Still Missing CA - Maya Millete, 39, missed daughter's birthday, Chula Vista, 7 Jan 2021 *husband arrested* #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
Are you kidding? Not certain why the children believe this? Ah, MOO, the children have been brainwashed and that's why. Have you heard what LM's parent's say about Maya, and why she's missing? Have you grasped the maliciousness coming out of their mouths? The children live with those people who bad mouthed Maya and her family all along. It's no mystery to some of us why the children wrongly blame Maya's side of the family, and believe it's Maya's side of the family causing LM to be incarcerated. It's incredibly sad, but the only way those children will probably accept the truth is if LM is convicted of Maya's murder, but I fear, even then, the kids will cling to the stories they've been told by LM's parents.


A June trial date was set Monday in the legal battle over the guardianship of the three children of a Chula Vista woman who remains missing and her husband, who is suspected of killing her.

[...]

James said all three children are “doing remarkably well” despite the circumstances, but said she was concerned about how the various “unknowns” might affect them down the line, particularly whether their mother will be found and the outcome of their father’s criminal case.

[...]

James also noted that the maternal side of the family is seeking additional visitation with the children, who have remained with their grandparents since their mother’s disappearance.


While James said she wasn’t aware of any issues precluding more visitation, she noted, “these children strongly believe that their maternal family has caused (their) father’s incarceration and it makes them uncomfortable around that side of the family. I’m not certain why they believe this, but they do.”
It is incredibly sad!
 
  • #322
It is incredibly sad especially knowing how hard Maya's Family has worked to find her. No one on LM's side of the family has done anything to search for her, but of course, we know why that probably is the case. Maya's Family has done so much to be part of the children's life. MOO, I hate hearing that the children are not understanding the truth and reality of why Maya is missing. They must miss her so much, remembering their joyful loving Mother, and I fear their minds are full of confusion and denial. JMO and MOO.

Here's FoxNews5 with a thorough news video of today's proceedings.

Video included

The children’s guardian also reported that the kids, who range from kindergarten through middle school, are doing exceptionally well — all considered. She also said, addressing the maternal family’s request for visitation during the holidays, that the children believe Maya’s family is responsible for their dad being in jail and don’t want to have anything to do with them.
 
  • #323
It's possible "the 730 evaluation" from a psychiatric professional will do deeper into the children's emotional state. From what I understand, there's to be a custody trial set for June 2023. There will be a status hearing next week on November 3rd.


"On Monday, a court appointed guardian for the children requested what is called a 730 evaluation to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted."


As always, prayers that Maya is found. Please let her be found now.
 
  • #324
Are you kidding? Not certain why the children believe this? Ah, MOO, the children have been brainwashed and that's why. Have you heard what LM's parent's say about Maya, and why she's missing? Have you grasped the maliciousness coming out of their mouths? The children live with those people who bad mouthed Maya and her family all along. It's no mystery to some of us why the children wrongly blame Maya's side of the family, and believe it's Maya's side of the family causing LM to be incarcerated. It's incredibly sad, but the only way those children will probably accept the truth is if LM is convicted of Maya's murder, but I fear, even then, the kids will cling to the stories they've been told by LM's parents.


A June trial date was set Monday in the legal battle over the guardianship of the three children of a Chula Vista woman who remains missing and her husband, who is suspected of killing her.

[...]

James said all three children are “doing remarkably well” despite the circumstances, but said she was concerned about how the various “unknowns” might affect them down the line, particularly whether their mother will be found and the outcome of their father’s criminal case.

[...]

James also noted that the maternal side of the family is seeking additional visitation with the children, who have remained with their grandparents since their mother’s disappearance.


While James said she wasn’t aware of any issues precluding more visitation, she noted, “these children strongly believe that their maternal family has caused (their) father’s incarceration and it makes them uncomfortable around that side of the family. I’m not certain why they believe this, but they do.”

I wish the article had given a date in June...

edited to add: @Curious Me - I read the article - where did you get the 11/4/22 date for status hearing? I did not see that? TIA!
 
  • #325
  • #326
I'm still shocked that the children were placed with the paternal grandparents. It just doesn't make any sense.
 
  • #327
MOO, as far as I understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong please, the paternal grandparents lived in the home and were caregivers while the parents worked-- an arrangement existing for quite some time. If so, the children were very used to LM's parents being a part of their everyday lives.

