GUILTY CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2

New Posts

This has been hashed and rehashed over the years and the fact remains that Scott Peterson wanted new and exciting as opposed to the beaming light of Laci and Connor and all the new responsibilities that came with fatherhood so he did what so many before him have done. He snuffed out that bright light, got caught, convicted and will now spend the remainder of his miserable life rotting away in prison with so many other murderers who also thought that they were smart enough to get away with it.

Too bad so sad. I personally don't need a video of him doing the deed, they proved to me beyond a reasonable doubt that Scott and only Scott did the deed. I find the feeble attempt to blame the bungling burglars beyond laughable. But it seems that is the best that a chosen few can come up with. And now he has his new and exciting life in his miserable little cell, dying a little bit each and every day. Hope he feels it was worth throwing his life away, cause that's what he did, along with the life of his beautiful wife who was so looking forward to motherhood and their unborn son.

But, feel free to waste your time defending the undefendable, someone needs to champion the lost cause.
 
Hey Everyone,
I need your help keeping Websleuths ad-free. Subscribe to DNA Solves and make a monthly donation. Five dollars or whatever you can do is greatly appreciated. That's all you have to do to keep the obnoxious ads off of Websleuths.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A MONTHLY DONATION TO DNA SOLVES
By subscribing and making a monthly donation, you will be helping the families finally get the answers they deserve.
Please do not discuss this on this thread. CLICK HERE if you would like to discuss further or have any questions.
Thank you,
Tricia Griffith
Manager/Websleuths.com
 
TallCoolOne said:
This has been hashed and rehashed over the years and the fact remains that Scott Peterson wanted new and exciting as opposed to the beaming light of Laci and Connor and all the new responsibilities that came with fatherhood so he did what so many before him have done. He snuffed out that bright light, got caught, convicted and will now spend the remainder of his miserable life rotting away in prison with so many other murderers who also thought that they were smart enough to get away with it.

Too bad so sad. I personally don't need a video of him doing the deed, they proved to me beyond a reasonable doubt that Scott and only Scott did the deed. I find the feeble attempt to blame the bungling burglars beyond laughable. But it seems that is the best that a chosen few can come up with. And now he has his new and exciting life in his miserable little cell, dying a little bit each and every day. Hope he feels it was worth throwing his life away, cause that's what he did, along with the life of his beautiful wife who was so looking forward to motherhood and their unborn son.

But, feel free to waste your time defending the undefendable, someone needs to champion the lost cause.
Click to expand...

I am simply stating my opinion, as are you, and as are the rest of us. Your opinion isn't fact and neither is mine. I would also appreciate if you perhaps conducted your responses in a constructive way. You are clearly extremely passionate about how you feel about this case and that is evident by your above response. But you don't need to to try to make your opinion superior to mine or others that think he is innocent by saying things like "But, feel free to waste your time defending the undefendable, someone need to champion the lost cause" - I personally think that was uncalled for. I have been nothing but respectful and constructive in my responses, even when I disagree with someone. I would expect others to do the same.
 
NetSleuth_41 said:
I am not saying that circumstantial evidence isn't credible, of course it is, however, when I look at this case and what was introduced as 'evidence', I am not convinced. And I am certainly not the only one that believes he is innocent. This case isn't black and white. If it was, we would not even be debating this. There would be enough evidence to say that 110%, he did it and we would all be in agreement.

And I know that Scott wasn't framed. Obviously, however, anyone that is guilty of a crime as heinous as murder is going to let anyone else suffer the consequences. The guilty party is going to want nothing more than for law enforcement to think it was someone else. They don't care who. And not all wrongful conviction cases happen because that person who was falsely accused was framed by someone or someone else said they did it. That certainly happens but it can't be applied to all cases.
Click to expand...

bbm

If 110% is needed to convict murderers and the like, we’ll never convict anyone.

Reasonable doubt is not the same as no doubt.
 
As authorities continue to search for Simpson, a 51-year-old mom of four who disappeared more than two months ago, her husband, Brad Simpson, remains behind bars, accused of killing his wife of 22 years. Unlike in the Peterson case, law enforcement did not wait to find Suzanne’s remains before charging Simpson with murder.

“Homicides are like a puzzle,” Williams told Fox News Digital. “Investigators are forever putting together pieces of the puzzle, and once they feel that they have enough evidence – circumstantial evidence or physical evidence – they will then move forward.”

