I was having a quick flick through Schroeder's cross-examination and I heard this little snippet earlier -
Start at 18.00 in video
Maline: And that Feb 8th 2010, does it have a time associated with it?
JS: Yes it does.
RM: And what is that?
JS: 2.08 am.
RM: Around the same time that we saw for the eMachine correct?
JS: Correct.
RM: Same timeframe 2.06, 2.07, 2.08
JS: Correct.
RM: And that's am correct?
JS: Correct.
RM: Does it appear that the 2.08 access was a site called MSN. com is that correct?
JS: Yes.
RM: And that in 2010 that was a common opening page, would you agree in 2010? MSN?
JS: Yes it was.
RM: Ok so does that activity there suggest that all that was done on the HP was that the computer was booted up to its opening page? Is that what that activity would suggest?
JS: Iwouldwouldn't say the computer was booted up but the application could have been opened, the internet explorer could have been opened, which was presented with that page yes.
RM: And there's no following searches like we saw on the eMachine correct - that you were able to identify?
JS: None are identified in the exhibit I'm looking at no.
So does this mean they agree the HP was not already on?
ETA strikethrough and word edit
Thanks Tortoise, so the HP appeared to be already on, just a browser was opened to its start page. And around the same time, someone was on the eMachine doing searches while the computer was going through an auto-set scan of some nature.
Hmmm....the close times of the searches on the eMachine bothers me for some reason, they just seem too close together for anyone to do who was looking for something, or even just busying themselves while paint was drying. Just a strange little issue that's bugging me. Thanks for the transcript and video.