- Joined
- Jul 22, 2024
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 1,747
Yes! All that matters is your state of mind at the time of the act in question. If they can prove that you didn't have the capacity to understand what you were doing, and whether it was right or wrong, then that means there was no actual intent. However, you can have any mental illness under the sun and still not reach the bar of "Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder" (that's the Canadian term, so insert whatever they use in California here please) if you did know the difference at the time of the act, and they can prove intent. Having a diagnosed illness itself is not enough to meet the criteria for diminished responsibility.Can you be mentally insane without having diminished responsibility as a possibility when it comes to sentencing
Antipsychotics have a sedative quality, so they can achieve both simultaneously in this case.More like "sedated", methinks.
God, this is so perfectly said. Yup, for some reason we decided this was better.Sidewalks and prisons function as mental institutions nowadays.
.
