Summersolstice
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 6
RCMP tow a vehicle owned by Lyle and Marie McCann from a rural road near Highway 16 and Range Road 144 July 16, 2010
![]()
RCMP at the scene July 16, 2010 near Highway 16 and Range Road 144 where the vehicle of two missing seniors was discovered
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news...sonist+find+missing+couple/3288064/story.html
Wondergirl, I'm sure LE must have taken many more pictures than just that one angle we are seeing here. They HAVE to take pictures of the crime scene and surrounding area. The SUV is also considered a crime scene, and IMO it was found with the doors closed, but at that point nobody knew for sure WHAT or WHO they might find inside the SUV. The perp(s) could have been in there sleeping or hiding, and also the McCanns might have been inside the SUV, so obviously LE had to open the doors, and take pictures.
I still don't know what to make of the way the SUV looks (all muddy), and the tipsters in PG saying that the car looked as if it had been in water. Also IIRC, one of the tipsters mentioned something about 'rocks' inside the SUV? Did someone remember reading that? Could that mean the perp(s) drove the SUV around a lake/river shore? Did they attempt to submerge the SUV weighing it down with rocks? That SUV surely contains lots of evidence, not only of the perp(s) that stole/drove it, but evidence will aso reveal if the McCanns were put in the backseat at any point.
Wondergirl, I understand exactly what your question is aiming at, and I think we are all thinking the same, but it is just too hard to say it![]()
One more thing.
If DB was giving interviews to the press AND harbouring a fugitive, he must have had personal motivation himself to deflecting attention away from TV.
Or perhaps he was working with LE?!
Wondergirl, I'm sure LE must have taken many more pictures than just that one angle we are seeing here. They HAVE to take pictures of the crime scene and surrounding area. The SUV is also considered a crime scene, and IMO it was found with the doors closed, but at that point nobody knew for sure WHAT or WHO they might find inside the SUV. The perp(s) could have been in there sleeping or hiding, and also the McCanns might have been inside the SUV, so obviously LE had to open the doors, and take pictures.
I still don't know what to make of the way the SUV looks (all muddy), and the tipsters in PG saying that the car looked as if it had been in water. Also IIRC, one of the tipsters mentioned something about 'rocks' inside the SUV? Did someone remember reading that? Could that mean the perp(s) drove the SUV around a lake/river shore? Did they attempt to submerge the SUV weighing it down with rocks? That SUV surely contains lots of evidence, not only of the perp(s) that stole/drove it, but evidence will aso reveal if the McCanns were put in the backseat at any point.
Wondergirl, I understand exactly what your question is aiming at, and I think we are all thinking the same, but it is just too hard to say it![]()
One other thing on the SUV, I did notice that there was a towing apparatus attached to the SUV on the front.
Hi Hazel, I don't remember seeing anything about the tipsters thinking that the SUV looked like it had been in water. I know that some people here thought the mud marks on the side of the SUV looked like the car had been in water. I hadn't heard anything at all about rocks in the SUV, how could tipsters see that? Unless they were in a taller vehicle, or saw the SUV parked. If true, than it would seem that there was an attempt to submerge the vehicle but then the vehicle was found back in Alberta, not in P. George. This scenario would mean that someone drove the SUV back to Alberta after someone tried to sink it.
Interesting post by Rhonda under discussions " Junkyard Claim"
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=134245599942161&topic=216