• #41
Some working hypotheses:

Was the perp:

  • A known acquaintance, casual pickup during transit -- like a friend saw her standing at the bus stop?
  • A slightly older contact (work/area), arranged ride -- like someone she met at her apartment building? Painter, etc. ?
  • An opportunistic contact such as choosing to hitchhike rather than wait for the bus?

    Route:
  • In 1980, no saying the bus route was this. Hypothesis, that the perp picked her up where she was waiting at a bus stop for the transfer.

    View attachment 653806

    Vehicle Hypotheses: If indeed a van...

  • Work van (trades/service) – painter, contractor, repair; common in 1980, mobile during daytime
  • Personal/custom “shag” van – owned by younger male, used socially. These might have curtains and tinted windows.
  • Borrowed/shared van – family or business vehicle used by someone else
  • Vehicle type uncertain / misidentified – did anyone actually see it? Could have been a van or another type of vehicle

Thanks for sharing these details. This lines up well with an older post's details

<div class="js-xf-embed" data-url="https://websleuths.com" data-content="post-14935155"></div><script defer src="https://websleuths.com/js/xf/external_embed.js?_v=953e7492"></script>
 
  • #42
Button and garment speculation from online research
  • A cardigan, sweater-jacket, vest, or pocket button
  • Possibly wearing a garment from the late 60s or early 70s,
Used heavily for years, producing the deep wear on button.

This type of clothing commonly worn by male 35–60 years old
• working-class
• practical dresser
• not fashion-conscious
• wearing older clothing until it wore out
• doing physical or outdoor work

May have been purchased from:
-Canadian Tire (outerwear + workwear)
-Small-town menswear shops in Bolton, Orangeville, Brampton
-Catalogue shopping (Sears, Eaton’s, Simpson’s
-Woolco (Brampton, Mississauga, or other nearby suburbs)

Men in rural Ontario often bought clothing from hardware stores, feed stores, general stores, and farm-supply shops, and these stores routinely carried wool cardigans, sweater-jackets, work vests, generic metal buttons, and private-label outerwear. (Archival inventories from the Archives of Ontario, the Wellington County Museum, the Dufferin County Museum, and rural retail studies in the Canadian Historical Review all document this.)

Based on the button, the most likely wearer in 1980:
• A working-class man, 35–60
• Living in or near rural Caledon/Orangeville
• Wearing a well-used cardigan, vest, or sweater-jacket
• Purchased locally in the late 60s or early 70s
• Worn for years, producing the deep scratches
 
  • #43
Thanks for sharing these details. This lines up well with an older post's details

<div class="js-xf-embed" data-url="https://websleuths.com" data-content="post-14935155"></div><script defer src="https://websleuths.com/js/xf/external_embed.js?_v=953e7492"></script>

The details from 2019 post by Snively:

There is a person of interest, but no suspect. The man, 45-years-old at the time Veronica was killed, would not face investigators in the interview room. He died in 2001, and there isn't enough physical evidence to say definitively that he was responsible for snuffing out the life of 18-year-old Veronica, or even to officially label him a suspect. He was 45-years-old, lived in Caledon, and he was working in Mississauga or Toronto. Police said that this man was married and had children. He lived in the Caledon area for about four or five years and was an active hunter. The suspect has died, and unless there's a witness or evidence, it's over.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
2,243
Total visitors
2,347

Forum statistics

Threads
645,046
Messages
18,833,082
Members
245,537
Latest member
Chele1013
Top