CA CA - Emmanuel Haro, 7-months, reported kidnapped 7:30pm from Big 5 parking lot, Yucaipa Blvd, Yucaipa, 14 Aug 2025 *Arrest* #2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Unalienable Rights

Well-Known Member
Websleuths Guardian
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
12,859
Reaction score
58,202
  • #1

On August 14, 2025, at about 7:47 p.m., deputies from the Yucaipa Station responded to the 34000 block of Yucaipa Boulevard regarding a reported missing seven-month-old boy.

This is an active investigation, and we are seeking the public’s help in locating the child. He was last seen wearing a black Nike onesie, he weighs about 21 pounds, is approximately 24 inches tall, has brown hair, brown eyes, and is cross-eyed.

If you have any information, please call 911 or Sheriff’s Dispatch at 909-387-8313. No additional information is available at this time.


(Please read the comments following the Yucaipa PD post on FB. If true, this is a very alarming situation. Since the PD hasn't released the details, I assume that they are verifying the facts before making them public, but they wanted to circulate the baby's picture and description as soon as possible.)




Thread #1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2
EVERYONE PLEASE WE NEED LINKS..

You are posting great information but you have to back it with mainstream media links. I hate taking down posts but I will have to if you keep leaving off the links.

Thanks
 
  • #3
Websleuths Social Media rules are found HERE.

ALL WS rules are found HERE.
 
  • #4
For those who have been wondering why Emmanuel's parents are not being represented by the same attorney, under the California Rules of Professional Conduct:

Rule 1.7 :
"(a) A lawyer shall not, without informed written consent* from each client and compliance with paragraph (d), represent a client if the representation is directly adverse to another client in the same or a separate matter.
(b) A lawyer shall not, without informed written consent* from each affected client and compliance with paragraph (d), represent a client if there is a significant risk the lawyer’s representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to or relationships with another client, a former client or a third person,* or by the lawyer’s own interests."

There would be be a SIGNIFICANT risk that JH's lawyer's ability to represent RH would be materially limited by his responsibilities to JH (he couldn't adequately represent RH without throwing his other client JH under the bus). For each of them, their best bet for avoiding life in prison is to testify against the other one for the prosecution in exchange for a lighter sentence.
 
  • #5
More pictures of poor Emmanuel I see more I think he already had some brain damage before he went missing. His so called father should not be allowed to step his foot outside prison for the rest of his life for maiming his other child (3% of brain function, dear God, that's horrifying). Yet here we are. I wonder, is the judge that sentenced him able to look at his own face in the mirror now?
 
  • #6
OK, so the fathers attorney admitted on TV, that LE played a video for the parents. That video was cctv from the jewelry store across the lot from Big5.

The lawyer said that the video 'shows something falling down, then getting up.' And he then says that corroborates Rebecca's story. >>> NO, sorry it doesn't.

If it just shows her falling down and then getting up, with nobody knocking her out and running off with her baby, then it is not corroboration.

And AFTER LE shows them this video, they took cadaver dogs to the house, and they dug holes in the yard and dug under the flooring, looking for the baby.

go to 12:35 on the following link----to see the attorney say that^^^^ [interview with CBS local news]





I reported THAT^^^ link myself, to ask mods if the attorney interview would be allowed---I can't find the local news interview anywhere else yet
 
  • #7
OK, so the fathers attorney admitted on TV, that LE played a video for the parents. That video was cctv from the jewelry store across the lot from Big5.

The lawyer said that the video 'shows something falling down, then getting up.' And he then says that corroborates Rebecca's story. >>> NO, sorry it doesn't.

If it just shows her falling down and then getting up, with nobody knocking her out and running off with her baby, then it is not corroboration.

And AFTER LE shows them this video, they took cadaver dogs to the house, and they dug holes in the yard and dug under the flooring, looking for the baby.

go to 12:35 on the following link----to see the attorney say that^^^^ [interview with CBS local news]





I reported THAT^^^ link myself, to ask mods if the attorney interview would be allowed---I can't find the local news interview anywhere else yet
I found the video from MSM of that lawyer speaking ^^ - I'll post it in separate post in case this one doesn't stand.

jmo
 
  • #8
JH's lawyer speaks with local news about the video showing something falling and getting back up.

 
  • #9
Mass commenting on a few things from last post

Yes I do believe his issues are likely a result of abuse and will until shown medical records saying otherwise

Yes I do believe there is facial bruising (and a sore) in several of his pics

There are a couple of pics floating around in msm where he looks utterly lifeless except eyes open. He looks bruised and in a sort of veg state imo. I think these were likely his last photos and that’s why they are using them and probably not long before he passed imo
 
Last edited:
  • #10
JH's lawyer speaks with local news about the video showing something falling and getting back up.

