CA- Body (IDd as Celeste Rivas Hernandez) found in vehicle at Hollywood tow yard, abandoned Tesla registered to singer D4vd – 8 September 2025 #2

[katydid23]

This is really interesting information, and level headed. They have 7.4 million subscribers. So they are very respected.

I learned a lot and it is hard to summarise, but it is short and sweet. You could start around 4 minutes in and then it's only 14 more minutes of a good interview with a knowledgeable LA Attorney.

Basically it is about the most likely outcomes concerning the current Grand Jury on this case.

They do give credible reasons showing that there is pretty certainly a current Grand Jury proceeding of some kind concerning this case. They know that to be true because of all the witnesses connected to this case that have been seen in the GJ courthouse.

Like the Tour Manager, and other employees of D4.

They discuss the POSSIBLE types of Grand Juries it could be. Maybe an Investigative process, and not one that can indict?
But then again, SOMETIMES an investigative GJ is also allowed to vote to indict IF it meets the evidential threshold.

No one really knows for sure which kind it is yet though. ALTHOUGH the DA that has been seen onsite is the Major Crimes DA, so some think she wouldn't be spending so much time there herself if it was just in investigative process?

And they pointed to certain clues in recent LE statements which indicate that D4 might be the suspect being looked at.

And also a discussion about why it seems it is possibly more than just a low level charge like disposing of a body.

It's worth listening to, I believe.

 

[HollyHunter9]

This is really interesting information, and level headed. They have 7.4 million subscribers. So they are very respected.

I learned a lot and it is hard to summarise, but it is short and sweet. You could start around 4 minutes in and then it's only 14 more minutes of a good interview with a knowledgeable LA Attorney.

Basically it is about the most likely outcomes concerning the current Grand Jury on this case.

They do give credible reasons showing that there is pretty certainly a current Grand Jury proceeding of some kind concerning this case. They know that to be true because of all the witnesses connected to this case that have been seen in the GJ courthouse.

Like the Tour Manager, and other employees of D4.

They discuss the POSSIBLE types of Grand Juries it could be. Maybe an Investigative process, and not one that can indict?
But then again, SOMETIMES an investigative GJ is also allowed to vote to indict IF it meets the evidential threshold.

No one really knows for sure which kind it is yet though. ALTHOUGH the DA that has been seen onsite is the Major Crimes DA, so some think she wouldn't be spending so much time there herself if it was just in investigative process?

And they pointed to certain clues in recent LE statements which indicate that D4 might be the suspect being looked at.

And also a discussion about why it seems it is possibly more than just a low level charge like disposing of a body.

It's worth listening to, I believe.

Yes I have listened/watched this and found it very helpful explaining some of the legal aspects of what is possibly happening behind the scenes. I'm from UK so I'm not always familiar with the US legal system and how it works.

 

[katydid23]

Wonder what the other related items are?
Can't think of what "accessories" one might order to go along with a "burn cage".

"The burn cage and other related items were delivered to the residence under a false name, although the deliveries were accepted at the property." (From the link in above post)

There was also a mention of an electric chainsaw that was also delivered to the house, but unopened.

I know the incinerator was ordered under a fake name but delivery was accepted. I wonder if the chainsaw was too?


Geragos tried to give a defense explanation for those things, saying maybe it was to clear the brush for wildfire safety etc. lol

First of all, the rental tenants would not be the ones to do that.
Second, they had a gardener that would have the necessary equipment and manpower.
Third, the owner would be responsible for that kind of upkeep, not the music industry tenants.
And from the overhead pictures, there is no heavy foliage that would call for that.

Geragos also said that if there was no blood or DNA on the tools then it would not be important. I disagree.
Just the act of ordering the tools, under a false name, to the premises, imply there was some kind of intent behind it.
True, they never actually used them. But maybe they were going to do it when the returned from tour?

 

[AnyNameIWish]

I know the incinerator was ordered

I'm not going to defend this David but it wasn't an incinerator. It was literally a box with 5 metal panels. Used to create a cage structure so people in rural areas can burn stuff for some reason.

