CA - O.J. Simpson & the murders of Nicole Brown, Ron Goldman, 1994 *not guilty*

  • #141
This program is being repeated Sunday night at 8pm ET.
 
  • #142
I can't stand OJ Simpson. I can't stand to even look at him because of his arrogance and knowing that he took the lives of two people without any remorse. To listen to him is even worse and I will never understand why anyone ever has him on their shows. He sits there and lies and thinks he is so hot. Creep. He still thinks he is some hot shot sports hero. He played sports so long ago if it hadn't been for what he did to Nicole and Ron no one would probably even remember his name.

I hope that Fred Goldman wins the suit. It would make my day. My heart has always gone out to that family. To lose your son in such a way and then have the killer walk out of the courtroom grinning! I'm surprised that someone hasn't caught OJ Simpson in a dark ally and blown his brains out by now. Like someone said though...when he meets his maker he will also pay for his crimes and no amount of money will change that. I just wish we could be there to see it happen. He won't be laughing and acting like an old horney dog around young girls then.
 
  • #143
I must confess to being a Simpson Trial addict. FWIW, I don't think it was an "accident" that Simpson killed Ron Goldman. According to Faye Resnick, Simpson had told Goldman to "stay away from my wife," in front of Starbucks cafe. Ron had also been seen driving Nicole's Ferrari, which Simpson considered "his car," as O.J. had paid for it. The murder scenario may well be that Simpson was watching (he frequently spied on her) Nicole's apartment and exploded in a murderous rage when he saw Ron drive up that night on his errand to deliver the glasses.

Fred Goldman is right in his quest to "drag the killer back into court over and over again." Simpson was divorced from Nicole and had no claim on her, especially considering his previous behavior.
 
  • #144
Please forgive me if I am way off base here, but I saw the interviews with Fred and Kim last week and it looked like Kim had a large scar running down the right side of her nose (starting at the bridge of the nose, and running along the cheek down to near the mouth). It looked like she had had a serious facial injury. I don't remember ever noticing this before and wonder if she had a terrible accident in the years since the trial. Did anybody else notice this? I suppose it could have been lighting, but it sure looked like a scar.
 
  • #145
Cypros said:
Please forgive me if I am way off base here, but I saw the interviews with Fred and Kim last week and it looked like Kim had a large scar running down the right side of her nose (starting at the bridge of the nose, and running along the cheek down to near the mouth). It looked like she had had a serious facial injury. I don't remember ever noticing this before and wonder if she had a terrible accident in the years since the trial. Did anybody else notice this? I suppose it could have been lighting, but it sure looked like a scar.
I did not see the interview so I did not notice anything. I never heard of an accident or anything.
 
  • #146
Cypros said:
Please forgive me if I am way off base here, but I saw the interviews with Fred and Kim last week and it looked like Kim had a large scar running down the right side of her nose (starting at the bridge of the nose, and running along the cheek down to near the mouth). It looked like she had had a serious facial injury. I don't remember ever noticing this before and wonder if she had a terrible accident in the years since the trial. Did anybody else notice this? I suppose it could have been lighting, but it sure looked like a scar.

I watched but did not notice.
 
  • #147
Wonder if OJ is still looking for the real killers????
On every golf course and strip club he's at.
 
  • #148
Sadly I wonder if its lawyers encouraging Mr Goldman to do this as well.

Here's my opinion for what it's worth. :)

I think the attorney's came to Fred Goldman themselves, yes, for whatever reason, because they feel for the man, because it gets them publicity, whatever. I do think they take the case pro bono, maybe take something if they win..................... I don't think Fred Goldman is a stupid man, it keeps the finger pointed at "The Killer", who regardless of how he acts, doesn't want the bad publicity I don't think. He would like it all to just go away........... His wonder reputation from year ago, is gone, the great football player is NO more.

I hate attorney's theya re the only ones that win in any situation, but in this case let them go for it, I hope they have a chance, it would be the best punishment at this point that OJ could get.......................

I think all Fred Goldman and family want at this point is for OJ to not be out there making money off this crime, the money judgement isn't what's important to the Goldman's or Nicole's family, that won't bring their loved ones back, it's getting to OJ
 
  • #149
I wish Fred Goldman would lobby to eliminate that Florida law exempting Pensions from being attached due to a civil liability finding, I think it is NONSENSE. The annual amount that is received should be considered as annual income like any other wage.

