Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix

Status
Not open for further replies.
Attorney Richard Hornsby has found an inconsistency in Casey Anthony's bankruptcy filing. In 2010 Casey Anthony signed an affidavit, claiming indigency, stating that her attorney Baez fee was $ 89,000 [and "NO OTHER COMPENSATION"...] ... now in the bankruptcy filing she is saying Baez is owed $ 500,000.

Casey Anthony also wrote in her bankruptcy filing that she gave Baez rights to PHOTOS of herself. page 39 - listed under "Other transfers"


And, why is Andrea Lyon listed as a Creditor, when the Indigency affidavit says she was working PRO BONO and received no fees, and only received $ 22,500 and would receive "NO OTHER COMPENSATION".....


Twittter
RichardHornsby@RichardHornsbyFYI @MattMorganESQ @JeffWeinerOS #Casey Anthony executed a 2010 affidavit saying Baez' fee $89K; now $500k?

http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2010-07/55220170.pdf

8 page PDF

5. Here, as Ms Lyon appears pro bono ....

8. The Affidavit of Attorney's Fees from Miss Anthony ... indicates that the
$ 22,500 has been paid to Ms Lyon has been used directly to cover
those costs outlined by subsection 29.006 such as transcripts, travel,
and investigation. Ms Lyon has not received any fees. She has been
and continues to appear pro bono



page 8

INDIGENT FOR COSTS AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES

[identical afffidavit signed for Ms Lyon stating $ 22,500]

I, Casey Marie Anthony am represented by Jose Baez in the above entitled action. The estimated amount of fees for the attorney named above in this case is
$ 89,454.83 dollars. The fees paid or to be paid to the attorney were or are being paid by: Casey Marie Anthony ...
No other compensation, things of value or funds have been paid or are anticipated to be paid in the future to the attorney in this case from any other person or source. The attorney represents me in other cases as follows:

Case No: 2008-CF-013331-A-0 Fee: $ 0.00

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Indigent for Costs Affidavit of Attorney's Fees and that the facts in it are true.

3-3-10 signed by Casey Anthony

Hold on! Hold on! I need to put down my drink....just a second

:silly:

BWAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH :lol: :laughcry::floorlaugh:

Do we have a copy of the complete Indigent for Cost Affidavit of Attorney Fees?
 
Hold on! Hold on! I need to put down my drink....just a second

:silly:

BWAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH :lol: :laughcry::floorlaugh:

Do we have a copy of the complete Indigent for Cost Affidavit of Attorney Fees?

I had to put mine down after I read your post! :skip: :skip: :skip:
 
What I have enlarged and underlined may be the loop hole that these underhanded people will get away with once again?

Richard Hornsby is tweeting about that...

Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby
@JaJasTweets @MattMorganESQ @JeffWeinerOS Contract is a contract. Baez was required to disclose to all $ owed or anticipated to be owed.
 
Richard Hornsby it tweeting about that...

Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby
@JaJasTweets @MattMorganESQ @JeffWeinerOS Contract is a contract. Baez was required to disclose to all $ owed or anticipated to be owed.


Oh it just keeps getting better........:rollercoaster: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
 
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...y-bankruptcy-meeting-20130302,0,6546480.story

Casey Anthony out of hiding Monday, faces questioning in bankruptcy

During under-oath questioning, Anthony could be forced to shed light on what she's been doing, and who's been supporting her, since her acquittal in her daughter's death in July 2011.

However, ambiguity in Anthony's bankruptcy paperwork could draw a trustee's eye: For example, she also indicated that she "may have relinquished rights to photographs" of herself to Baez. Their value is listed as "unknown."
 
