. So I can see this as a possibility.

It would also make sense to me that she would list the realtor in her BK because IF she did sign the lease, she is the principle party on the hook for the money, not George. I'm not real familiar with how things work in BK, and if this is the case, I'm not clear if the BK judge would allow the realtor's money to be included in the BK if George did in fact co-sign the lease.

Like I said, just thinking out loud. :twocents: :moo:


BBM-I think it is common knowledge that a co-signer becomes legally responsible, when a principal borrower defaults on a debt. I'm not sure a Judge would be interested in why a person made the choice to co-sign?? I'm not totally familiar with how things work in a bankruptcy either. However, I don't think a person can bankrupt on a debt another person is legally responsible for. :)
 
OOOh the plot thickens...we can always count on Cheney Mason to pop in with his two cents. This is after all - HIS client....:floorlaugh:

Somewhere in the middle of all this there has got to be at least one grain of truth....

Yep, THE Cheney Mason--has a tremendous amount of clout in the state of Florida. I think he may be key to all the special treatment Casey is receiving.
 
Yep, THE Cheney Mason--has a tremendous amount of clout in the state of Florida. I think he may be key to all the special treatment Casey is receiving.


Those lawyers are attracted to FCA like flies to sh###t. :floorlaugh:

Cant wait till she eventually turns on them....actually that may have already happened...
 
somebody's paying her bills and somebody's expecting a big old chunk of the payout.

I do think People magazine is a cut above the rest but I also think they've deliberately kept their coverage slanted Casey's way in the hopes that they get the big story. That's kinda People Mag's thing. They like to be first so yes they're circling the story and Casey's team keeps throwing chum into the water. But Casey is a one hit wonder of a story. More will be pissed than will applaud. And if she doesn't answer the real questions, no one will see her interviewers the same way either. My big issue is the OS her attorney, acting for her, gave. I want her to clearly say if it was true or if she lied. If true, Georgie's got some major 'splaining to do as does Cindy.
If false, then Casey Anthony has not only caused some lack of faith in our Justice system but has also severely wounded the fight against child molestation.
At that point it will be interesting to see her enablers clear that up for us.



funny thing, even when it's in print form I can't seem to fully understand everything Mr Mason says.
 
I can't imagine FCA or GA signing a lease when she may have to leave at a minute's notice because of all the "threats" out there.

Does anyone remember up thread that it was said that FCA was staying in a condo owned by an old family friend? George may have set it up with no lease and
she may be staying there free of charge.

If someone owns a condo where they can get away whenever they feel like it, wouldn't it be easier to keep the utilities on all the time? Maybe that's why she doesn't have any utility bills.

As far as the realtor on the BK filing, maybe FCA/GA had signed an agreement on another place and reneged on it? Weren't there some pictures taken through a window by a resident showing FCA moving in and later walking around? Was that this place or another place?

Sorry I don't have any links to back any of this up.
 
Speaking of which, does she have to list all the money she was given while in jail? Did she list that as income? Would those commissary funds and cash out (when released) be income?

What I remember is having to show how much we had when we filled out the paper work. Ya know, checking, savings, cash on hand and stocks, bonds, 401k all of that kind of stuff. Unless she does get special treatment I would think she'd have to put in the amounts.
 
Yep, THE Cheney Mason--has a tremendous amount of clout in the state of Florida. I think he may be key to all the special treatment Casey is receiving.

I appreciate you reminding me (us) of this because I've only ever heard of him in the FCA case as second chair, appearing to nod off and losing his temper inappropriately, etc. Not very impressive IMO so it's interesting to hear he is respected as a "legal somebody" in Florida.
 
somebody's paying her bills and somebody's expecting a big old chunk of the payout.

I do think People magazine is a cut above the rest but I also think they've deliberately kept their coverage slanted Casey's way in the hopes that they get the big story. That's kinda People Mag's thing. They like to be first so yes they're circling the story and Casey's team keeps throwing chum into the water. But Casey is a one hit wonder of a story. More will be pissed than will applaud. And if she doesn't answer the real questions, no one will see her interviewers the same way either. My big issue is the OS her attorney, acting for her, gave. I want her to clearly say if it was true or if she lied. If true, Georgie's got some major 'splaining to do as does Cindy.
If false, then Casey Anthony has not only caused some lack of faith in our Justice system but has also severely wounded the fight against child molestation.
At that point it will be interesting to see her enablers clear that up for us.



funny thing, even when it's in print form I can't seem to fully understand everything Mr Mason says.

I didnt know anyone was still questioning whether the OS was true or not:waitasec: ...and i certainly wouldnt trust FCAs word for anything. She will most definately slant her story to suite her current needs..whatever brings her the most attention and $$$$$.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
177
Guests online
501
Total visitors
678

Forum statistics

Threads
625,781
Messages
18,509,904
Members
240,845
Latest member
Bouilhol
Back
Top