I believe Ken has come to his final questions now too.
How do you get it to the point it can be presented in the manner you suggest Windsor? Ken has been represented by and been around some pretty good lawyers. He can best answer to this and we would all like to understand why not?
In the meantime, becoming familiar with what happened and all the arguments that have been tried in the past helps us to understand the enormity of what has to be overcome now.
I have been answering questions here and will. But my "mission" has changed.
I know no answer will ever be found.
I want to know why.
How do you get it to the point it can be presented in the manner you suggest Windsor? Ken has been represented by and been around some pretty good lawyers. He can best answer to this and we would all like to understand why not?
In the meantime, becoming familiar with what happened and all the arguments that have been tried in the past helps us to understand the enormity of what has to be overcome now.