Bankruptcy Affidavit
http://www.baynews9.com/content/dam...y-Anthony-middle-district-bankruptcy-0126.pdf



Linda Kenney Baden is also listed as a creditor, unknown claim and as a consultant.
LKB stated during one of the Hearings that she tore up her retainer agreement see BBM below


[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5846946"]Prosecutors Ask For Hearing On How Baez Is Getting Paid - Page 18 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

Remember this little exchange, with Baez under oath?
ADA George: "We had a meeting in chambers and an amount of money the defense had was dicussed. How much money was that?
JB: That information is under seal.
ADA George: You are under oath now.
Judge Stickland: Yes, you can answer. It believe it needs to be on the record, the amount and frankly the source too.
ADA George: What was that amount of money discussed?
Baez: Two hundred thousand dollars.
ADA George, loud and clear for the reporters in the back row to hear, asked Two hundred thousand dollars?
JB: Yes.
What was the source of that money?
JB: Can you repeat the question?
ADA George, loud enough to be mistaken for a politician giving a speech at a podium asking for votes: Where did the money come from?
JB: "American Broadcast Company" he said under his breath.
ADA George: "Who?"
JB: "ABC".
Although he already knew the answer, ADA George adding emphasis: "ABC News?"
JB, after swallowing hard: "Yes"

It was Linda Kenney Baden's demeanor in this hearing that made me say to myself that was her goodbye scene. That is the biggest and possibly the only time I have even seen her so warm and smiling. She is doing something I had never seen her do, playing to the camera. Andrea seemed to be saying goodbye to Casey as well, even then.

Losing these two on the defense team was HUGE, imo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnkhUbRbwBU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaZnZ50R5m0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brCKA_FTB6g

Thttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVxt_F_-V78
This was the first hearing of Mason on the case. He started showing off before the hearing even began by being quite rude to the folks who were court personnell , basically ordering them around about what HE wants done regarding the microphone needing to be removed, iho, right damn now, from the defense table. Good for the gentleman, he showed him no mind at all about it. Funny.

He called the Judge's staff member, Kathy, "Doll".
Mason literally called Jeff Ashton "Ignorant" on the record, in open court.

He was very patronizing to Judge Strickland with his "I bet you'll trust ME" mantra, and saying he had experts lining up to work for free, that indeed Henry Lee had worked for a crate of oranges once".

After the hearing he emerged with his it's going to be fun nonsense.


Here is the hearing. A must see

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54JbOxl30U0
The person video taping chimes in briefly as she looks up who is this man, full of hubris, on the internet. Funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzy83OX_t3A
Here we go they are back from their little pow wow (the defense). This is where Baez testifies ( best ever)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-HhNWPqINI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kYb9DfPq6E
Here Baez admits to receiving 70K from Todd, and the Judge literally asked him, if Todd paid contingent upon him joining the defense team.
ADA George: "Besides Mrs. Lyon and Mrs. Badem, are there other lawyers involved in this case?"
"Other attorneys have consulted, none have been paid."
ADA George:" How about experts?"
JB: "Some have been paid"
ADA George: "Any promise of future payment?"
JB: "None."
ADA George, " Who has been paid?"

wait for it....
Cheney:" I am going to object to disclosing names, it invades the privileldge in preparation of our trial strategy."
Judge Strickland "I will sustain the objection as to their names, the amounts we need".
ADA George: "Can you give us the amounts?"
JB: "I would be guessing".
Judge Strickland "I will sustain the objection as to their names, the amounts we need".
ADA George: "How many experts are there that have been paid so far?"
Stutering JB: " Umm, umm, I didn't bring that with me. I would be guessing."
Baez offered to bring that to the court, he did not bring those things with him but he could supply them to the court. THe judge agreed to that.

Me: What the hell? How do you come to a hearing about how you spent the money, and not bring your file?

ADA George: "What about investigators?"
ADA:" How much have they been paid this far?"
JB: "They have been paid through the clinic. ( Andrea's clinic ) I have paid them , the amount would be um,very little".
Me: Richard Hornsby sure called that one. Baez had been pinching pennies rather than , getting the work done. For example we recently learned that Jeremy Lyons has billed the taxpayers eight thousand dollars for talking to TES searchers. Those TES documents had been sitting, available, for so long and Baez chose not to begin work on them. Now with the state paying, suddenly it is getting done.
go to the four minute mark
ADA George: What about Mrs. Baden. Is she being paid?"
JB: "She is not being paid. Correcting himself it seemed, he added, "She has been paid nothing."
Mrs. Baden does she have a promise of future payment?