A decision to not change anything else in the kid's lives when they had so recently lost their mother was what apparently was decided by the courts. It makes sense only to some extent, providing them with the security of what was familiar. However, no thought or attention might have been given to the fact that the paternal grandparents had strong (toxic, IMO) opinions against Maya and supported their son no matter what he did.

Sure, they may have been told now to not discuss anything about the case with the children, but as we saw and read they had strong opinions that they were able to convey to the kids early on in this case.

As seen and heard on a news video, the Gpa fed the kid's the idea that Maya left and abandoned them and almost ridiculed Maya's Family for believing she met with foul play at the hands of LM.

All MOO, thoughts and recollections.
 
  • #328
MOO, as far as I understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong please, the paternal grandparents lived in the home and were caregivers while the parents worked-- an arrangement existing for quite some time. If so, the children were very used to LM's parents being a part of their everyday lives.

A decision to not change anything else in the kid's lives when they had so recently lost their mother was what apparently was decided by the courts. It makes sense only to some extent, providing them with the security of what was familiar. However, no thought or attention might have been given to the fact that the paternal grandparents had strong (toxic, IMO) opinions against Maya and supported their son no matter what he did.

Sure, they may have been told now to not discuss anything about the case with the children, but as we saw and read they had strong opinions that they were able to convey to the kids early on in this case.

As seen and heard on a news video, the Gpa fed the kid's the idea that Maya left and abandoned them and almost ridiculed Maya's Family for believing she met with foul play at the hands of LM.

All MOO, thoughts and recollections.
They also allowed the father to talk to them, even when he wasn't supposed to. They are so cruel. These poor kids will realize what was done to their mother and to them.
 
  • #329
They also allowed the father to talk to them, even when he wasn't supposed to. They are so cruel. These poor kids will realize what was done to their mother and to them.
Unfortunately, I think it will be a long time before they come to this realization. They're only children now that are living only in the environment and with people, they've known all of their young lives. In other words, they are thriving (per the court) because they know no difference. This is their normal. MOO :(
 
  • #330
Unfortunately, I think it will be a long time before they come to this realization. They're only children now that are living only in the environment and with people, they've known all of their young lives. In other words, they are thriving (per the court) because they know no difference. This is their normal. MOO :(
I wonder if the oldest child believes it as much as the younger ones.
 
  • #331
Friday, November 4th:
*Status Hearing (re Guardianship) (@ am PT) - CA - *May “Maya” Millete (39) (last seen @ home on Jan. 7, 2021, near San Miguel Ranch area, Chula Vista & reported missing Jan. 9, 2021 by her sister; not found). *Larry Ibarreta Millete (40/now 41) charged (10/18/21), arrested (10/19/21) & arraigned (10/21/21) with murder. Plead not guilty. Held without bond. Denied bail (11/4/21). Found mentally competent to stand trial (9/26/22).
*Larry Millete (39/now 41) regarding gun violence restraining order on possession of guns (1/7/21) <<temporary GVRO in place against Millete was dissolved 12/1/21. Plead not guilty.
Guardianship Case: Family Court Case #37-2021-00046499: Tabalanza, Pabilot vs. Millete, Larry / Family Court Petition for Visitation Case #FL21005040S / Probate court site: San Diego
Case & court info from 1/7/21 thru 9/30/22 reference post #315 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...-7-jan-2021-husband-arrested-5.600342/page-16

10/1/22 Update: Guardian ad litem hearing on 10/24/22.
10/12/22 Update: Murder: In court on Tuesday Judge Dwayne Moring modified the criminal protective order against Millete, whose only spoke in court when asked if he understood the guidelines, to which he replied, "Yes, sir." Per a request from his defense attorney, Millete will now be allowed to have written communication with his children. However, telephonic communication & in-person visits are still forbidden. The judge ruled that any letters must be reviewed by the children’s court-appointed guardian, who will monitor the communications for any inappropriate content, which would include discussing the case or attempts to unduly influence the children. Millete is due back in court on 12/6/22 for a preliminary exam readiness hearing, and then again on 1/11/23 for a preliminary hearing. During that hearing, which is expected to last up to three weeks, the prosecution will present evidence it believes will support the charges of murder & unlawful possession of an assault weapon filed against him.
10/24/22 Update: Guardianship: Kelley James, the court-appointed guardian ad litem, requested at a Monday hearing that an expert conduct what’s called a 730 custody evaluation prior to trial to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted. James said she believed it was important for the court to hear from someone “with experience in investigating trauma” during the trial, as “these children have experienced a significant amount of trauma.” James said all three children are “doing remarkably well” despite the circumstances, but said she was concerned about how the various “unknowns” might affect them down the line, particularly whether their mother will be found & the outcome of their father’s criminal case. James also noted that the maternal side of the family is seeking additional visitation with the children, who have remained with their grandparents since their mother’s disappearance. Next status hearing on 11/4/22.
 
