It's unfortunate that some reporter used this devasating event to stir controversy instead of public sentiment for a missing, elderly man who needs help. That said, I have to hope that many of us know the government's whip is arbitrary, devisive, and not always about about truth or justice. Sadly, these departments need to justify their budgets so they pick a target and with machine like precision, they destroy it. When they report to the powers that be, they get patted on the back for outrageous settlement amounts and their jobs are secure for another year.
In researching online for clues and information anout John, I came across more than one individual who praised John's hard work and committment to his career. I read about market newsletters he distributed starting in the 1970s that many looked forward to receiving. I came across a group of realtors who respected John and even a few who felt they owed their success to him and referred to him as a guru. There are many colleagues who spoke highly about John so it's a shame his character has been publically attacked and if it's a factor in LEs decision to offer minimal support, it's very unfortunate. I hope John's loved ones find their bearings and the strength to perservere. I have nothing but good wishes and hope for them.
Thank you for this! There is so much to be said--at a later date--about exactly what these accounts in the press have gotten wrong. But what you've discovered through your research is absolutely true. I'm impressed by your research and grateful for this post.