After a long pause, JB: "You know.... I haven't read that document in awhile. I wouldn't be able to testify to any degree of certainty".
ADA George: "In March, in our in camera meeting with the judge, Mrs. Baden was to bring that document to the court. Do you have any idea why it hasn't been filed?"
JB: "It has been dropped off to the court."

ADA George asks the judge if that is true, and he answers he isn't sure, "It may be here, it may not be here,I have no idea".
Immediately after this, Mrs. Baden stands up to interrupt. Baden claims she tore up her retainer contract. In the words of The Church Lady on Saturday Night Live,
"Well isn't that special?"
She did manage to get in a little bit about her self tauting her work , pro bono with The Innocence Project, how she donated her services then too. She explained that she rescinded her agreement with Casey Anthony since she had never been paid and there clearly was no expectation of future payment.

Me: Loose translation....NO THE COURT WAS NEVER GIVEN TO THE COURT. THAT'S MY GUESS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC0Xtr917ZY
Cheney tried to chime in that the JAC would need to pay for travel expenses. No one responded. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_12H80h6wL4
Mason was very rude saying Linda and Jeffrey approach the bench with me. Mrs. Drane-Burdick said "We have last names".
2:09 mark is where it seemed to me Andrea was telling Casey goodbye. I thought this because all of the lawyers would have went to the bench normally, and Andrea and Linda did not.
The lady recording the video briefly opines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpjZ1bL1eIg

They had a ora tenis motion heard at the bench, Baez wanted more time to read all the jailhouse letters. The judge agreed, but told the defense whatever objections they file they must notice the media.


I believe, iirc, that this indeed is the time they went in camera after the hearing and let Judge Strickland know they were filing notice asking him to step aside.
If they haven't been kicking themselves already, bet when they see the difference between Judge Strickland letting them promise to drop stuff off to him later, and how Judge Perry is going to demand to see the documents for payment, now, not on their honor......they are going to see asking to swich judges was very, very misguided.
In the words of Mark Nejame, "I am being overly generous in my characterization!"
 
I am bumping some threads regarding OCA's attorney's asking for her to be declared Indigent for costs.

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4830193"]Casey is indigent? Now what? - Page 5 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
This thread is closed so I could not bump it..

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5846946"]Prosecutors Ask For Hearing On How Baez Is Getting Paid - Page 18 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 
So are we thinking her bankruptcy lawyers are unaware of the signed indigency statements FCA swore to? :waitasec:

A bankruptcy lawyer would be above trying to pulling a fast one on a trustee - wouldn't he? Or did FCA "forget" to tell him??? :what:

Was that actually a question I just asked?..... :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: silly me....
 
Defendant's Motion for Determination of Indigency for Costs

http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2010-07/55220170.pdf

This Motion by the Defendant states Andrea Lyons appears PRO BONO, that she was paid $22,500 to cover costs ie Travel, transcripts, investigation but that she has been and continues to appear PRO BONO

This Motion also states that OCA has received NO INCOME since being incarcerated( HMMMM I think the IRS considers the $200,000 from ABC as Income)

NOTE:
On OCA's Application for Criminal Indigent Status signed March 3, 2010(attached at the end of the Motion)
Under the Heading I have other Income..she circles NO for everything including the last one "Other Kinds of Income not on the List"

The ABC money was income,
 
Regarding FCA signing away her rights to some of her pictures, Richard Hornsby has this to say a few minuts ago...

Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby

So #CaseyAnthony claims Baez may have acquired media rights to pics during case? Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.8 prohibits this: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/482043D3FC06842B852571710054B87B …

:giggle:

I like the MAY HAVE...she may have given him the rights to photos? Ya right...either she did or she didn't..me thinks she did. :twocents:
 
I like the MAY HAVE...she may have given him the rights to photos? Ya right...either she did or she didn't..me thinks she did. :twocents:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=98255&page=2
Momtective Post #43

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...y+(TV+Guy)

Do we know if these are the pictures we are talking about? Baez was boasting he used an ethics lawyer during the ABC deal - so did she sign away other pictures before the end of the case?

I understood these particular pictures he sold on her behalf - so that's why they seem to be reflected as her income to the IRS.... Or do we know how that worked for sure?

