let me reword my thought: there are a lot of other scenario's in which DM could be framed/set up. That's why i think saying 'this is the only ....' is a bold statement. JMO
that's all i'll say on it as i'm not convinced by the totality of the evidence that he was set up. JMO. It's hard to see DM not playing a crucial role in his murder.
calling it a night - hope the 'new info' from toronto star is more than just the condo thing... bye y'all!
IMO there are a number of scenarios and we really can't say there aren't factual leads because the leads we have are what have lead us to these ideas, although some imagination is required. IMO
I didn't get feed back on this thought: What if, IMO, he has a guy that wants him to escort him car shopping. So DM goes to the first guy and the second, in an orange shirt of all things, shows his tats, is a passenger, and then the guy testing the 2nd car drops DM off at the coffee shop (where they first met) - safe and sound. Then the other guy goes and does the killing. All of this is merely to frame him for some reason--not to get a car, etc.
In this scenario, he would not say anything to the police if indeed he did look at the car in an honest sort of way but doesn't want to incriminate himself. Thoughts? IMO