A couple of thoughts:
ETA: Tricia posted about race while I was writing. I don’t intend this post as an argument. I think we are in agreement.
Jen told the photographer “He has a big heart” to explain his tears. She also talked (on FB?) about Devonte confronting his fears at this demonstration. What kind of parent goes to or stays at an event that is clearly emotionally upsetting to one of their children? What kind of parent doesn’t provide comfort and safety for their children? If a child fears dogs, you don’t force them to go near dogs, and if they are crying you know you need to take care of them and console them. They used Devonte’s fears and tears for their own selfish agenda.
And this ties in with my second thought. This is all about race IMO (I’m not talking about racism). These two women would have gone unnoticed at this demonstration or any festival if their adopted children were white. But they wanted to be noticed, regardless of the effect on their children. No one would have photographed a white child hugging a policeman. No one would have attached a larger feel-good meaning to a white child hugging a policeman. It certainly wouldn’t have gone viral in any case.The Oregonian commentator cited upthread makes a valid point about Devonte being symbolic because of his color. These women used the color of their adopted children for attention and admiration and victimhood...to fill their own emptiness. And then they killed them, rather than being exposed for what they had done to these precious children.
What a perversion and slap in the face to the majority of people who adopt children of color for all the right reasons!
JMO, MOO, etc.
ETA: Tricia posted about race while I was writing. I don’t intend this post as an argument. I think we are in agreement.
Jen told the photographer “He has a big heart” to explain his tears. She also talked (on FB?) about Devonte confronting his fears at this demonstration. What kind of parent goes to or stays at an event that is clearly emotionally upsetting to one of their children? What kind of parent doesn’t provide comfort and safety for their children? If a child fears dogs, you don’t force them to go near dogs, and if they are crying you know you need to take care of them and console them. They used Devonte’s fears and tears for their own selfish agenda.
And this ties in with my second thought. This is all about race IMO (I’m not talking about racism). These two women would have gone unnoticed at this demonstration or any festival if their adopted children were white. But they wanted to be noticed, regardless of the effect on their children. No one would have photographed a white child hugging a policeman. No one would have attached a larger feel-good meaning to a white child hugging a policeman. It certainly wouldn’t have gone viral in any case.The Oregonian commentator cited upthread makes a valid point about Devonte being symbolic because of his color. These women used the color of their adopted children for attention and admiration and victimhood...to fill their own emptiness. And then they killed them, rather than being exposed for what they had done to these precious children.
What a perversion and slap in the face to the majority of people who adopt children of color for all the right reasons!
JMO, MOO, etc.