I was just reading about that this morning in the preliminary hearing transcripts Part 3..
21 Q So, over five hours of no activity on the 5th?
22 A Correct.
23 Q Based upon your review of the defendant's cell phone
24 records for up to a year prior to this date, is that consistent
25 with his normal cell activities?
26 A I don't know if I can comment on that, 'cause I didn't
27 review the whole year to see if there were normal five-hour gaps
28 of time. I'm sorry. I would need to review that further to
1 comment on that.
I'm just guessing, but I bet they have gone back and looked since then and we might hear about that in the trial.