- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 20,086
- Reaction score
- 55,524
The greenbacks... Money, money, money.Yeah this is a headscratcher. What's the motivation for this? God complex?
This one, IMO, is on a shelf of its own. WTH?
The greenbacks... Money, money, money.Yeah this is a headscratcher. What's the motivation for this? God complex?
RBBMI’m wondering if this is the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.
Have investigators had the opportunity to go through all of the agencies records? Are there more children and are they all accounted for?
i’m guessing she feels a connection to the child after carrying them for nine months, and she was probably shocked finding out what happened. i can imagine that would make her want to take care of them, and protect them from more bad things happening to them, even if it originally was never the plan. jmo.I don't understand the surrogate Mom of one of the children wants the child back? No biological connection. I really don't understand that. But, I can't wrap my head around being a human incubator. So. There is that.
but what greenbacks? so far all we know is they hired surrogates on the pretense that prospective adoptive parents wanted a baby but then never gave the babies to any prospective adoptive parents? Hence, one would think, no payday for them?The greenbacks... Money, money, money.
This one, IMO, is on a shelf of its own. WTH?
Anyone else had to read this a couple times? lmao
And what the parents do for a living to afford that house.I'm still letting this simmer....asking FOR WHAT actually?!?!?!?!?
Snipped from above & bbm...
“It’s kind of set up like a hotel with a big, giant lobby, and all the rooms are like suites,” neighbor Hobart Young said.
![]()
21 children - all with surrogate mothers - taken from couple amid investigation
A couple's 21 children - all from surrogate mothers - have been placed in protective custody amid an investigation.abc7chicago.com
"Many of the children were birthed through surrogacy and then the male and female at the residence took legal guardianship of those kids," Cieadlo added.
Six other children, investigators say, had been moved to other homes. All 21 of the kids were confirmed to be the children of 65-year-old Guojun Xuan and 38-year-old Silvia Zhang.
Makes way more sense now...I'm confused! So, the couple are the biological parents of all the children. I'm going to assume they paid women to be a surrogate to carry the embryos to birth and then the women gave the babies to this couple. This part of the situation doesn't seem to be illegal. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
The discovery of abuse when a baby went to hospital with injuries has opened up the uncovering of abuse of multiple children seemingly by multiple nannies. THIS is the part I don't understand.
I initially thought that this was a way for this couple to secure babies for private adoptions at huge prices. That doesn’t seem to be the reason as they kept them and abused them.
What was the end game?
Zanny, the nanny? Is there any proof of actual nannies, or just a convenient scapegoat? *ETA Nanny is real, caught on video abusing a little.
Who is behind the now shuttered surrogacy agency?
And where is all this money coming from?
That house!
I have questions.
JMO
I'm still letting this simmer....asking FOR WHAT actually?!?!?!?!?
Snipped from above & bbm...
“It’s kind of set up like a hotel with a big, giant lobby, and all the rooms are like suites,” neighbor Hobart Young said.
She carried and birthed the child. You don’t understand that connection? She was lied too, knows the child is currently in foster care. Likely feels she would be a better option for raising the child. I completely understand and applaud what she wants to do.I don't understand the surrogate Mom of one of the children wants the child back? No biological connection. I really don't understand that. But, I can't wrap my head around being a human incubator. So. There is that.
Just want to point out, the couple say they are the genetic donors. But do we know that for certain? Before I believe that, I’d need third party testing.I'm confused! So, the couple are the biological parents of all the children. I'm going to assume they paid women to be a surrogate to carry the embryos to birth and then the women gave the babies to this couple. This part of the situation doesn't seem to be illegal. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
The discovery of abuse when a baby went to hospital with injuries has opened up the uncovering of abuse of multiple children seemingly by multiple nannies. THIS is the part I don't understand.