Definitely nothing I've ever seen in my years of living in California. But it does not have a heat source and it's not an incinerator.

These are the words and verbiage used by the investigator that IMO is making the public believe things that aren't true. Even those little things matter.

 

[redflag71]

There was also a mention of an electric chainsaw that was also delivered to the house, but unopened.

I know the incinerator was ordered under a fake name but delivery was accepted. I wonder if the chainsaw was too?

I wonder if those items were for the music performances on stage or for using in a music video before the body was discovered.
Halloween was coming also. MOO

 

[katydid23]

I wonder if those items were for the music performances on stage or for using in a music video before the body was discovered.
Halloween was coming also. MOO

Possibly but doubtful, imo.
Reasons why not== why use a fake name?
Why send anything to the house? They have a huge crew that handles props and set direction. A music video would order that stuff through the record company and have it delivered to the prop master, tour director, set director or producer.

 

[flowershop]

It sure is taking time..

This Brian Entin News Nation report cites TMZ as saying that witnesses will be called to give grand jury testimony until at least February.

At 18 min 54 sec. An interview with 2 Angry Men podcaster Mark Geragos follows.

 

[flowershop]

At 20 min into this Brian Entin interview with Mark Geragos, Mark describes a fight between LAPD and the Medical Examiner. He says that the LAPD has tried to shut down the Medical Examiner through the court system. Mark Geragos says the Medical Examiner is not "singing from the same script" as LAPD which is why there is a need for the grand jury process. This way they can get witness testimony and experts outside of the Medical Examiner as to the manner and cause of death of CR.

 

[tlcya]

I wonder if those items were for the music performances on stage or for using in a music video before the body was discovered.
Halloween was coming also. MOO

@redflag71 Welcome

 

[HollyHunter9]

Nancy Grace discussing more info with SF. Turns out the property maintenance was kept up by the home owner only, so there would be absolutely NO need for the renter to need an incinerator or a chainsaw for "garden landscaping" and those size incinerators are also illegal to use in LA. Both items were purchased AFTER January 2025. They are also discussing why the police did not take them into evidence and why they did not finger print the boxes. SF also confirms they were bought under the name of a female who does not live at the property.

Surely there will be an online digital trail for all of this?? I cannot believe we are in 2026 and celeste still does not have justice!

 

[HollyHunter9]

There is also new info in here too. A neighbour's dog passed away in Feb 2025 and they buried it in their back garden, but keep smelling decomposition and thought they had not buried the dog deep enough. After the Tesla was moved from outside their house the smell went away.

The new red Tesla was also leased on 1st Feb 2025.

Looks like a timeline is finally starting to piece together.

 

[HollyHunter9]

Also wanted to add with regards to the latest Nancy Grace video I posted above...SF also states that the incinerator was ordered online but was paid for using a pre paid gift card.

Would be interesting to know if gift cards can be traced (via their barcode) to where they are purchased from regardless of if they were bought using cash or card ?

 

[flowershop]

Nancy Grace discussing more info with SF. Turns out the property maintenance was kept up by the home owner only, so there would be absolutely NO need for the renter to need an incinerator or a chainsaw for "garden landscaping" and those size incinerators are also illegal to use in LA. Both items were purchased AFTER January 2025. They are also discussing why the police did not take them into evidence and why they did not finger print the boxes. SF also confirms they were bought under the name of a female who does not live at the property.

Surely there will be an online digital trail for all of this?? I cannot believe we are in 2026 and celeste still does not have justice!

The burn cage was purchased using prepaid giftcard(s). Just another suspicious detail...

 

[HollyHunter9]

The burn cage was purchased using prepaid giftcard(s). Just another suspicious detail...

Exactly!! Why go to the effort of buying a gift card which would then have no attachment to your name or bank account (if paid for using cash) to then use it to purchase an incinerator using a fake (female) name, but yet accepting delivery of it at your rented address? It all just looks more and more suspicious...