I'm getting confused....... :confused:
 
Do we know if these are the pictures we are talking about? Baez was boasting he used an ethics lawyer during the ABC deal - so did she sign away other pictures before the end of the case?

I understood these particular pictures he sold on her behalf - so that's why they seem to be reflected as her income to the IRS.... Or do we know how that worked for sure?

I'm getting confused....... :confused:

I posted , then I deleted...let me take a moment to re think LOL
I may have confused you, and me...LOL I will delete part of my last post
 
Twitter:
Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby
So #CaseyAnthony claims Baez may have acquired media rights to pics during case? Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.8 prohibits this:
http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrt...2571710054B87B
RULE 4-1.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST; PROHIBITED AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
March 3, 2013

http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/01/26/CASEY_ANTHONY_BANKRUPTY_FILING.pdf
page 39
"10. Other transfers"
NAME AND ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE...The Baez Law Firm
9/9/2011
"Debtor may have reliquished (sp) rights to photographs of Debtor. Value unknown"
 
Twitter:
Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby
So #CaseyAnthony claims Baez may have acquired media rights to pics during case? Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.8 prohibits this:
http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrt...2571710054B87B
RULE 4-1.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST; PROHIBITED AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
March 3, 2013


http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/n...PTY_FILING.pdf
page 39
"10. Other transfers"
NAME AND ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE...The Baez Law Firm
9/9/2011
"Debtor may have reliquished (sp) rights to photographs of Debtor. Value unknown"

Thank You ThinkTank!!

She states in her BK filing she "May Have" relinquished photos of herself to Baez on Sept 9, 2011, he was still her lawyer at that time

I have not read nor seen Baez's book..but did he have pics of OCA in his book?
Was he planning on or had begun to write his book back in Sept 2011 and wanted photos of OCA?

I hope the BK Trustee asks her "did she or didn't she?"
What is this "may have'......seems to indicate some unethical or fraudulent dealing from Baez
 
Thank You ThinkTank!!

She states in her BK filing she "May Have" relinquished photos of herself to Baez on Sept 9, 2011, he was still her lawyer at that time

I have not read nor seen Baez's book..but did he have pics of OCA in his book?
Was he planning on or had begun to write his book back in Sept 2011 and wanted photos of OCA?

I hope the BK Trustee asks her "did she or didn't she?"
What is this "may have'......seems to indicate some unethical or fraudulent dealing from Baez


Ah - much better thank you both ThinkTank and Intermezzo! And no Intermezzo - it wasn't your posts that were confusing me - it was me trying to get some kind of logical process for who, how, when that was doing it and the ethics lawyer thing popped out and i was self correcting or something that confused me.:great:

So now I guess we need to know if on September 11, 2011 - he was still considered to be "on the case".
I remember Mason hollering that Baez's job was done when the verdict was read. However what that statement means legally seems to be still up in the air.

All vedddy veddy interesting!
 
Regarding FCA signing away her rights to some of her pictures, Richard Hornsby has this to say a few minuts ago...

Richard Hornsby ‏@RichardHornsby

So #CaseyAnthony claims Baez may have acquired media rights to pics during case? Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.8 prohibits this: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/482043D3FC06842B852571710054B87B …

:giggle:

This is getting interesting... I just hope someone reports this to the Fla Bar, and the BK court.
 
This is getting interesting... I just hope someone reports this to the Fla Bar, and the BK court.

This is going to get good. I think they may have finally went too far in their shady dealings. Way too far. Does anyone know if we'll get a transcript from the questions and answers tomorrow or are those private. I've been out of the loop with this and don't know how it works.
 
Richard Hornsby has uncovered a huge inconsistency.

RichardHornsby@RichardHornsby

FYI @MattMorganESQ @JeffWeinerOS #Casey Anthony executed a 2010 affidavit saying Baez' fee $89K; now $500k?
http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2010-07/55220170.pdf

I think they conspired together to boost this number, solely to make her look broker than she really is, for the benefit of the BK court.

:thud:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
170
Guests online
518
Total visitors
688

Forum statistics

Threads
625,793
Messages
18,510,206
Members
240,845
Latest member
Djsco510
Back
Top