I think this is really a big deal, that LE has video of RH, in her parking spot by Big5. I am pretty certain there is no sign of an abduction or her baby boy in that video.

That viewing of the video, while police were interrogating her, must have been excruciatingly awkward. Suddenly she KNOWS that they know. Her immediate reaction was to stop the interview and leave. But this isn't over.

I hope she gets her own attorney because her husband's attorney is going to try and pin it all on her, like he did with the assault upon the 10 day old baby. IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Does the lawyer think that she was hit by the invisible man??
 
  • #12
  • #13
Mass commenting on a few things from last post

Yes I do believe his issues are likely a result of abuse and will until shown medical records saying otherwise

Yes I do believe there is facial bruising (and a sore) in several of his pics

There are a couple of pics floating around in msm where he looks utterly lifeless except eyes open. He looks bruised and in a sort of veg state imo. I think these were likely his last photos and that’s why they are using them and probably not long before he passed imo

I agree.

Jmo
 
  • #14
Mass commenting on a few things from last post

Yes I do believe his issues are likely a result of abuse and will until shown medical records saying otherwise

Yes I do believe there is facial bruising (and a sore) in several of his pics

There are a couple of pics floating around in msm where he looks utterly lifeless except eyes open. He looks bruised and in a sort of veg state imo. I think these were likely his last photos and that’s why they are using them and probably not long before he passed imo
My question would be as to which came first - the abuse or medical issues. Did Emmanuel have fundamental health issues from the get-go (which may or may not have been obvious from birth) or was he a completely normal baby who was subsequently damaged by abuse?

Note: I am NOT suggesting that any health issues could excuse abuse of a baby, but a baby with fundamental health issues which mean that he or she is in constant pain or discomfort may cry and scream inconsolably for hours may drive even the most devoted parent to distraction. And we know that neither of the parents in this case fall into that category.

AFAIAA, there don't seem to be any photos of Emmanuel which show him behaving in a normal manner, in which case we wouldn't know whether he was ever a healthy baby.
 
  • #15
I hope she gets her own attorney because her husband's attorney is going to try and pin it all on her, like he did with the assault upon the 10 day old baby. IMO
My guess is she does have her own lawyer by now.

I simply cannot imagine a mother allowing her child to be out in the elements somewhere and not want to recover him. And that makes me wonder if they, in their own criminal way, "laid him to rest" somewhere that she feels somewhat content that he is at peace? Would that be a clue where to look?

Of course, I can think of at least one mother who put her toddler in the garbage so perhaps I'm overthinking the motherly instinct to protect and comfort.

jmopinion
 
  • #16
There are a couple of pics floating around in msm where he looks utterly lifeless except eyes open. He looks bruised and in a sort of veg state imo. I think these were likely his last photos and that’s why they are using them and probably not long before he passed imo
I agree with you about the pictures. I saw one in particular where if I didn't know he was alive in that picture I would have thought he was dead.

Even if RH had "fallen" in the video, how does the attorney think the baby was kidnapped if there was no one else in the video?
 
  • #17
My guess is she does have her own lawyer by now.

I simply cannot imagine a mother allowing her child to be out in the elements somewhere and not want to recover him. And that makes me wonder if they, in their own criminal way, "laid him to rest" somewhere that she feels somewhat content that he is at peace? Would that be a clue where to look?

Of course, I can think of at least one mother who put her toddler in the garbage so perhaps I'm overthinking the motherly instinct to protect and comfort.

jmopinion
Yes, and I think she helped cover this tragic mess up by helping dispose of th body and staging this joke of a crime.

But IMO, her vile husband probably battered this poor baby for his whole life, and RH was probably beaten as well. So she goes along with him like many battered partners do.
 
  • #18
Yes, and I think she helped cover this tragic mess up by helping dispose of th body and staging this joke of a crime.

But IMO, her vile husband probably battered this poor baby for his whole life, and RH was probably beaten as well. So she goes along with him like many battered partners do.

Frankly I don’t care at this point. Her kids are safe and she’s still not speaking up

But also there nothing that says this wasn’t more or equally her <modsnip>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Frankly I don’t care at this point. Her Luda are are and she’s still not speaking up

But also there nothing that says this wasn’t more or equally her <modsnip>
I haven't seen anyone defending her. Stating an observation about DV situations is not defending anyone's criminal actions, imo.

I think she is a victim of abuse at the same time I think she is implicated in this fake kidnapping case at the same time I worry about her current safety.....at the same time I do not defend her actions.

jmo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
Another update from Lauren @ HTC
Uploaded 7 hrs ago.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
3,106
Total visitors
3,222

Forum statistics

Threads
632,553
Messages
18,628,363
Members
243,195
Latest member
CaseyClosed
Back
Top