Scott Peterson arrest months after Laci disappeared Christmas Eve may have been strategic: former homicide cop | Fox Wilmington WSFX-TV

Join Fox News for access to this content Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account - free of charge. By entering yo ...
foxwilmington.com
 

Premiered Jan 2, 2025 The Megyn Kelly Show | Full Episodes

"True Crime Christmas" comes to an end as Megyn Kelly is joined by former prosecutor and district attorney Matt Murphy, to discuss the latest developments in the story of Scott Peterson, including whether Peterson could actually get a new trial, the truth about "circumstantial" evidence in most murder trials, the decision by the Los Angeles Innocence Project to take up the case, the significance of the dog in the Peterson case, the truth about the reliability of eyewitness testimony, the power of juries to detect human behavior and use common sense, the claim that a "burglary gang" could have been behind Laci Peterson's murder, Peterson's suspect behavior after his pregnant wife went missing, and more.
https://bit.ly/3Aw93yw
 
windrower said:
bbm

If 110% is needed to convict murderers and the like, we’ll never convict anyone.

Reasonable doubt is not the same as no doubt.
Click to expand...
I watched the Netflix documentary this weekend. It's not all that hard to connect the dots--Scott goes fishing in the bay where the bodies wash up. He was making anchors. And the burglars were caught, their stolen goods recovered, the van and contents tested for Laci's DNA and they passed a polygraph. A random killer or killer would almost certainly have left the body. Moving her in that neighborhood and disposing of her in the bay would have meant putting her in a vehicle and transferring her to a boat; a person who moved the body would have wanted to create the illusion that she had been abducted. A random killer wouldn't need to create that illusion. Dumping her in the bay would have been to make it less likely the body would be found and a perpetrator would be prosecuted.

And who had the motive, having told his girlfriend his wife was "gone"? Just another family annhilator.
 
Last edited:
pittsburghgirl said:
I watched the Netflix documentary this weekend. It's not all that hard to connect the dots--Scott goes fishing in the bay where the bodies wash up. He was making anchors. And the burglars were caught, their stolen goods recovered, the van and contents tested for Laci's DNA and they passed a polygraph. A random killer or killer would almost certainly have left the body. Moving her in that neighborhood and disposing of her in the bay would have meant putting her in a vehicle and transferring her to a boat; a person who moved the body would have wanted to create the illusion that she had been abducted. A random killer wouldn't need to create that illusion. Dumping her in the bay would have been to make it less likely the body would be found and a perpetrator would be prosecuted.

And who had the motive, having told his girlfriend his wife was "gone"? Just another family annhilator.
Click to expand...
100%
 
pittsburghgirl said:
I watched the Netflix documentary this weekend. It's not all that hard to connect the dots--Scott goes fishing in the bay where the bodies wash up. He was making anchors. And the burglars were caught, their stolen goods recovered, the van and contents tested for Laci's DNA and they passed a polygraph. A random killer or killer would almost certainly have left the body. Moving her in that neighborhood and disposing of her in the bay would have meant putting her in a vehicle and transferring her to a boat; a person who moved the body would have wanted to create the illusion that she had been abducted. A random killer wouldn't need to create that illusion. Dumping her in the bay would have been to make it less likely the body would be found and a perpetrator would be prosecuted.

And who had the motive, having told his girlfriend his wife was "gone"? Just another family annhilator.
Click to expand...
Not only did he tell Amber that Laci was gone, he told her two weeks BEFORE she went missing. That's one hell of a coincidence. Guilty as sin. Jmo, moo
 
We're told Peterson got "beat up" by the other prisoner, but his injuries were not serious enough to land him in the hospital.

www.tmz.com

Scott Peterson Prison Pickleball Confrontation Leads to Assault in Yard

Infamous wife-killer Scott Peterson got an 🤬🤬🤬-whoopin' from another inmate in a California state prison -- in an altercation over pickleball, TMZ has learned.
www.tmz.com www.tmz.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
  • Locked
CA Alex Hernandez (5) - San Francisco CA, 2002
Replies
0
Views
3K
SheWhoMustNotBeNamed
S
T
  • Locked
GUILTY CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002
49 50 51
Replies
1K
Views
199K
MadMcGoo
MadMcGoo

Staff online

Members online

... and 179 more.
Total: 749 (members: 180, guests: 569)

Online statistics

Members online
180
Guests online
569
Total visitors
749
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
625,596
Messages
18,506,819
Members
240,820
Latest member
patrod6622
Back
Top