CA CA - Sacramento, WhtFem, 50-60, UP2361, cancer patient died in hospital, multiple aliases- poss 'Suzi Clark'. Feb 2005.

[cheemsg]

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

Date of Discovery: February 10, 2005
Location of Discovery: Sacramento, Sacramento County, California
Estimated Date of Death: February 10, 2005
State of Remains: Unknown
Cause of Death: Lung Cancer

Physical Description​

Estimated Age: 50-60 years old
Race: White
Sex: Female
Height: 5'3"
Weight: 115 lbs.
Hair Color: Brown with grey
Eye Color: Blue
Distinguishing Marks/Features: She had several aliases (Suzi Clark, Carol Sue Wright, Suzi Peery, Suzi Land and a listed DOB 05-26-1945).

Identifiers​

Dentals: Unknown
Fingerprints: Unknown
DNA: Unknown

Clothing & Personal Items​

Clothing: Unknown
Jewelry: Unknown
Additional Personal Items: Unknown

Circumstances of Discovery​

The victim was an in-patient at UCDMC admitted on January 24, 2005 who died there on February 10, 2005.

 

[Kamiko123132]

If that was her birthday she would be listed in a 1950 census but there is a lot of “Suzi” maybe Suzi could be her first name for her last name I don’t know

 

[Myrrh]

7 rule outs in NamUs (Ashely Higgins was listed twice)

 

[Kamiko123132]

The amount of possiblitys for her last name is not surprising? could she had gotten married? What I got out of it her first name could be Suzi or Sue or its her middle name. Carol could possibly be her first name

 

[beavt]

Susan Sheeley?

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.

www.namus.gov

 

[ChatteringBirds]

May she rest in peace. I'm curious why she used so many aliases? Could it have simply been a way to receive medical treatment that she couldn't afford?

 

[summergirl1]

No fingerprints or dentals? Really? Did they cremate her before they realized she had several aliases? Or is that listing just not accurate? If they knew she had several aliases then I don't why in 2005 they wouldn't have gotten DNA too. Even if not and she was cremated ( that's usually what happens in CA with unclaimed and unidentified bodies), maybe there's something somewhere that they could get DNA from.

 

[LadyL]

May she rest in peace. I'm curious why she used so many aliases? Could it have simply been a way to receive medical treatment that she couldn't afford?

maybe her name was Carol Sue and she went by Sue or Suzi
as for the last names, maybe she got married four times

 

[Susikatze]

maybe her name was Carol Sue and she went by Sue or Suzi
as for the last names, maybe she got married four times

Plus possible adoption/foster history

 

[Kamiko123132]

OKAY I THINK I FOUND HER problem is that person is dead this person died in 1955 so this isn't the girls name which makes sense on why they didnt get any leads

 

[Kamiko123132]

So Legit I totally found her On family search everything matches up and the alias and the birthday problem is it says this woman died in 1995
BUT there is a unknown person with a name of Sue Wright I can send the link here if you want

 

[Kamiko123132]

maybe her name was Carol Sue and she went by Sue or Suzi
as for the last names, maybe she got married four times

I found the lady she died in 1995 with a person for info name FOR Sue Wright but this woman matches the UID person greatly I"ll see what else I can find
I got her parents name but I'm looking at the census Her maiden name (the woman who died in 1995) is Wright Carol S Wright and a person with info name is Sue Wright.. She used a dead persons name..
Problem is idk if this woman got siblings I'll needd to search more so I'll do that other then that I'm positive this is the name the UID victim used. I found this lady in the newspapers (She had a birthday party for her sevethen brithday)

 

[Aurora90]

Bumping

 

[The4TierBridge]

No fingerprints or dentals? Really? Did they cremate her before they realized she had several aliases? Or is that listing just not accurate? If they knew she had several aliases then I don't why in 2005 they wouldn't have gotten DNA too. Even if not and she was cremated ( that's usually what happens in CA with unclaimed and unidentified bodies), maybe there's something somewhere that they could get DNA from.

Post from last year, but I wanted to point out that an identifier being listed as Unknown is different that it being listed as Unavailable on the Doe Network website. Unknown just means whoever compiled the entry at doenetwork.org didn't know the status of it being available/unavailable.

NamUs 1.0 used to show if dentals/fingerprints/DNA was available or not publicly but this was removed when it switched to NamUs 2.0 in 2018 (which is why basically all newer entries say unknown/unknown/unknown for all three). That's where the Doe Network got the information from most of the time, and those fields technically only reflected whether or not those identifiers were submitted into NamUs or not (or were available elsewhere). Many of the entries also became outdated over time and have not been updated.

I see people confuse "Unknown" and "Unavailable" as meaning the same thing a lot and I wish the DN had something like a chart explaining what all the different info fields on their website mean.