- DM wanted/needed a diesel truck for Baja and I believe he decided he was getting that truck come hell or high water
- DM asked AM who "he" should steal the truck from (not "we"). IMO, that is an indication DM was the planner for the mission and MS was not included in all aspects of that plan
- No evidence exists in either the field or the Yukon to indicate that Tim was killed there
- DM initiated the fake text when, if MS was privy to a planned murder, there was no need for MS to leave the truck when they both could have continued with TB in the truck without raising TB's suspicion. I believe the fake text was to ensure that MS was not in the truck so that nothing would go wrong with DM's plan. Otherwise why the fake text at all? If it was both DM and MS planning to kill TB, I see no need for the fake text. They could have just continued the test drive without raising TB's suspicion and both be present for the killing someplace else. IMO the fake text was DM's way of getting MS out of the truck early in the game so that he was alone to carry out his plan.
- Window of opportunity (the total length of time DM was driving the truck vs the length of time MS was in the truck)
- DM's letters to CN solidified for me the depths of his deviousness and attempts to perfect and twist a situation
Do I believe it's possible they both carried out the murder? Possible yes, but I have to give consideration to MS's testimony (whether 100% truthful or not) and give the benefit of the doubt. His testimony is evidence, and as for his story/testimony being geared to evidence presented throughout trial, it is his trial and it is the evidence that he has to address or refute the best way he can. I found his 'story' plausible and for that reason, believe it was a wise move to have him take the stand.