I feel the same way. Are we just supposed to raise our kids to be suspicious of everyone, everywhere, all the time and never go to anyone else's house? No birthdays and slumber parties? I understand that's extreme but if there's no way for us to know what are we supposed to do? And what about parents of kids like these? I wouldn't know what to look for other than the obvious arson and animal abuse.... Very sad indeed.
I feel the same way. Are we just supposed to raise our kids to be suspicious of everyone, everywhere, all the time and never go to anyone else's house? No birthdays and slumber parties? I understand that's extreme but if there's no way for us to know what are we supposed to do? And what about parents of kids like these? I wouldn't know what to look for other than the obvious arson and animal abuse.... Very sad indeed.
I never said quiet equals to guarded and troubled. Always. But in some cases, quiet people are guarded and troubled, like in this case.Here is the thing with that line of thinking...
You also have kids (and adults for that matter) who have committed similar crimes who were very outgoing and not quiet...but people still had NO idea these things were going on inside of them. There have been plenty of cases where the perp was described as friendly, outgoing, social, etc. Yet, no one knew. Quiet does not equal guarded and troubled, just as outgoing does not equal open and honest. All personalities commit these crimes.
But you were able to get a link. I imagine anyone can find someone to give them a link then?
OMG.. they are interviewing a lady on the news tonight who is making it sound like Maddy should have known better or her Mom should've taught her better. Disgusting. And yes I'm emailing the news station.
I never said quiet equals to guarded and troubled. Always. But in some cases, quiet people are guarded and troubled, like in this case.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Because, you know, those mens with their raging hormones. They can't be held responsible. Blame those Jezebels who tempted this sweet, helpless man. Men are just powerless.
OMG.. they are interviewing a lady on the news tonight who is making it sound like Maddy should have known better or her Mom should've taught her better. Disgusting. And yes I'm emailing the news station.
When I sent my daughter to slumber parties I was careful to find out if there were going to be older siblings there too. I never broached the subject of the father or stepfather---but statistically speaking they are often the perps themselves. And I never let her sleep over somewhere where I did not know the parents and feel good about them.
But obviously you cannot totally prevent every bad thing from happening.
I never said quiet equals to guarded and troubled. Always. But in some cases, quiet people are guarded and troubled, like in this case.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
I respectfully disagree.
You have to know what you are looking for.
You have to seek it out.
You have to open the link.
A sick person looks for sadistic, ritualistic, abusive, death inducing snuff. A normal 15 year old does not just type
into the internet and find it. With the millions of sites and pictures, you would specifically have to go looking for it.
Whoever "gets" a link from someone, is getting a link from someone that Searched and sleuthed it out.
IMO, you are being argumentative about this one. A normal child does not just ask around for someone to give a link to someone raping a child. They just don't. It takes a very demented, sick individual to lust after this kind of thing and seek it out.
This is not normal. You have to remember that us websleuthers are exposed to so much more than your average joe. What we know can be found is not the thoughts of anyone walking the streets.
I would drop dead if I found out that this boy killed this sweet girl because he watched, because he had a cell phone or because his mom wasn't home at night.
It takes an exceptional individual to do something like this. I hope they never let him out.
He was a troubled boy for sure to have done something like that. That was not evidenced by his putting on yoyo shows of course. Was he guarded and quiet? Yes he was. And yoyo shows don't require a lot of talking.By all accounts to date, this boy was involved in the community and a friend. An avid yo-yoer. Putting on yo yo shows does not depict a guarded or troubled boy.
It was my view that he was guarded and troubled. I'm not MSM.I have not read a single thing about him being guarded and troubled. I'm not saying he couldn't have been, but that's not in MSM anywhere.
I believe it is really easy to find such content. Many boys here typically accessI respectfully disagree.
You have to know what you are looking for.
You have to seek it out.
You have to open the link.
A sick person looks for sadistic, ritualistic, abusive, death inducing snuff. A normal 15 year old does not just type
into the internet and find it. With the millions of sites and pictures, you would specifically have to go looking for it.
Whoever "gets" a link from someone, is getting a link from someone that Searched and sleuthed it out.
IMO, you are being argumentative about this one. A normal child does not just ask around for someone to give a link to someone raping a child. They just don't. It takes a very demented, sick individual to lust after this kind of thing and seek it out.
This is not normal. You have to remember that us websleuthers are exposed to so much more than your average joe. What we know can be found is not the thoughts of anyone walking the streets.
I would drop dead if I found out that this boy killed this sweet girl because he watched, because he had a cell phone or because his mom wasn't home at night.
It takes an exceptional individual to do something like this. I hope they never let him out.
I respectfully disagree.
You have to know what you are looking for.
You have to seek it out.
You have to open the link.
A sick person looks for sadistic, ritualistic, abusive, death inducing snuff. A normal 15 year old does not just type
into the internet and find it. With the millions of sites and pictures, you would specifically have to go looking for it.
Whoever "gets" a link from someone, is getting a link from someone that Searched and sleuthed it out.
IMO, you are being argumentative about this one. A normal child does not just ask around for someone to give a link to someone raping a child. They just don't. It takes a very demented, sick individual to lust after this kind of thing and seek it out.
This is not normal. You have to remember that us websleuthers are exposed to so much more than your average joe. What we know can be found is not the thoughts of anyone walking the streets.
I would drop dead if I found out that this boy killed this sweet girl because he watched, because he had a cell phone or because his mom wasn't home at night.
It takes an exceptional individual to do something like this. I hope they never let him out.
It was my view that he was guarded and troubled. I'm not MSM.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Childis illegal. I'm not sure of other laws about
, but how on earth would it be possible to outlaw? How can you draw a line and say this is okay, but this is not? I'm not asking you like you should have the answer, it's just a general question.
I believe it is really easy to find such content. Many boys here typically accesssites at 10 years old... I'm pretty sure parents did not volunteer this sort of info out to their boys. The boys found them, passed them around, etc.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.