Hazel
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 148
(respectfully snipped and bolded by me)Actually, Hazel, I believe you are correct in that you discovered a very poorly written statement, made by me.
Here is what I said: Quote: "Or, maybe, for this one case, we should overlook all but the New Glasgow News, because they seem to favour the person who named himself a person of interest with a CBC reporter; and they don't seem to have much interest in reporting what his mother wants reported."
I apologize for my wording, and hope the following is better: 'Or, maybe, for this one case, we should overlook all but the New Glasgow News, who appears to favour, imo, the person who named himself a person of interest with a CBC reporter; and the CBC, imo, doesn't seem to have much interest in reporting what his mother wants reported.'
Apologies accepted
