Yes, I believe that's noted in one of his case profiles.I'm not sure if its been mentioned but in the PM photos it appears that John Doe has a scar through his right eyebrow. This could rule out potential matches.
Yes, I believe that's noted in one of his case profiles.I'm not sure if its been mentioned but in the PM photos it appears that John Doe has a scar through his right eyebrow. This could rule out potential matches.
Somehow I get the feeling there must have been more than one person involved. If it was just one, he would have to pull over, stop the car, open the passenger door to push the victim out. But, if the boy got in a car with several people..maybe in the back with someone. And some kind of altercation happened, maybe they robbed him (no id, no money but a paid stamp?) ended up killing him and then just pushed him out of the car? I don't know about the entire scenario but it does feel like more than one person was involved in leaving him in the street like that.Dumping a BODY on a street in Los Angeles, even in '79 and even in the wee hours of the morning seems unnecessarily risky. If he was already dead why not down a freeway embankment? In a dumpster? In the LA river? Panic and/or urgency. So either the killer wasn't the dumper, or the killer was THAT blase. And by blase I mean a psychopath and/or someone under the influence of something. The third option is the body was dumped to taunt LE, but since no follow up communications (that we know of), hard to say.
Cause of Death: Homicide by strangulationDoes this UP have a COD?
I think that is quite a leap. Look at Sherri and Jolaine, for example. They didn’t appear to be runaways or transient (in a commonly thought of sense), their family had been missing them, and there was/is likely no familial assailant involved in either death. We just never know until we know. If we ever do.The details say that based on the quality of the clothing he was wearing it seemed unlikely he was a runaway or transient. This sort of puts a unique spin on this case.
If he wasn’t a runaway or transient wouldn’t there be a family wondering where he went? Might this suggest a familial assailant?
Dumping a BODY on a street in Los Angeles, even in '79 and even in the wee hours of the morning seems unnecessarily risky. If he was already dead why not down a freeway embankment? In a dumpster? In the LA river? Panic and/or urgency.
Or maybe one of his 2 in 1's like Crotwell and May.Given the location, I wonder if this Doe was a Randy Kraft victim that was killed/disposed of in a hurry, hence the absence of some aspects of his usual MO. One of the unlinked scorecard entries is 'FRONT OF RIPPLES', for example, which could've been where this guy was picked up from. It's all very circumstantial though, nothing definitively ties this guy to Kraft.
Back in 78 where would you look? Say a kid runs away for the 4th or 5th time. You wouldn't necessarily report him as missing. So you might look for him but what parent thinks to scan the morgue for John Doe's? And I don't know exactly what was in the paper but the artist renderings don't look that much like the actual morgue photo. Even if they had internet access back then, googling his name wouldn't tell them anything. I just know if my kid was missing, I wouldn't even think to check the morgues. Could even be from the other side of the country.The details say that based on the quality of the clothing he was wearing it seemed unlikely he was a runaway or transient. This sort of puts a unique spin on this case.
If he wasn’t a runaway or transient wouldn’t there be a family wondering where he went? Might this suggest a familial assailant?
You're right. Where would you even begin to look? Unless family was local to the area and called the police to report them missing or saw the discovery of the body in the news, it would be a needle in a haystack, even today.Back in 78 where would you look? Say a kid runs away for the 4th or 5th time. You wouldn't necessarily report him as missing. So you might look for him but what parent thinks to scan the morgue for John Doe's? And I don't know exactly what was in the paper but the artist renderings don't look that much like the actual morgue photo. Even if they had internet access back then, googling his name wouldn't tell them anything. I just know if my kid was missing, I wouldn't even think to check the morgues. Could even be from the other side of the country.
Never mind, I read that wrong. The victim was in jail, not Kraft.Question: I have seen several references to Randy Kraft having murdered someone a day after being released from Jail on June 10 (or 11) in 1978. Does anyone know how long he was in for?
The most reliable way to know if a John/Jane Doe has been identified is thatI keep looking to see if they have identified him yet. How do you find out if a JD has been identified?
Good job Othram. I just saw on Facebook.Excited to share that we were able to assist Long Beach Police Department and the FBI in identifying 15-year old Kenneth Nevada Williams, formerly known as Long Beach John Doe.
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
![]()
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
After more than four decades, Long Beach John Doe is now known to be Kenneth Nevada Williams, a 15-year-old who had run away from his home in the City of La Puente in 1978dnasolves.com
Fantastic work!!Excited to share that we were able to assist Long Beach Police Department and the FBI in identifying 15-year old Kenneth Nevada Williams, formerly known as Long Beach John Doe.
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
![]()
After 44 Years, Long Beach John Doe is Identified
After more than four decades, Long Beach John Doe is now known to be Kenneth Nevada Williams, a 15-year-old who had run away from his home in the City of La Puente in 1978dnasolves.com
Thank you! This case was ranks up there with Lady of the Dunes in terms of worst DNA we have worked with...Fantastic work!!