I'm going to have to call it a night ~ and send up some prayers for Chelsea's parents. I feel so sorry for them right now. :cry:
:rose: for Chelsea, RIP
I agree, Panthera,
10,000,000 miles beyond sorry for them.
This never should have happened.
I'm going to have to call it a night ~ and send up some prayers for Chelsea's parents. I feel so sorry for them right now. :cry:
:rose: for Chelsea, RIP
Apparently, the message hasn't gotten through to girls/women that they CANNOT go jogging/hiking/walking in isolated areas. Do they think because they are physically fit, they can outrun or overpower an attacker? I don't get it!
from what i understand, they basically had to do the plea in order to keep the little girl from having to take the stand and this probably happens a lot more than we know...another Catch-22 situation.
But there was no reason not to use the maximum available under the plea agreement and that is what is unforgivable in this instance. I do not think there should be a range; everyone who assaults or molests a minor should be given the maximum for that crime.
:woohoo: Then we could all go the police station and picket it till they let her go!Hi everyone. I thought I would share this link, since I haven't seen it posted yet:
http://www.10news.com/news/22723155/detail.html
(Sorry if its already been posted)
Apparently Amber's mother had watched/followed Gardner (and other sex offenders in the area) after Amber's disappearance. The Escondido police didn't look into Gardner as a suspect. Obviously, we don't know yet if Gardner had anything to do with Amber's disappearance but its interesting at least.
This isn't in that story but was on the news tonight: Apparently the police had threatened to arrest Amber's mother for this "stalking."
Anyone considered that his parents might have blown the whistle on him? Not saying they did, mind you, just that it is a possibility.If I were his parents..........blood on their hands too............hope they come forward with information to help confirm what they noticed when Amber went missing and anything else that may have happened like the Dec 28th attack.
Here's another article you may find interesting: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/mar/02/psychiatrist-urged-long-sentence-in-sex-offenders/
Longtime lurker yet posting newbie. I've lurked here since the Danielle van Dam case so I know how smart you Websleuthers are.
So I want to throw out my theory and see what you think. With apologies in advance for going a bit off topic, at least at first.
.................having gotten this off my chest. I too am local (hi, PQ neighbors!) and although I didn't really expect any other outcome, the "body found" news today punched me right in the gut and I am pretty emotional.
This has been eating at me all day. How did LE know Gardner was at Hernandez Hideaway on Sunday prior to them picking him up there? I saw today on the news that a piece of clothing and a knife were found very close to the restaurant. The thought ran through my mind that maybe Gardner turned himself in???
My daughter was 13 when a 30 year old brother of a friend of hers tried to molest her. We agreed to a plea to keep my daughter from having to testify. The PA would have went forward with the original charges if I wanted him to, but my daughter was not in any condition to testify in court. My main concern at the time was her mental health. That same summer, another friend was killed by her own father because he had gotten her pregnant and didn't want to anyone to find out.
Her friend and many of her classmates gave her a hard time about telling, I ended up sending her to a different school because she was getting harrassed so much.
I still wonder if I did the right thing.
Hate to say it, but women cannot sit in their own home (how many reports of rapist breaking into houses have we seen?), walk to their own car in their driveway, leave a store, walk down the block to their friends house, drive on the road (let's talk Cara Knott-pulled over and killed by a POLICEMAN). So exactly where are they supposed to hang out where it is safe?Apparently, the message hasn't gotten through to girls/women that they CANNOT go jogging/hiking/walking in isolated areas. Do they think because they are physically fit, they can outrun or overpower an attacker? I don't get it!
They discussed this on JVM today. The Judge Marilyn Milan said maybe it is time for witnesses to be required to testify, since far too often the result of a plea bargain is a JAG being released back into society.
Anyone considered that his parents might have blown the whistle on him? Not saying they did, mind you, just that it is a possibility.
Longtime lurker yet posting newbie. I've lurked here since the Danielle van Dam case so I know how smart you Websleuthers are.
So I want to throw out my theory and see what you think. With apologies in advance for going a bit off topic, at least at first.
What do the above three mentioned by SWAG have in common?
They are all named for females, and yes, nothing has really changed.
My theory is that these types of crimes, and the handling/punishment of the perpetrators, are not taken seriously enough because by and large the victims are female. If the epidemic were hitting young boys as frequently, our (mostly male) politicians might be goaded a little more into action.