  • #332
Did not find anything on what happened at the guardianship hearing on Friday. I do have trial in June, 2023 but no exact date.

for murder charges:

Defendant: Larry Ibarreta Millete
Defense Counsel: Bonita Martinez
Court No. CS319857

Date: 12/06/2022
Time: 09:00 AM

Event: Preliminary Exam Readiness

Location: San Diego Superior Court, South County Division, South County Regional Center, Dept. 14

link: Case Information, Search - San Diego County District Attorney


Also - in my notes I have him for preliminary hearing on 1/11/23.
 
  • #333
Anything happening with the Guardianship part of this case? I have the last hearing on 11/4/22 & a trial in June - but no date.

Anyone have info on this?

TIA! :)
 
  • #334
I can't find anything. It was only a Status Hearing and none of the local news outlets mentioned it on the news. Figure the 730 evaluation is going to take some time, so they may not set the exact date yet for June 2023.
It's possible "the 730 evaluation" from a psychiatric professional will do deeper into the children's emotional state. From what I understand, there's to be a custody trial set for June 2023. There will be a status hearing next week on November 3rd.
Posted: Oct 24, 2022 / 03:24 PM PDT / Updated: Oct 25, 2022 / 07:49 AM PDT
"On Monday, a court appointed guardian for the children requested what is called a 730 evaluation to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted."​
 
  • #335
I can't find anything. It was only a Status Hearing and none of the local news outlets mentioned it on the news. Figure the 730 evaluation is going to take some time, so they may not set the exact date yet for June 2023.

Posted: Oct 24, 2022 / 03:24 PM PDT / Updated: Oct 25, 2022 / 07:49 AM PDT
"On Monday, a court appointed guardian for the children requested what is called a 730 evaluation to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted."​

Thank you! :)
 
  • #336
Tuesday, December 6th:
*Preliminary Exam Readiness Hearing (murder) (@ 9am PT) - CA - *May “Maya” Millete (39) (last seen @ home on Jan. 7, 2021, near San Miguel Ranch area, Chula Vista & reported missing Jan. 9, 2021 by her sister; not found). *Larry Ibarreta Millete (40/now 41) charged (10/18/21), arrested (10/19/21) & arraigned (10/21/21) with murder. Plead not guilty. Held without bond. Denied bail (11/4/21). Found mentally competent to stand trial (9/26/22).
*Larry Millete (39/now 41) regarding gun violence restraining order on possession of guns (1/7/21) <<temporary GVRO in place against Millete was dissolved 12/1/21. Plead not guilty.
Guardianship Case: Family Court Case #37-2021-00046499: Tabalanza, Pabilot vs. Millete, Larry / Family Court Petition for Visitation Case #FL21005040S / Probate court site: San Diego; Trial in June, 2023 (no specific date).
Case & court info from 1/7/21 thru 10/12/22 reference post #331 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...-7-jan-2021-husband-arrested-5.600342/page-17

10/24/22 Update: Guardianship: Kelley James, the court-appointed guardian ad litem, requested at a Monday hearing that an expert conduct what’s called a 730 custody evaluation prior to trial to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted. James said she believed it was important for the court to hear from someone “with experience in investigating trauma” during the trial, as “these children have experienced a significant amount of trauma.” James said all three children are “doing remarkably well” despite the circumstances, but said she was concerned about how the various “unknowns” might affect them down the line, particularly whether their mother will be found & the outcome of their father’s criminal case. James also noted that the maternal side of the family is seeking additional visitation with the children, who have remained with their grandparents since their mother’s disappearance. Next status hearing on 11/4/22. Murder: Preliminary exam readiness hearing on 12/6/22 & a preliminary hearing on 1/11/23.
11/4/22 Update: Guardianship: The family of missing Chula Vista mom Maya Millete has been seeking custody & more visitation from the very beginning of this horrific ordeal. So far, they have been unable to come to an agreement regarding joint custody. On Monday, they asked for a trial to force the issue. On Monday, a court appointed guardian for the children requested what is called a 730 evaluation to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly & can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted.
 
