CANADA Canada - Audrey Gleave, 73, Ancaster ON, 30 Dec 2010 #10

[Claroon]

My studies are a hypothetical sample and may not apply to this case, but they are worth noting:

Specifically noting LE's reference of a 'sexual component' in the AG case of which we do not know:
In the U.S., sexual homicides by older male offenders (55+) account for only 0.5% of all sexual homicides.

Most offenders in sexualized or overkill homicides are usually (but not always):
• Male
• Under 55
• Often 25–45
This is because:
• physical strength is required
• sexualized motives skew younger
• impulsive violence decreases with age
• offenders over 65 are statistically rare in violent homicide

Many resources:: Age and sexual recidivism) Statistics about sexual assault | INSPQ

(there is much more on this age theory and the sexualization is only one aspect of this case, so I find it helpful to post in snippets so each aspect can be evaluated on its own. I feel this will be a long journey as I don't want to look up all the old posts sleuths shared LOL. So details may have already been discussed.)

So . . . if the offender was around 55 on December 30, 2010, today in 2026, they would be around 71. Could still be alive.
If the offender was 25–45 in 2010, today in 2026 they would be 41–61 now.

 

[Claroon]

Read in a Reddit post that followup LE assigned to the case did not think there was a sexual component although EMS suggested there was. That it was staged to look like it. This is a conundrum.

Though my stats point to a male, we can't be narrow focused. Some women are very strong too.

 

[Claroon]

Weather data for Dec 28–29, 2010 comes from Environment Canada’s Historical Climate Data (Hamilton Airport station), which is the closest official weather station to Lynden, Ontario. I wanted to know if she was perhaps having her driveway plowed by someone that day:

Cold (–5°C to –10°C range)
• Snow already on the ground
• No major new snowfall
• No storm system
• No heavy accumulation
• Not a snow‑plow day
• Roads would have been drivable

so rule out snow plow driver, unless he was coming to collect pay.

 

[Claroon]

Thinking through scenarios for 73/74 yr old woman living in a property alone with a long driveway in winter. Did anyone check into when trash pick up was assuming she had pickup at the end of the driveway and didn't haul it herself. She may have had a neighbour, or hired help to drive the bins to the end of the long driveway in winter. Could explain why she was in the garage in her sneakers, not boots like she was going out. i.e. maybe she was expecting her garbage helper.

 

[Parsnip]

I tend to think AG was in her garage without her dogs because she was fully expecting someone to enter. That someone would be a person who expected AG to be away from the home at the time; whom AG did not feel threatened by; and whom AG wanted to catch in the act and confront. Moo.

 

[FromGermany1]

I want to remind you of the fact, that AG reserved a portion of her assets for one child/children, who might potentially inherit them. There's an extra-page in the LastWill, where this provision is mentioned. No name, no gender, no age, no place of residence, no specific amount (I think). The executor would have had to pay attention to this advice.

We don't know, if AG ever gave birth. But after all she married very early (16yo) and twice more after her first marriage.

If she didn't get the job at AECL nuclear laboratories in Chalk River after 2 summers of work, because it was supposedly not a healthy environment for women/pregnant women, she herself may have been pregnant at the time. We don't know.

Years and years ago, we found a forum, where adoptive children were able to find their bio parents or vice versa. One user had the name "Aud", if I remember right, and PK named his friend Audrey also "Aud". It seemed to be an odd coincidence. Of course, all users are anonyme, and we can't find out, who "Aud" was or the participant (a girl) of the conversation.

My idea is, that a child, given away after birth, could have had ie. anger issues with the bio parents/bio mother in their later years.

Beside this, my suspect always remains the same.

All MOO.

 

[Claroon]

I tend to think AG was in her garage without her dogs because she was fully expecting someone to enter. That someone would be a person who expected AG to be away from the home at the time; whom AG did not feel threatened by; and whom AG wanted to catch in the act and confront. Moo.

What made you put together that scenario?

 

[Claroon]

Garage: There are many reasons a person is in their garage, door open or closed. Saw on Reddit her handyperson said it had a key code opener. Also on a Reddit post she was a heavy smoker and would smoke on a bench in the garage. Also that she would put the dogs in the house to keep them away from any visitor. She could have stepped into the garage for separation from the dogs to talk to someone. Another post said she didn't bring people into the home and was a suspected hoarder.

 

[Claroon]

I want to remind you of the fact, that AG reserved a portion of her assets for one child/children, who might potentially inherit them. There's an extra-page in the LastWill, where this provision is mentioned. No name, no gender, no age, no place of residence, no specific amount (I think). The executor would have had to pay attention to this advice.

We don't know, if AG ever gave birth. But after all she married very early (16yo) and twice more after her first marriage.

If she didn't get the job at AECL nuclear laboratories in Chalk River after 2 summers of work, because it was supposedly not a healthy environment for women/pregnant women, she herself may have been pregnant at the time. We don't know.

Years and years ago, we found a forum, where adoptive children were able to find their bio parents or vice versa. One user had the name "Aud", if I remember right, and PK named his friend Audrey also "Aud". It seemed to be an odd coincidence. Of course, all users are anonyme, and we can't find out, who "Aud" was or the participant (a girl) of the conversation.

My idea is, that a child, given away after birth, could have had ie. anger issues with the bio parents/bio mother in their later years.

Beside this, my suspect always remains the same.

All MOO.

I did think of that, actually. How would LE find out about an illegitimate child? If she had a child at 16, it would have been 58 by the time she was murdered.

Many believe the killer was known to her. Would this child have already met her by then? Would this be the first time of meeting in person?