cluciano63
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 41,198
- Reaction score
- 27,342
i think i read that he was visiting his mother for a few days, which is maybe something he did often enough to be comfortable in the area...
You know I was thinking about the report of this guy being arrested with caked mud on him. I thnk it was originally reported waist high but then someone else said knee high ...do we know the level of mud on him exactly? Was it waist or knee high? Need clarification on this info.
Also is the lake muddy in certain areas and if so what areas of the lake are muddy?
Another thing to consider is .....was this person burying something and got muddy or was this from being in the lake? How cold is that lake at this time of the year? And if this mud was all over him wouldnt that in of itself leave a trail of his movements?
If this person was identified quickly after the dna was found on Chelseas panties than perhaps the LE and FBI had him under surveliance soon after those items were found.
I would also like to know when the SO's family moved into San Diego ? Has anyone been able to check the public tax assessor records for information on home ownership. If they rented than that would not be helpful. I get a feeling this guy has been around this area for awhile to be so comfortable. It doesnt sound like he just started living there a few days back as reported earlier.
TravelingBug, do we know if they are using the Cadaver Dogs yet on the park and surrounding area? I know they had the tracking dogs and were quite clear they were not cadaver dogs. I know I am assuming the worst but we have not been given much in the way of good news lately.
I still question how muddy he could be and Hernandez Hideaway let him come in. I really wonder if that's been a bit exaggerated...plus, he had to know that would attract attention to himself, don't you think? And I can't seem him wanting to do that.
You know I was thinking about the report of this guy being arrested with caked mud on him. I thnk it was originally reported waist high but then someone else said knee high ...do we know the level of mud on him exactly? Was it waist or knee high? Need clarification on this info.
Also is the lake muddy in certain areas and if so what areas of the lake are muddy?
Another thing to consider is .....was this person burying something and got muddy or was this from being in the lake? How cold is that lake at this time of the year? And if this mud was all over him wouldnt that in of itself leave a trail of his movements?
If this person was identified quickly after the dna was found on Chelseas panties than perhaps the LE and FBI had him under surveliance soon after those items were found.
I would also like to know when the SO's family moved into San Diego ? Has anyone been able to check the public tax assessor records for information on home ownership. If they rented than that would not be helpful. I get a feeling this guy has been around this area for awhile to be so comfortable. It doesnt sound like he just started living there a few days back as reported earlier.
Since Gardner is from Lake Elsinore, there is the possibility that he used the Ortegas to hide her body, if he killed her. Many bodies have been found out there. But in the forefront of my mind Im gonna have hope she is alive.
Just a thought....(though I haven't found anything online to confirm he had mud on him)....perhaps he had dried mud on his legs UNDERNEATH whatever he was wearing when he was arrested. As if he was wearing shorts in the mud and then put on a pair of clean jeans over the dried mud before going into the restaurant? The mud wouldn't be noticeable until after he was arrested and stripped of his clothes. Again, just a thought, if the report of him being caked with dried mud is accurate that would explain why no one noticed it in the restaurant.
Are you speculating that they may have found her panties or is this something you have heard from some other source? Do we have any inside info on what searchers have found?
I think it is a complete outrage that this's previous offense was lewd & lascivious acts on a minor under 14 and he was out free to take down more victims. These people cannot be rehabbed. When a sexual crime is committed against a minor, particularly under 14, the perpetrator should be locked up and just throw away the key. How many times do we have to go down this road before changes are made?