That's sad for missing people who slip through the net of public awareness. I suppose hard-pressed local authorities have to continually make judgement calls about budget needs and priorities. Cases in the news are always going to be bumped to the top of the agenda, while unidentified human remains that no-one particularly seems to be looking for, just have to wait their turn, I guess.
What a nightmare for families waiting to see if it's their loved one though. I've experienced a little of that, but it was only days and I was almost certain from the beginning that the police were going to find who they were looking for - I felt it in my bones, as they say. Even though it was such a shock at the beginning to discover police thought my uncle had murdered my aunt. Once I knew, I knew. For those who have been waiting years, and there's a glimmer of hope but dread as well, waiting everyday to hear the phone ring.....
In Bob's case, of course, there's someone out there dreading LE will find him, but that's the choice they made when they disappeared him and they just have to live with the consequences.
I have just seen a case of a man who went missing in Ohio in 2009 resolved. Poor man was found in his own basement and nobody had thought to search it. The house was closed up after he went missing, then recently sold. It was only when the new owner began renovations he was discovered. I searched, but he doesn't seem to be on WS. Heartbreaking. His life ended and the world just went on rolling, scarcely turned a hair.
Although it's always the scenario that can keep me awake at night, my sensible head knows that Bob is not in his house or garden. I don't think he's gone very far though. I think he is quite nearby, waiting patiently to come home.
In the first case of its kind in Orange County, a decades-old murder mystery in Santa Ana has been solved with the help of DNA from the suspect's relatives.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=8873247
1.2. Intent to kill not always required
You can be convicted of murder even if you did not intend to kill the victimfor example, if you accidentally killed someone while committing a dangerous felony (the "felony-murder" rule ).17
With special circumstances murder / capital murder, intent to kill is required if the conviction is based on some kinds of special circumstances. But for other kinds of special circumstances, you can be convicted -- and sentenced to death or life in prison without parole -- even if you didn't specifically intend to kill someone!
1.3. Aiding and abetting
You can also be convicted of special circumstances murder (capital murder) in California even if you didn't personally kill someone. The law makes it possible for people to receive the death penalty or life in prison under Penal Code 190.2 PC for aiding and abetting a murder , as long as one of the special circumstances applies.20
However, for a person to be convicted of special circumstances murder for acting as an accomplice to a murder, the jury in most cases DOES have to determine that s/he intended for someone to be killed.21
The only exception to this is if the murder took place in connection with the commission of certain felonies . In these cases, an aider or abetter can be convicted even without intent to kill, as long as s/he was played a major role in the felony and acted with a "reckless indifference" to human life.22
So, even manslaughter combined with special circumstances can make you DP eligible or at least LWOP.
I will link the homicide defense attorney website where I found this information-the practice I found talks alot about their strengths in pleading down special circumstance murder cases.
LINK HERE
This section of the penal code also piqued my interest:
OXYGEN network on Cable TV has a series called Snapped. I have never watched it but someone brought this episode to my attention:
Sandra Jesse, Placentia CA, was tried and convicted of murder in the death of her third husband. She didnt want to pay for his cancer treatments any longer and she wanted access to his 401K benefits etc.
It was ultimately the testimony of her son that caused her conviction.
Here is a LINK to the OC DA press release regarding the case.
This trial included charges of murder for financial gain, and I want to explore for myself what the criteria and the punishment for that charge would be. I thought it was a DP aggravator, but I cant remember.
MP Cases are expensive to boot. If you dont find them relatively quickly, the amount of resources that need to be spent are considerable. If you look at a Dept like PPD, undoubtedly cash strapped like all of the departments are, and if you start thinking about dogs, GPR, drones, pulling video tapes, searches of the canyons in the area...that is a lot of cash. And a lot of manpower.
Add into that equation people close to the victim who arent willing to talk or who give possibly actively misleading stories...well it is like a rabbit hole.
Which is why boards like these can be so helpful- we have thousands of people who can sleuth, contact media, get flyers created and posted. And we have access to people like Oriah and gitana1 who can help us not only understand the mechanics of the case, they can be some of the resources needed to help move it to a resolution.
Now we need to multiply it by give or take hundreds of thousands....peeps, get on your jurisdictions to get their cases entered into NAMUS. Offer to help. NAMUS has a civilian component to it-tell your local and state ME's that you will volunteer to do it.
Just imagine if we could get all of the John/Jane Does into the system and all of the MP. The system could work the way it was designed to....think of all of the people who would finally have some answers.
From the Websleuths Resources thread:
Isnt this something??
I'm getting bogged down here - can anyone direct me to a post of events as they happened, roughly?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.