CA - Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos) Wire Fraud Thread *Guilty* #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #761
Do y'all think she's going to sneak in under cover of darkness to prison or have a big hoopla outside the front gate?

I am waiting for another pregnancy. High risk, of course.
 
  • #762
  • #763
Two weeks is plenty of time.


This article is dated February 28, 2023, she gave birth to her second child before this article was printed, so...that would be, guess, around February 14. The article states DOB for 2nd baby was unknown. She could possibly be pregnant again, wouldn't surprise me a bit. After all, we predicted the other two pregnancies.

Although, probably doubtful. But, then again, nothing would surprise me here.
 
  • #764
  • #765

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.
 
  • #766

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.

She believes she is soooo spesh-ial!!!! of course the judge will do what she wants. I sure hope the judge does not give in to her "requests".
 
  • #767
  • #768
She believes she is soooo spesh-ial!!!! of course the judge will do what she wants. I sure hope the judge does not give in to her "requests".
See above post - the judge won't give in.
 
  • #769
So she wasn't able to get pregnant fast enough?
 
  • #770

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


From that article:

Holmes, 39, is due to begin her sentence on April 27 after a judge last week denied her request to remain free while she appeals her conviction. At the time her punishment was handed down, Holmes told the court, through tears, that she was "devastated by my failings" and "felt deep pain for what people went through because I failed them."

But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

The brief is 132 pages. Oh brother, let it go. No means no.
 
  • #771

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.he

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.
h T

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.
So the

Elizabeth Holmes is asking a judge to reverse her 'unjust' conviction or reduce her 11-year sentence one week before she's set to report to prison​


But in the brief filed Monday with the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Holmes's attorneys claim her original trial was flawed, producing an "unjust" conviction and a "severe" prison sentence. They argue that she was unjustly barred from citing Balwani's testimony in her own defense.

"Balwani's testimony is compelling evidence corroborating Holmes's defense that she did not intend to defraud investors with the financial projections or conspire with Balwani to do so," the attorneys wrote. Balwani was convicted on 12 counts and sentenced last December to 13 years in prison.

Holmes's defense team also argued that testimony from Theranos' former lab director, Dr. Adam Rosendorff — that the company's technology was "uniquely problematic" — improperly influenced the court, citing the fact that Rosendorff was not cross-examined and questioned about failings in other labs at which he worked.

For those reasons, the court "should reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial or, alternatively, remand for resentencing," Holmes's lawyers wrote.

Holmes has made several attempts to throw out her conviction, or to delay or reduce her sentence, in the past year.
So the conwoman thinks that her fraud conviction was unjust. That's hilarious!
 
  • #772
  • #773

Of course, the world is unfair. EH did absolutely nothing wrong. It was all Balwani's fault. She is a mother of two babies. She needs to be with them. On and on...must be nice to be married to an endless amount of money for attorneys.
 
  • #774
h T

So the

So the conwoman thinks that her fraud conviction was unjust. That's hilarious!
The only unjust thing about her conviction is that she was sentenced to less prison time than Balwani.

/IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #775
I saw there were new posts here - and figured she must have filed another motion to dismiss, extend time, etc. - yep - I was right.
I do not think she will even give up after this motion gets denied....
 
  • #776
Too bad she didn't apply some of this tenacity to accomplishing something notable other than being a complete fraud.
 
  • #777
If Balwani actually shows up and reports today, I hope it makes her quake in her boots. Tick-tock One week and counting Lizzy!
 
  • #778
If Balwani actually shows up and reports today, I hope it makes her quake in her boots. Tick-tock One week and counting Lizzy!

Flop sweat and desperation vibes and honestly, understandably so. She won't be raising her children and she'll be *checks notes* in prison. Her husband is quite a bit younger; for that and other reasons, I'd say there is zero chance he'll stay celibate and single for the next decade.

She's been living a good life under the umbrella of her very wealthy in-laws and that's all about to come to an end. It will be an absolutely brutal change. The good food, lovely husband, sweet children, nice house, spa days/facials/massages, all of it will be gone. She probably won't be eating bologna sandwiches on white bread twice a day but it won't be great.

She'll likely be in some type of cell/room with four other women, my personal idea of an unending nightmare.

The Hail Mary legal moves that won't go anywhere are just a wild hope that something, anything will stop the inevitable.
 
  • #779
Flop sweat and desperation vibes and honestly, understandably so. She won't be raising her children and she'll be *checks notes* in prison. Her husband is quite a bit younger; for that and other reasons, I'd say there is zero chance he'll stay celibate and single for the next decade.

She's been living a good life under the umbrella of her very wealthy in-laws and that's all about to come to an end. It will be an absolutely brutal change. The good food, lovely husband, sweet children, nice house, spa days/facials/massages, all of it will be gone. She probably won't be eating bologna sandwiches on white bread twice a day but it won't be great.

She'll likely be in some type of cell/room with four other women, my personal idea of an unending nightmare.

The Hail Mary legal moves that won't go anywhere are just a wild hope that something, anything will stop the inevitable.
Oh, but I want her to have to eat bologna sandwiches twice/day. No more "green juice" smoothies from Starbucks/Jamba Juice- wherever she was having her assistants get them. I can't remember.
 
  • #780
Sunny B. has reported to begin his sentence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
1,193
Total visitors
1,266

Forum statistics

Threads
635,620
Messages
18,680,722
Members
243,327
Latest member
MindMaven
Back
Top