Canada - Liana White, 29, Edmonton AB, 12 July 2005 - #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
spygirl said:
Could be.... we don't know anything yet. If he staged it, she wouldn't have her cell phone, depending on how the schmuck planned it. Hopefully we will find out more soon. But 2nd degree indicates to me that it wasn't pre-meditated.

Hmm.
Its even worse if he committed an indignity to a dead body-what kind of creep is he?
 
  • #102
  • #103
karmarama said:
Prayersformaura,


I just checked all the websites, no more info then what is posted here so far!


I can't help but think that Liana found out something about her husband and he felt he had to keep her quiet? a lot like Mark Hacking!

I have a feeling that he was involved in something, could be just my imagination, but, that's how I feel :(
thank you... I appreciate the updates.

I definitely feel like this is a mark hacking.
Another case where she is pretty and he looks like a loser :furious:
Sorry, I know that's mean, but man ... this makes me mad.

I wonder if her seat of her SUV was adjusted ... like Lori hacking's was.
 
  • #104
newtv said:
he has been charged with second degree murder and an indignity to a human body charges (necrophilia I bet).
WTF? :eek:

Maybe he tried to do something to the baby - shoved something inside her in a fit of rage?

This is just nuts!
 
  • #105
PrayersForMaura said:
thank you... I appreciate the updates.

I definitely feel like this is a mark hacking.
Another case where she is pretty and he looks like a loser :furious:
Sorry, I know that's mean, but man ... this makes me mad.

I wonder if her seat of her SUV was adjusted ... like Lori hacking's was.
I agree-he is ugly and he is evil if he did this - i dont care if its premeditated or not- what could be defined as an indignity against a dead body - chopping it up??)
Or is it sex??
 
  • #106
Casshew said:
WTF? :eek:

Maybe he tried to do something to the baby - shoved something inside her in a fit of rage?

This is just nuts!
I know I am in a state of shock-thats all they said charged with murder++this indignity..OMG I really had a bad feeling about this guy-just the way he wailed for the tv.I mean no guy is going to breakdown like that so fast-she wasnt gone long enuf.
 
  • #107
PrayersForMaura said:
Another case where she is pretty and he looks like a loser :furious:
Sorry, I know that's mean, but man ... this makes me mad.
It's not mean. He needs to be drawn and quartered.
 
  • #108
I feel so badly for the remaining child and the family-why the hell do men do this-just leave for gods sake..or maybe she told him she was leaving.

I knew right from the timeline something was amiss..he got himself in trouble because the story wasnt true..its always those types of things he didnt expect..and I do not think he expected anyone to see her car earlier than she should have been there.

If he had said he didnt know when she left for work that would be one thing-but he said such a definite time..and he has further screwed up by saying he was sleeping and they have the same conversation every morning-well if they do you can be sure its at the very same time - 6:15 am. (The conversation and her going to work were nothing unusual-so thats why he said 6:15 in the first place.)
 
  • #109
newtv said:
I agree-he is ugly and he is evil if he did this - i dont care if its premeditated or not- what could be defined as an indignity against a dead body - chopping it up??)
Or is it sex??
I am thinking some sort of mutiliation, but I could be wrong.
They did use the word "remains" at one point and not body, but then I saw body elsewhere. i am completely stupified.
And I keep thnking about his comments about "if you're looking at the husband it's not me" sort of thing. :furious:
 
  • #110
Casshew said:
WTF? :eek:

Maybe he tried to do something to the baby - shoved something inside her in a fit of rage?

This is just nuts!
but the indignity is done to a dead body so she was already dead..not sure if he would be raging after or not..:(
 
  • #111
I hope he rots in hell. What on earth makes some men think they have the right to decide who lives and who dies???????
 
  • #112
Mabel said:
I hope he rots in hell. What on earth makes some men think they have the right to decide who lives and who dies???????
I agree mabel- I am horrified by this-and even mores o by the second part of his charges..for gods sake if u kill by accident in an argument you dont then comit another indignity toward the dead body.

I hope we get a board for this case as it will go to court and might be good to follow-and to make a case in canada a big deal - its just like hacking and peterson imo.
 
  • #113
OK I hunch he took a part of her body with him..it sounds like thats what it is from reading..stealing body parts as is the case with some docotrs etc.

182. Every one who

(a) neglects, without lawful excuse, to perform any duty that is imposed on him by law or that he undertakes with reference to the burial of a dead human body or human remains, or (b) improperly or indecently interferes with or offers any indignity to a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years. [R.S., c.C-34, c.178.]
 
  • #114
newtv said:
OK I hunch he took a part of her body with him..
do you have a body part in mind??? because I cannot think of anything :sick:
 
  • #115
Maybe someone from Canada knows the answer to this, but is it possible that a charge of "committing an indignity to a dead body (or human remains)" could come about simply because he 'dumped' her like yesterdays garbage AFTER he killed her
BTW...do they have the death penalty in Canada?
 
  • #116
Casshew said:
do you have a body part in mind??? because I cannot think of anything :sick:
no I do not - but its a fuzzy thing as there are no real examples-just that if u do any harm to a dead body its a crime..that could even be urinating on it-though how would they even know..they used that example in the case of photos of skin heads urinating on dead body parts in jewish cemetaries

OK I maybe was on the wrong track- I think in this case it might be as simple as hiding the body-digging and hiding her in the ground. (It can be that..when u do it for the sole purpose of hiding a dead body)..
 
  • #117
no, we don't have the DP here in canada...

..i looked for a case involving "indignity to a dead body":

http://www.pentictonherald.ca/?nopic=true&latest_date=2004/10/13

A Penticton man charged with killing his lover pleaded guilty Tuesday to disposing of her body improperly

Valliere said Boivin had died in his arms and he disposed of her body by carrying it in a backpack to a spot 500 metres from their home

The maximum sentence for offering an indignity to a human body is five years in prison. The maximum for manslaughter is life imprisonment.

..........the 2nd charge to michael white could then be due to his 'dumping her body' in the field...
 
  • #118
heavenlydaze said:
Maybe someone from Canada knows the answer to this, but is it possible that a charge of "committing an indignity to a dead body (or human remains)" could come about simply because he 'dumped' her like yesterdays garbage AFTER he killed her
No DP in Canada anymore.... last guy was hung in 1962. (hanged)
 
  • #119
Maybe someone from Canada knows the answer to this, but is it possible that a charge of "committing an indignity to a dead body (or human remains)" could come about simply because he 'dumped' her like yesterdays garbage AFTER he killed her

I think u are right-as I investigated it further it means the hiding of a dead body or its parts..so it may be just that- I havent heard of that before. (I mean doesnt everyone hide the dead body-so I am not sure why it is a charge here).

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/News/2004/01/07/306344.html
 
  • #120
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
2,423
Total visitors
2,494

Forum statistics

Threads
633,015
Messages
18,634,904
Members
243,378
Latest member
zwolf4
Back
Top