you just be quiet LOL I want to see her testify... her and Dan! LOL Why do you think she would not be good? I found it interesting that McGee said that she has said the same thing since Feb 2010, even when they threatened her that they were going to charge her ... I haven't listened to all of the new recordings, but last I heard from the judge, he told the defense all her prior statements, including the video of her being interviewed by SD detectives could be shown.
This is from the Jailhouse recordings Hearing:
McGee tells the judge, I can inform the court that the interviews that Ms. Jarvis had with LE, that is what she kept telling them, that is a review of the conversation, and the officers kept telling her that can't be right, you're wrong, he wasn't there, she like no, he was there, I saw his phone, she has said that since Feb 2010, and they started trying to trip her up, saying well what about this? and trying to change her testimony and change her statement, they were trying to realistically manufacture evidence that he wasn't home. And she was very clear in Feb 2010, she's been very clear in all emails with other people and very clear with SB, he was home when that phone rang, I saw it ring and I wondered why he wasn't picking it up. So this is not Mr. Merritt trying to convince Ms. Jarvis what to say, this is a rendition of the statements she has said since day 1. Even though LE tried to get her to change her story, I shouldn't say that, SBSD tried to get her to change that story, she has stuck to it, and she (someone says something).. McGee: even under threat of arrest, they were threatening her if you are going with this, then you're an accomplice and we are going to arrest you too, she still held her ground, that's what happened, and that's what the conversation was, it was not Mr. Merritt trying to tell her what to say, it was a reminder of the recorded conversation and the contents of it.
Judge: alright, that may be. I still think that conversation is relevant. If that conversation is played however, for that inference that Mr. Merritt was trying to get her to say certain things, then the defense would be able to put on the earlier statements to show that Ms. J didn't need to be reminded or convinced of anything, that she had said that from day 1 and continued to say that.