  • #337
Tuesday, December 6th:
*Preliminary Exam Readiness Hearing (murder) (@ 9am PT) - CA - *May “Maya” Millete (39) (last seen @ home on Jan. 7, 2021, near San Miguel Ranch area, Chula Vista & reported missing Jan. 9, 2021 by her sister; not found). *Larry Ibarreta Millete (40/now 41) charged (10/18/21), arrested (10/19/21) & arraigned (10/21/21) with murder. Plead not guilty. Held without bond. Denied bail (11/4/21). Found mentally competent to stand trial (9/26/22).
*Larry Millete (39/now 41) regarding gun violence restraining order on possession of guns (1/7/21) <<temporary GVRO in place against Millete was dissolved 12/1/21. Plead not guilty.
Guardianship Case: Family Court Case #37-2021-00046499: Tabalanza, Pabilot vs. Millete, Larry / Family Court Petition for Visitation Case #FL21005040S / Probate court site: San Diego; Trial in June, 2023 (no specific date).
Case & court info from 1/7/21 thru 10/12/22 reference post #331 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...-7-jan-2021-husband-arrested-5.600342/page-17

10/24/22 Update: Guardianship: Kelley James, the court-appointed guardian ad litem, requested at a Monday hearing that an expert conduct what’s called a 730 custody evaluation prior to trial to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly and can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted. James said she believed it was important for the court to hear from someone “with experience in investigating trauma” during the trial, as “these children have experienced a significant amount of trauma.” James said all three children are “doing remarkably well” despite the circumstances, but said she was concerned about how the various “unknowns” might affect them down the line, particularly whether their mother will be found & the outcome of their father’s criminal case. James also noted that the maternal side of the family is seeking additional visitation with the children, who have remained with their grandparents since their mother’s disappearance. Next status hearing on 11/4/22. Murder: Preliminary exam readiness hearing on 12/6/22 & a preliminary hearing on 1/11/23.
11/4/22 Update: Guardianship: The family of missing Chula Vista mom Maya Millete has been seeking custody & more visitation from the very beginning of this horrific ordeal. So far, they have been unable to come to an agreement regarding joint custody. On Monday, they asked for a trial to force the issue. On Monday, a court appointed guardian for the children requested what is called a 730 evaluation to get a professional psychiatric account of the children’s current emotional state. This is common in family court proceedings, but costly & can take anywhere from three to five months. It was granted.
From the local CBS channel stating the pre-trial hearing will start Jan. 11, 2023. Not really anything new, except the expectation that the pre-trial may run for 3 weeks.
 
  • #338
From the local CBS channel stating the pre-trial hearing will start Jan. 11, 2023. Not really anything new, except the expectation that the pre-trial may run for 3 weeks.

Thanks - but it will be a preliminary hearing... :)
 
  • #339
Thanks - but it will be a preliminary hearing... :)
In the video broadcast, News 8 reporting from the courthouse said there will be a 3-week preliminary hearing. That's not right, correct?

I believe the trial might require 3 weeks but not the prelim where the judge decides whether or not the state met probable cause to bound the case over for trial. I can see two or three days scheduled.

But this is CA where I'm constantly surprised about their system...

Also, I recall the Judge granted expanded media for the prelim for the defendants charged with murdering Aranda Briones but we never saw the hearing. Don't know what to expect for live coverage of Larry's prelim.
 
  • #340
In the video broadcast, News 8 reporting from the courthouse said there will be a 3-week preliminary hearing. That's not right, correct?

I believe the trial might require 3 weeks but not the prelim where the judge decides whether or not the state met probable cause to bound the case over for trial. I can see two or three days scheduled.

But this is CA where I'm constantly surprised about their system...

Also, I recall the Judge granted expanded media for the prelim for the defendants charged with murdering Aranda Briones but we never saw the hearing. Don't know what to expect for live coverage of Larry's prelim.

I too was surprised that they said 3 weeks for preliminary hearing. Maybe they heard incorrectly - and it IS about 3 days. I guess we shall see!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
3,445
Total visitors
3,573

Forum statistics

Threads
632,637
Messages
18,629,544
Members
243,231
Latest member
Irena21D
Back
Top