I wish, at the same time, Fred Goldman would lobby to have a Federal law adopted that would be constitutional at the same time as it PROHIBITS criminals & Jurror's from profiting by any works as a result of the publicity of a crime.

Wish Mr. Goldman nothing but the best in all of his efforts. That flippin beast & racist Jury are a disgrace.
 
  • #150
I wish he would some how get something from OJ that would give him some kind of relief. I know his son will never be back but seeing the person who murdered him parading around has too me more than one person can bear.
 
  • #151
LOS ANGELES, Oct 22, 2006 (UPI via COMTEX) -- Eleven years after his acquittal in the California deaths of his ex-wife and her friend, O.J. Simpson describes in a book how he "hypothetically" killed them.

~~~SNIP~~~

www.upi.com

"Hypothetically" my left foot. He's getting paid 3.5 MILLION for this!!!!!!:furious:
 
  • #152
Well good. He's always finding ways to make money. Let's hope that every dime goes to the Goldmans. :mad:
 
  • #153
Sniffy38 said:
Well good. He's always finding ways to make money. Let's hope that every dime goes to the Goldmans. :mad:
According to the article I read in the Enquirer about this, not one cent goes to the Goldman's. I guess he found away around that again. The Enquirer says he was advanced 2.5 Million and will receive the other 1 Million on the date of release. He's paid off his house in Miami and bought a condo in the Bahamas.

I can't tell you how mad this makes me. He's done nothing but rub this in the Goldman's noses from day 1. I admire Fred Goldman's restraint. I know I wouldn't be as nice.....:behindbar
 
  • #154
I just saw that at the grocery store Tez, and he has no honor, just a black soal.

I scanned a bit of the article waiting in line, and tried to find the other person, that is the accomplice, that went with him to the house. Did it name that person Tez? I doubt it

So OJ doesn't have to worry about double jeopardy, but this other person could still be charged. And I would think the civil lawsuit could attach this money he is getting for the book. How did this 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 ever get around that?

Has anyone seen a photo of his kids recently?



Scandi
 
  • #155
scandi said:
I just saw that at the grocery store Tez, and he has no honor, just a black soal.

I scanned a bit of the article waiting in line, and tried to find the other person, that is the accomplice, that went with him to the house. Did it name that person Tez? I doubt it

So OJ doesn't have to worry about double jeopardy, but this other person could still be charged. And I would think the civil lawsuit could attach this money he is getting for the book. How did this 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 ever get around that?

Has anyone seen a photo of his kids recently?



Scandi
The accomplice was named "Charlie." My best bet would be AC, but that's just me.....

I saw one of Sydney about 8 months ago. I haven't seen one of Justin in a long time.

I guess he is just lucky to find ways of not paying any money toward what he owes the Goldman and Brown family. I just hope the karma train doesn't pass him by....
 
  • #156
AC, was that the shorter guy with dark hair that drove the white jeep? I never studied the case on a forum, just watched the news and trial. For some reason I always thought the guy I'm thinking of was a pretty straight shooter.


candi
 
  • #157
I'd really like to know where the kids stand on O.J. If I remember correctly, O.J. and Sydney had a good "row" a couple of years ago. I have not heard anything about Justin. I'd love to hear their "take" on this book.
 
  • #158
He is a pathetic excuse for a human being and I for one, will be celebrating when he gets his. He makes me sick.:furious: The f*ing arrogance of this scum.
 
  • #159
This has "tabloid" written all over it. Whether you believe OJ guilty or innocent of his ex-wife's (and Goldman's) murder, I wouldn't put in any stock in this version.
 
  • #160
The reason I think you might be right about this Lovely is if it is true he could escape paying a civil debt like they say he has, what is the sense in ever going through the time and agony of getting such a judgement. I don't believe that this income of his could be exempt from that civil judgement.


Can the judgement attatch to his bank accounts, or as liens on his real property? If not it is worthless, and the American public need to know this is how the law works.


Scandi
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
1,292
Total visitors
1,429

Forum statistics

Threads
632,302
Messages
18,624,530
Members
243,081
Latest member
TruthSeekerJen
Back
Top