The screenshot of the Riverside property with the hose and the police markers.. it looks like (to me) that part is a patch of browned grass, while the rest of the grass seems to be green (please correct me if I'm seeing things incorrectly). That leads me to wonder, but it is just stupid to wonder such a thing imho, if there had been perhaps a tarp on that patch of grass, which tarp had perhaps been hosed off and then left for a few days (May 7th to 10th?), which caused the browning of only that patch (which looks to me like it could be from something having been on top). It was early May, and I'm not sure of the recent weather conditions at that time in 2013, but none of the other grass appears to be brown. Could he have hosed down the bloody tarp on the lawn there, left it to dry, then a couple of days later, realized his goose was cooked, went to fetch it, saw the browning, and perhaps also that there may have been traces of the stuff he had washed off the tarp onto the lawn, and so had V run the hose on the area for TEN hours.
I guess it would have made MUCH more sense to just burn (even if not in the incinerator), or drop off in someone's trash can in some neighbourhood somewhere, the inexpensive tarp, rather than to wash it, and re-use it to cover the burned out seats... so that is why I can't imagine spending all that time to clean off the tarp, and spend all that money in water consumption, for a $12 tarp that could provide evidence of murder.
If he had used the hose at Riverside to wash the tarp, even if the browned area had nothing to do with anything, he could have perhaps wanted to ensure there were no little traces of tissue, etc., left behind on the lawn?
Any thoughts on the running-water-for-10-hours issue?
