Let's see... how do the city's crime stats relate..
1.People on this thread have insisted that it is fact that the trio are dead, verified by DNA evidence found in Parkhill by 'the ME', and yet, on the neighbourhood crime stats, I, for one, am having difficulty finding confirmation that 3 deaths occurred in the Parkhill neighbourhood
2.One of the reports states that there were 2 homicides in the Parkhill neighbourhood within the past 6 months, but meanwhile we are told there were 3 homicides. Could it be that one of the 3 was murdered elsewhere? If so, are we able to match up crime stats with verified homicides to distinguish perhaps where that took place?
3.The trio were reportedly killed in the month of June, but yet the June Crime Statistics list only 1 homicide in the entire city of Calgary within the month of June. We also have MSM reports stating there was a homicide in Calgary during the month of June, which was not related to this case. So there is the one homicide. Where are the 3 other murders if not in the June report?
Perhaps in July, you say? Why? Because it was in July when LE determined the 3 murders had occurred in June? Ok, so if we look at the July Crime Statistics, we see there were 4 within the entire city of Calgary in July. MSM also reports there were 4 murders in Calgary during July, which were not related to this case. So that still leaves these 3 murders unaccounted for in either June or July's Crime Statistics.
If one may be willing to state conclusively the trio are dead as fact because LE said so, then does it not seem odd that the 3 are not listed as homicides in either of those monthly reports?
4.We are told there is no place like Calgary, that Calgary's Police Service give absolutely no indication of any of the types of issues and potential problems that other police forces in larger cities within Canada seem to experience at times, that CPS are competent, there is no reason not to take their word as fact even when it isn't, and yet we see what have to be glaring errors in these reports. Not just in one of the reports, but in all of them, and not just the same error in each of the different types of reports, but different errors in each separate report. And not only that, but one of the downloads links to a completely different document than it states. These reports are displayed publicly for the world to see and they contain very important information regarding the things CPS are in-the-know about. It seems CPS are the keepers of these important stats, which are shared across Canada and combined with other police services to create our country's crime stats. One might presume that in light of all of that, CPS may wish to give a more impessive image of their competence to the public. Sure, these reports have disclaimers. Good excuse. One of the reports even states that it gets updated with new information. This case is now 5 full months old. One might imagine that they may have noticed the discrepancies and fixed them by now, especially when the stats are during the month of a very high profile case in their city. If not noticed by CPS, one might even take a leap to presume that in such a large city with such huge interest in this case, someone somewhere, may have even pointed out the error in the report which gets updated. And yet the errors remain. What is this telling us? My enquiring mind wants to know.
5.Is it possible that in fact these crime stats are NOT in error? It is possible that some theories on here, coming from people with black and white vision perhaps, could possibly be wrong? Is it possible that clues may be held within these reports, but not found because people cannot alter their beliefs even to consider other potential theories? These same people who cry out if it seems CPS are being called incompetent, even when they're not, seem to be all too willing to just accept that there are all these errors in all of these reports. Incongruous.
Also, if speaking about literacy, read the quote below. I'm not feeling the love. (BBM)
It's painful to be illiterate, eh ... granted, no one expects investigative literacy, especially when it comes to murder ... but ... doesn't there come a time when debating how a child and his grandparents that arguing crime stats is like a light bulb ... as in "how does it relate".
