Excellent post DS. I agree about the legal maneuvering/trench warfare being standard, although unethical IMO, procedure.
Beck's business partners were NOT on the up and up. I've just spent a couple of hours googling Doug Gravink and Gary Hewitt. It wasn't hard to dig up dirt. Whether that dirt was available on Google when Beck connected with them around 2005? is anybody's guess. But an educated attorney should never join forces and allow himself to be used by anyone without vetting them. I can't believe he's as misled as the people who bought his product. His family seems to think he was, and I can see why they feel that way. I agree with them that John was a pretty small fish in a large net, captured by two master fishermen. But he IS an attorney, after all, more savvy than average I would hope.
DG and GH have been doing business together since the early 1990's at least...LOTS AND LOTS of business, including telemarketing. Take a look at this corporation wiki for the two of them.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/California/Van-Nuys/family-products-llc/46338998.aspx
It shows the interconnection of all their companies. You can click on each one and it will show a different chart. Here is a screenshot of the chart for Family Products that also shows the companies the FTC went after along with Beck...Paul, Alexander, Family Products, Mentoring of America. It's a little hard to read, but Beck and Paul are at the top and you can find the rest.
Speaking of Mentoring of America, they got in trouble in Utah, but just got lightly slapped. There was the belief that their contributions to the Attorney General's campaign helped.
In fact, the company has been under three separate investigations that resulted in administrative citations and one enforcement action by the Utah Attorney Generals Office, between 2004 and 2007. Not for drugs, however, but for allegations the company fraudulently promised unrealistic guarantees to customers, sold them programs they couldnt use and otherwise conducted deceptive trade practices. These investigations were brought by the Utah Division of Consumer Protection. The last time Mentoring of America was behind the 8-ball for alleged shady business practices, during winter 2007-08five months before Beckstead took his lifeMOA stood to potentially lose its license and have to eat $113,500 in fines and statutory penalties from the Division of Consumer Protection. In March 2008, however, the charges were dismissed, and MOA dodged a bullet and paid no fines.
MOA has managed to rack up quite a legal bill, having to defend itself against consumer complaints nearly every year since it opened its doors in 2002. Owned by Doug Gravink and Gary Hewitt, the company must be making some dough to pay those attorney bills. According to former employees, MOA, through the sale of programs teaching customers how to turn a profit from home tax-lien sales, made up to $1.2 million per week. And thats only from MOAs Utah County location and doesnt include numbers for the companys operations in Nevada and California.
And while this multimillion-dollar operation might not have been paying a lot in fines, the company was investing in political goodwill. In fact, on Jan. 16, 2008, almost a month after it received its most recent charges from the state, MOA contributed $20,000 to Attorney General Mark Shurtleffs 2008 re-election campaign. Three months after the charges were dropped by the Utah Division of Consumer Protection, Shurtleff would bank another $10,000 from the company, according to MOAs PAC report.
http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/called-into-question/Content?oid=2137457
Just to end on a lighter note, Hewitt applied for a patent for, among other things, a disposable kitty litter box! I guess they both learned how to cover their poop pretty well until 2008 when the FTC started digging it up.
http://patents.justia.com/patent/20040244708
http://patents.justia.com/inventor/gary-hewitt