JDB
Tybee you will never be forgotten
Gee I wonder what # of notebook they are on?

What notebook? Unless the notebook is the massive tome of jury instructions, you'll have to explain it to me.Gee I wonder what # of notebook they are on?![]()
Hi BarnGoddess!What notebook? Unless the notebook is the massive tome of jury instructions, you'll have to explain it to me.
I think they're still trying to get through the instructions.:furious:
I couldn't quite understand the long lunch break either, now that the trial is over and they're deliberating. Don't they have lunch brought in to them from outside? I agee that Judge Fidler is priceless!I really like this judge!!! Seems very "in charge" and very human. However, I DO have a problem with the hours of work the jury is working. 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. with an hour and a half for lunch? Frankly, if I had already been on this jury for over four months, I'm wanting to stay there 12 hour days and just get it overwith.
I couldn't quite understand the long lunch break either, now that the trial is over and they're deliberating. Don't they have lunch brought in to them from outside? I agee that Judge Fidler is priceless!![]()
Thanks for that panthera. I did watch much of the trial on Court TV, but of course they cut it off at 3:00 MT, so we didn't get it all. Unfortunately, I missed what the commentators were calling a masterful summation by Jackson with his high tech presentation. Oh well, must have been the highlight of the trial. I hadn't realized that the jury took written notes. I don't believe it's allowed in all states. Is it?Hi BarnGoddess!The foreman is the one who took volumes of notes throughout the trial. I think that's the "notebook" being referred to ~ he has many of them!
Yes, they do have lunch brought in. I Know they're trying to give them a chance to get outside (in an enclosed area) and get some fresh air and maybe make a phone call or two during that time, but GEEZ!!!! I've been suck in my office for months at a time, 12-15 hours a day working on a case and it didn't kill me!!!! Get the freaking case over and done already!!!! We want a stinkin verdict!!!!! For crying out loud!
Whew. I feel better now.![]()
![]()
![]()
You can still see the closing arguments and trial highlights at CTV. Click on one of the news stories and there should be a video link. It's well worth watching the State's summation!Thanks for that panthera. I did watch much of the trial on Court TV, but of course they cut it off at 3:00 MT, so we didn't get it all. Unfortunately, I missed what the commentators were calling a masterful summation by Jackson with his high tech presentation. Oh well, must have been the highlight of the trial. I hadn't realized that the jury took written notes. I don't believe it's allowed in all states. Is it?
I can imagine trying to deliberate with all the do's and don'ts in the instructions.
I hope we get to see Jackson again soon on another trial. I'm a big fan of his.
:clap: :clap: :clap:
Hi BarnGoddess!The foreman is the one who took volumes of notes throughout the trial. I think that's the "notebook" being referred to ~ he has many of them!
I wonder if he's still around or has taken off yet! If he's planning on being in court for the verdict, do you think he'll pull something very melodramatic when the "guilty" verdict is read? I can't see him being handcuffed and going peacefully.I can't help but wonder what life is like in the Spector household these days! (shudder)![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for posting that! I stayed up and watched it and was so glad I did. An excellent presentation ~ just too bad it's still a story with no ending yet.Transcript of Dateline's 9/12/07 program on Phil Spector's trial--"Facing the Music." I didn't watch the show, but will be reading the transcript.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20749858/
I also liked the prosecutor in the 2nd Menendez trial. I think his name was David Conn? He would've been good for OJ trial also, but I also think a big problem there was the Judge.Alan Jackson is one of the top prosecutors in the LA County District Attorney's office, as a member of the Major Crimes unit. Patrick Dixon is the head of the Major Crimes unit and has been in the DA's office since 1976. The two top attorneys in the office are on the Spector case.
A criticism of Gil Garcetti's handling of the Simpson Trial was that he made Marcia Clark and Chris Darden the lead prosecutors. Clark and Darden were nowhere near the best in the office. According to Jeffrey Toobin's book on the Simpson trial, Vanatter had called in Clark for advice on the evidence and Garcetti left her on the case. In fairness, the other lawyers (among them Patrick Dixon) in the Special Trials/Major Crimes unit were either in or just starting trials of their own.
I wonder if he's still around or has taken off yet! If he's planning on being in court for the verdict, do you think he'll pull something very melodramatic when the "guilty" verdict is read? I can't see him being handcuffed and going peacefully.![]()
Yes he does, or the Court will come looking for him! I was thinking he might "take off" for parts unknown like Luster did.I think he's got to be there for the verdict, doesn't he?