But not all felonies are strike offences. I think the confusion is because if someone had 2 strikes already, ANY felony was a 3rd strike (included things like shop lifting), that law has since been changed. But the first 2 strikes still had to be serious and violent. IMO his charges did not meet that criteria according to the Penal code.
From what I have read, first degree burglary and second degree burglary is different. Chase was charged with second degree burglary. He was also charged with grand theft, but only grand theft with a firearm is a strike offense.
In 2001, the Riverside County resident and father pleaded no contest to second-degree burglary and grand theft after authorities accused him of stealing from a San Gabriel Valley ironworks company.
Nine years after the McStay family disappeared, their accused killer heads to trial
I'm willing to change my mind and open to the possibility, but I need to see it lol I don't see it with what I have read so far...
No it just says Merritt's truck underneath it.
When did Chase sell his truck?
That sounds like he pled out to lesser charges, not the actual charges. With his criminal record, he wouldn't chance taking that to trial. I found it pretty difficult trying to find original charges in the California justice system.
2011, unsure if he sold it?
When SB found it, the guy that had it in 2014, bought it from Ritchie Brothers Auction in 2011.
Could be Bernina, but what he was ultimately convicted of still wasn't a strike offense. Doing reading, lawyers suggest to fight any and all charges and try to get them reduced, especially because of the 3 strike law..... they probably don't mind getting paid to do that either LOL
Somebody was questioning a storage unit that Joey and Chase might have shared that LE could find no evidence of. The warrant was for Storage Etc. - Formally AMS Storage in Pomona.
Missed that. That's what happens when I listen while doing something else lol. So if they didn't find this storage unit, where does this computer come from. Totally confused. And how is it they didn't keep records of past renters? Did they purge them when the new owners took over?41:57... there is objections, sustained... but he does say that they had some information from interviews about the storage shed, but not able to verify it. He says they didn't find a unit number or anything like that.
Missed that. That's what happens when I listen while doing something else lol. So if they didn't find this storage unit, where does this computer come from. Totally confused. And how is it they didn't keep records of past renters? Did they purge them when the new owners took over?
OMG I think the truck may have been altered! I've just found a photo of it on another site and the back is different.
Your photo : (vehicle as it is currently)
![]()
court photo - vehicle in 2014
View attachment 167463
Photo found on another site
![]()
Brake lights are lower, IMO. And it looks to me to be a different unit completely - much smaller rear opening. Do the prosecutors know this?
Some companies will send off their records to places like Iron Mountain to be destroyed after so many years. My wife had a small business for 5 or so years and we still have 10-15 boxes of invoices and records, so I can imagine what a place like that would collect.The computer tower was from the Storage company, the business, not property of Chase's or Joey's or anyone involved in the case, is what I understand Force Ten![]()
I don't understand how they didn't have the records still either, even with a company change. And even if they didn't have the records, I would have expected Joey to have made payments on it previously, so some paperwork, something. Even if LE didn't find it, I'm surprised the family didn't.
It was impounded for some reason. Maybe because of expired tags and he was driving under a suspended license? That's what he was pulled over for in VV in 2011.Maybe repossessed? So Ritchie Brothers had it in 2011 and Rising Sun Industries in 2014. Somebody other than CM could have modified the truck. This could be traced.
It had a different license. I wonder why that could be? Anyone remember where they discuss that? Could it be because it was modified?
Yes, different number altogether. They had to ID it by the VIN.It had a different license plate when they went looking for it in 2014, it that's what you mean? It was because it was licensed by a new owner, nothing suspicious about it. IMO I just heard that in Smith's testimony when listening to see if they checked to see if there were any modifications to the truck.