CA - O.J. Simpson & the murders of Nicole Brown, Ron Goldman, 1994 *not guilty*

  • #181
Sandy247 said:
OJ is a creep. I think that he honestly thinks someone will buy this bull****. I guess he thinks we are all stupid. This guy really ticks me off. He is in TOTAL denial about everything. May God have mercy on his soul....

Obviously the publisher thinks someone is going to buy it if they are paying him 3.5M for it -- you can definitely count me out. As far as I am concerned, that man is dead and buried. OJ who?
 
  • #182
I don't like OJ, not one bit.. :furious:
 
  • #183
I just wish he disappears!!! :loser:
 
  • #184
O.J. Is a :loser: . He butchered ron and nicole. I got so tired of when the trial was going on all this crap of how nicole did this with faye resnick, poor O.J. boo hoo. He will get his one day when he stands before his maker. He is not perfect and points the finger to this day about nicoles behavior. Poor Ron, in the wrong place at the wrong time. I cant believe he got away with these murders. What a HORRIBLE Injustice! You can see in the Goldmans Eyes and the Browns how heartbroken they are. Their lives will never be the same.
 
  • #185
scum of the earth.
 
  • #186
I think OJ is just so cocky and egotistical that it's burning him up inside that he's not able to "confess" this to people. He's probably proud of what he did and wants to brag about it and has found the ultimate way to do it. A 3.5 million dollar book deal, an interview on Fox and now he can flaunt it in the face of the Simpsons and the Goldmans. He's a sick, sick man.
 
  • #187
I don't care how much money they will make - shame on the publishers and networks who pay to disseminate this "story" by OJ - human garbage personified. I am usually a free enterprise - free speech person but this just makes me sick. I am really surprised someone hasn't taken him out.

Eve
 
  • #188
  • #189
O.J. is a very perverse sick individual IMO - but these sheisters willing to publish this kind of garbage are just as sick and perverse IMO.
 
  • #190
raisincharlie said:
O.J. is a very perverse sick individual IMO - but these sheisters willing to publish this kind of garbage are just as sick and perverse IMO.


Ditto that. I think this is a new low in journalism. Blech.
 
  • #191
How can anyone be low enough and greedy enough to capitalize on that sick ba_____?

If I find out that publisher I will never buy from them again.
 
  • #192
cinsbythesea said:
Ditto that. I think this is a new low in journalism. Blech.
I'm not sure it is journalism - however I do hope in the end it comes back to bite them and Mr. Simpson right in the butttt.
 
  • #193
You know, this is absurd..OJ isnt going to tell the truth about how he would have committed them-u can tell by the first statement..'all people involved would be covered in blood'..since he wasnt and that is a known fact. (or I should say-they couldnt prove he was in the trial)..so its just going to be like that first video he made-where he said a whole lot of nothing-he will do the same here.
Now for my main point- Anyone who did not do the crime would say..."I cant comment on how I would have done thes e crimes because I have no clue how a murdurous mind operates..so I have no game plan in my head for such an act.

If he can give a "made up version of the events", he is the murderer. That outs him more than the legal system could.
I mean ask yourself the same thing-If I was going to murder ron an nicole how would I do it- I bet u would draw a blank..especially if u didnt already know them thru their story.

added- he is just going to give the same story of how a drug dealer had her killed or whatever..its a play on words..when he is actually interviewed he will say..I think what happened is...fay resnick story yada..
 
  • #194
Who even came up with this idea? Its absurd.
I think when it airs we should find out who the sponsors are and boycott their products.
Geez,maybe all the murdering sociopaths will jump on the band wagon. Maybe Peterson will do the same thing. Anything to keep their names in the paper.
There should be some law about this sort of thing.
 
  • #195
hockeymom said:
Who even came up with this idea? Its absurd.
I think when it airs we should find out who the sponsors are and boycott their products.
Geez,maybe all the murdering sociopaths will jump on the band wagon. Maybe Peterson will do the same thing. Anything to keep their names in the paper.
There should be some law about this sort of thing.
I agree..in fact its the networks that should refuse to do it imo.
 
  • #196
Okay, I think OJ is a real sicko - I think he did it - no doubt about it. But NOW I'M GETTING REAL CURIOUS HERE. The book is titled "If I did it" (although probably should be "How I did it". Anyway, now I am curious to see how close the book is to what the actual prosecution surmised had happened.

I'd actually be too embarrased to go buy it -- so if anyone gets ahold of it let me know. I promise I won't tell where it came from, lol.

In actuality, he could come out with a book titled "How I Did It and Got Away", because there's nothing anyone could do about it anyway - except maybe have him killed by a hit man, but if that were gonna happened it would have happened by now.... IMO.
 
  • #197
I can't believe he's going to be on TV promoting his BS - I hope the ratings for every show he is on go down in the gutter. He is an absolutely disgusting piece of garbage and it galls me that he has been footloose and fancy free all these years when his arse should have been sitting on death row.
 
  • #198
From what I have heard he is broke and since he cannot be tried twice I guess he is thinking of gaining from the murder's, which should be against the law. Also I also heard when the Goldman's were trying to sue him for his "name" because he was going to place's and people were wanting his autograph ect....and it was basically because people know he did the crime. He did a "spoof" on a show where he tried to sell the white bronco as a car salesman saying "it helped me get away". This man is a complete jerk. His kids are probably so embarassed.
 
  • #199
He's disgusting, and I'd expect no better from him - but the publisher - I'll be watching for their name on books I'd otherwise consider buying. Any surprise that the FOX network is the one putting out the publicity interviews? ABC has said they were approached, and turned him down - nice to hear.
 
  • #200
I read that he approached the publisher, Regan books or publishing, with his brilliant idea. Sad thing is, I'm not at all surprised that the publisher jumped on it.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
52
Guests online
2,987
Total visitors
3,039

Forum statistics

Threads
632,250
Messages
18,623,847
Members
243,066
Latest member
DANTHAMAN
Back
Top