- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,480
- Reaction score
- 71,228
I notice the RCMP has not said who rented the van and on what day, nor when it travelled to the various communities.
Wonder if Sarah wasn't 'officially' connected to Mohd as a next-of-kin because he had her out of wedlock in the late 90s, and then left then a few years later to move back to the US, and didn't officially reconnect with Sarah until 2017. When the letters he was sending weren't reaching Sarah, he might of thought she and her mother wanted nothing to do with him.I wonder who is Mr. Abdullah's next of kin police notified about his death? Is there an investigatory reason they haven't spoken to his daughter?
Just to point out that, in a murder investigation, police have to be careful what they say and to whom. That includes relatives, close or long lost. Also, depending on the will, there may need to be a paternity test to put forth a claim on the estate.Wonder if Sarah wasn't 'officially' connected to Mohd as a next-of-kin because he had her out of wedlock in the late 90s, and then left then a few years later to move back to the US, and didn't officially reconnect with Sarah until 2017. When the letters he was sending weren't reaching Sarah, he might of thought she and her mother wanted nothing to do with him.
Still though, now that RCMP knows that Mohd does have a daughter, they should keep her in the know!! It's BS that her inquiries are being ignored![]()
Wow I didn't even think about the legal implications of how the motive quite likely has something to do with one of his clients so his cases will obviously be evidence but he has other cases to whom he owes attorney client privilege and which could easily contain incriminating information in them but could not be entered into evidence in this case. In sure that does make the investigating complex but I'm glad they're investing in it. I like to see as much evidence as possible being discovered in cases of organized crime and this really smells like organized crime to me.Not really an update, but:
The city’s top cop is describing the investigation into the murder of Mohd Abdullah as “very complex” and “unprecedented,” due to a man charged in connection with the death being a practising lawyer.
Lecky spoke about progress of the investigation during a June 9 meeting with the city’s community services committee.
“That was, is and continues to be a very complex investigation, the likes of which we haven’t seen in this province, certainly not in this city, because the accused in this matter, as you know, is a practising lawyer who was charged and the complications that are related to that from the judicial services needs are significant, expensive and, needless to say, very complex,” Lecky told the committee, which includes three city councillors.
“This is an unprecedented investigation for us, but it is progressing very well.”
The article goes on to talk about how the investigation required LE to search crime scenes, including the law office of the accused, where people's potentially sensitive information was kept, and a judicial referee was appointed to look at the evidence unearthed to determine which parts of it were pertinent to the investigation and which parts were not. This included looking at the contents of digital storage devices, and more, and is very labor-intensive.
Wow I didn't even think about the legal implications of how the motive quite likely has something to do with one of his clients so his cases will obviously be evidence but he has other cases to whom he owes attorney client privilege and which could easily contain incriminating information in them but could not be entered into evidence in this case. In sure that does make the investigating complex but I'm glad they're investing in it. I like to see as much evidence as possible being discovered in cases of organized crime and this really smells like organized crime to me.
In this case the attorney is the perpetrator though, or at least the one accused of murder.And not always organized crime either, sometimes just a client who’s a tad bit unhinged who believes their lawyer wronged them.
I recall this tragic hit and run of a Toronto attorney.
“It shouldn’t be dangerous to work in the legal field.”
![]()
MANDEL: Woman accused of killing Toronto lawyer with rental truck denied bail
It shouldn't be dangerous to work in the legal field.torontosun.com
In this case the attorney is the perpetrator though, or at least the one accused of murder.
well, i mean, he was found dead in a container in the attorney's vehicle...LE seem to have quickly identified the lawyer, with enough proof to charge him, so he left some obvious clues.
I'm guessing he'll do what lawyers always advise, and remain silent.
JMO
I was going to post that l've followed cases where a lawyer has been a victim of murder, but I couldn't recall one being the accused...but then I remembered Alex Murdaugh.Kamloops sure has a lot of murders for such a small place. Gives me the creeps.
Jo-Anne Donovan and Shannon White are 2 more from the last 18 months.
Wow. Article says the victim and the accused conspired to hide $774K from the victim's wife while the couple was separating. Accused allegedly spent the money and then killed MA when MA tried to get the money back.