First off, worked last night and do tonight also, so haven't been able to say thank you to JBean!!!! This is what we needed to be able to process information and keep it pertinent to specific subjects!!!! :woohoo::great:
The internal neck injuries in the AR could be explained by either a long drop hanging with the knot being to the right, or manual strangulation. The problem I have with the long drop hanging scenario that the police are putting forth is that there is no injury to the spine.
Also, if we are to accept that RN leaned over the railing and fell head first, where are the injuries to the front of RNs torso as she scraped over the metal edges of the railing?
In the AR we see only one line describing RNs torso injuries: None.
Cynic, once again you have shown me how important your expertise is!!! Thank you so much, and you are right! NONE of this makes any sense with the evidence as presented!!! Thank you for helping us out!!:seeya:
TY so much, Cynic, for taking the time to come here & give us your opinion.
I've wondered the same thing about the lack of scrapes and/or injuries to RZ's anterior torso.
I agree - if she leaned forward over the railing & somehow managed to hurl herself over, why is there no evidence of that on the front of her body? Since her hands were bound behind her back, and since the placement of footprints & toe prints on the balcony indicates that she DID go over the railing facing forward, where are the torso injuries?
Another thing - if the railing is 36" high (as LE indicated in their PC), that would put the railing several inches above RZ's hip area. I question how it is that she bent over a railing that was too high for her 5'3" frame to bend over without the aid of a stool or some other device to assist in clearing the railing.
I also find it very hard to believe that a 9'2" drop would not have resulted in a cervical spine fracture - or, at the very least, a significant displacement of those vertebrae when she was jerked by the rope. IIRC, the AR indicated the cervical vertebrae were not fractured or displaced, nor was her spinal cord injured.
Fantastic questions. We need to start a thread *hint hint* entitled Rebecca - information and evidence as it would relate to a murder. No arguments, information, links and discussion. This is not the place for suicide believers to post, there should be a different post for that. This will keep the arguments for either one, front and center, so to speak. As in RDI or IDI in the JonBenet forum, I think I am an RMV kinda gal! (Rebecca murder victim).
I dont think she hit it that hard to do any damage to the railing/wall. The hemmoraging under her scalp was minor so the impact wasn't that hard, imo.
IMO
This argument has been refuted and discussed prior. The impacts were hard enough to bring about a loss of consciousness, per medical examiners and doctors.
Thank you, and ITA with your observations.
The lack of injuries to the torso stands in stark contrast to the injuries sustained to RNs back.
From the AR:
Back: There are many punctate, linear, and slightly irregular abrasions on the back, extending from the neck to the mid buttocks and from each side of the back to the other. They are slightly more concentrated on the right thoracic back, with other ill defined groups across the lower lumbar back at the upper buttocks and on the left scapular and lateral mid thoracic back. Some appear to be paired and separated by a distance of 3/8 ½ inch. On the right paraspinal thoracic back, two pairs appear to be discontinuous linear abrasions measuring 3/8 and 5/8 inches in length, separated by 3/8 inches. The larger ovoid abrasions measure up to 3/16 inch in greatest dimension. The linear abrasions measure up to 3/16 inch in length. However, on the posterolateral right upper back along the right posterior axillary line there are two linear abrasions, the longest of which measures 5/16 inch.
On the lateral right thoracolumbar back there is a vertically oriented 3-1/2 x ¾ inch patterned contusion. There is a vertically oriented linear component. There appear to be three thin linear parallel components situated ¼ inch apart.
As far as Im concerned this means that RNs back dragged over something, whether it be the railing or something else.
How the ME does not find this to be completely inconsistent with the theory that he and police have proposed is beyond me.
BINGO!!! This needs to be posted in the arguments for murder thread!!! Cynic, have I told you lately that I truly believe you are a genius??!!:seeya::great:
Yes and the victim wasnt bound, gagged or nude.
The manner of death in the RN case should have been listed as undetermined at the very least, and the investigation ongoing.
Seems obvious, does it not?!:waitasec:
BBM
In some cases that's possible, but it's not the norm.
Since then, criminals have invested thought and energy in how to successfully foil the detectives brush and powder. Latex gloves, nitrile gloves, synthetic gloves, they have all been used by malicious perpetrators with varying degrees of success. Today, it is not at all uncommon to find discarded Nitrile gloves at the edge of a crime scene. Black nitrile gloves seem to have become a favorite of many criminals, for various reasons.
Fortunately, it is quite possible to obtain fingerprints from the gloves themselves at this point. They are found left either on the outside from the criminals donning or stripping of the glove or on the interior of a tightly fitted glove when it is turned inside out. A pair of Nitrile gloved hands, if tightly fitted, may even leave a print on an exterior surface. After the Nitrile is worn for a while, warming and conforming to the fingers, and the criminal touches any oily surface (something as simple as rubbing ones neck), a detectable fingerprint can transfer to objects.
http://www.glovenation.com/nitrile-gloves/nitrile-gloves-fingerprints.htm
Cynic, please correct me if I am wrong, but can't prints be taken from a garbage bag also? I have seen other cases where this has occurred. If the perp used it to cover his hands while painting, there would be finger prints inside the bag where he touched it, correct?:waitasec:
ITA, there are well documented cases where there is a complete absence of the perpetrators DNA and fingerprints. Hence the adage of "absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence."
Have I told you that I love the fact that you are such an amazing wealth of knowledge?! You rock!:rocker:
Evidence must be sourced to its original location. If an item of evidence came from a location other than the immediate crime scene, then the original location of the item of evidence must be checked for potential fingerprints & DNA, as well as other potential trace evidence.
Exactly! Case in point. The rope. If it was on the shelf in the garage, it was either brand new, in a package (where is the package), or it would have OTHER DNA on it somewhere, from being put on said shelf.
Also it doesn't say 'no dna, except that of Rebecca and Adam, where he touched it to cut her down or move her on the ground.:banghead:
I just went back and looked at all of the photos that were released of the guest bedroom and could not find a single red rope fiber on the floor anywhere. But I did notice something else that is bothering me. The plastic trash bag in the room has some paint on it and it is covering the tube of black paint. Why would the trash bag be put on top of the tube of paint? Is it possible that someone else who painted the "message" on the door used the plastic trash bag to not leave fingerprints behind on the tube of paint, the paintbrushes and the knives? I can see no other reason for it to be in the room.
http://sdsheriff.net/coronado/
If someone had a plan and gathered the 'evidence' for Rebecca to use, before 'approaching her', this may make sense. Otherwise, not so much.:waitasec:
BBM
I don't recall LE saying that anything specific about the quality of Rebecca's fingerprints--whether whole or partial, etc. Do you have a link for that information?
Re the gloves, it has not been determined what type of gloves a perp may have been wearing at the time. But I am curious about the information you provided and would appreciate a link for your statement. TIA
IMO, here has been no evidence discovered that anyone else was in the mansion, at the time Rebecca died because no one was looking for it at the time.
Thank you for this!!! Awesome point. Were there several prints? One print on each item? Smeared prints, barely recognizable?? Lots of questions about these 'prints'.
I wonder why they didn't hire a clean up crew. According to Rebecca's sister, their younger 13 year old sister had cuts and wounds on her hands that needed to be cleaned and cared for by the sister who's a nurse. I wonder why they didn't hire a crew, and take the 13 year old to the hospital to get her hands treated.
I thought it was her leg that got cut, according to some places. This concerns me, because if it was her hands, did she turn Max over? Also, early reports stated DS had cuts to her hands, later reports stated XZ had cut to her leg.:crazy: