sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,010
In the middle of a sensitive, open investigation, the public does not have the right to know ALL of the facts. Why should they tell us that right at the start? They are still verifying everything and maybe they don't want any other potential accomplices to know how much they know or don't know.
They do not owe us all of the known facts while they are still figuring out who else is involved. it is dangerous for them to do so, imo.
I agree that the public doesn't have the right to know ALL the facts during an active investigation. I don't expect to have ALL the facts right away. But I also don't expect to be led to believe that the FBI didn't have a clue about the country of origin of a dead suspect who is in this country on a K1 visa. That's ludicrous, IMO.
I would have to be a complete idiot to believe that the Feds didn't know where Malik was from when they were asked last night by reporters. I suspect that many MSM viewers who heard that disinfo last night lapped it up without question. I did not.
IMO, there was no reason for the FBI/LE/investigators to withhold that info.
If I'm misled/allegedly lied to about anything, it causes me to suspect everything.
If we disagree as to the alleged reasons for withholding that info, I'll let it go.